Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:32:22.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic and disturbance energy analysis of a flow with heat communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

NADER KARIMI ,
MICHAEL J. BREAR  and
WILLIAM H. MOASE
NADER KARIMI
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
MICHAEL J. BREAR
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
WILLIAM H. MOASE
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the budgets of acoustic energy and Myers' second-order ‘disturbance energy’ in a simple inhomogeneous flow with heat communication. The flow considered is non-diffusive and one-dimensional, with excitation by downstream-travelling acoustic and entropic disturbances. Two forms of heat communication are examined: a case with only steady heat communication and another in which unsteady heat addition cancels the generation of entropy disturbances throughout the inhomogeneous region.

It is shown that significant entropic disturbances are usually generated at low frequency when a flow with steady heat communication is excited either acoustically or entropically. However, for acoustic excitation and regardless of the form of heat communication, entropic disturbances are not created at high frequency, inferring that all source terms create mainly sound in this limit. A general method is therefore proposed for determining an approximate frequency beyond which the generation of entropy disturbances can be ignored, and the disturbance energy flux then approximates the acoustic energy flux. This frequency is shown to depend strongly on the problem under investigation, which is expected to have practical significance when studying sound generation and propagation in combusting flows in particular. Further, sound is shown to be generated by fluid motion experiencing only steady heat communication, which is consistent with the known mechanism of sound generation by the acceleration of density disturbances.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 597 , 25 February 2008 , pp. 67 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloxsidge, G. J., Dowling, A. P., Hooper, N. & Langhorne, P. J. 1988 Active control of reheat buzz. AIAA J. 26, 783–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candel, S. M. 1975 Acoustic conservation principles and an application to plane and modal propagation and diffusers. J. Sound Vib. 41, 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candel, S. M., Defillipi, F. & Launay, A. 1980 a Determination of the inhomogeneous structure of a medium from its plane wave reflection response, part I: A numerical analysis of the direct problem. J. Sound Vib. 68, 571–582.Google Scholar
Candel, S. M., Defillipi, F. & Launay, A. 1980 b Determination of the inhomogeneous structure of a medium from its plane wave reflection response, part II: A numerical approximation. J. Sound Vib. 68, 583–595.Google Scholar
Cantrell, R. H. & Hart, R. W. 1964 Acoustic energy in non-uniform flows. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, B. T. 1965 On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow. Acta Mech. 1, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, P. E. 1989 Momentum potential-theory of energy flux carried by momentum fluctuations. J. Sound Vib. 131, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowling, A. P. 1995 The calculation of thermoacoustic oscillations. J. Sound Vib. 180, 557–581.Google Scholar
Dowling, A. P. & Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1983 Sound and Sources of Sound. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ffwocs Williams, J. E. & Howe, M. S. 1975 The generation of sound by density inhomogeneities in low Mach number nozzle flows. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 207–232.Google Scholar
Giauque, A., Poinsot, T., Brear, M. J. & Nicoud, F. 2006 Budget of disturbance energy in gaseous reacting flows. In Proc. Summer Program 2006, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Howe, M. 1975 Contributions to the theory of aerodynamic sound, with application to excess jet noise and the theory of the flute. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 625–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenvey, P. L. 1989 The sound power from turbulence – a theory of exchange of energy between the acoustic and non-acoustic fields. J. Sound Vib. 131, 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically I. General theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211, 564–587.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1954 On sound generated aerodynamically II. Turbulence as a source of sound. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 211, 1–32.Google Scholar
Moase, W. H., Brear, M. J. & Manzie, C. 2007 The forced response of chocked nozzles and supersonic diffusers. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 281–304.Google Scholar
Morfey, C. L. 1971 Acoustic energy in non-uniform flows. J. Sound Vib. 14, 159–170.Google Scholar
Myers, M. K. 1986 An exact energy corollary for homentropic flow. J. Sound Vib. 109, 277–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, M. K. 1991 Transport of energy by disturbances in arbitrary steady flows. J. Fluid Mech. 226, 383–400.Google Scholar
Nicoud, F. & Poinsot, T. 2005 Thermoacoustic instabilities: should the Rayleigh criterion be extended to include entropy changes? Combust. Flame 142, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, G. C. 1984 Aerothermodynamics of Gas Turbine and Rocket Propulsion. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.Google Scholar
Pierce, A. D. 1989 Acoustics, An Introduction to its Physical Principles and Applications. Acoustical Society of America.Google Scholar
Poinsot, T. & Lele, S. 1992 Boundary conditions for direct simulation of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101, 104–129.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1878 The explanation of certain acoustical phenomena. Nature 18, 319–321.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1896 Theory of Sound. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sujith, R. I., Waldherr, G. A. & Zinn, B. T. 1995 An exact solution for one-dimensional acoustic fields in ducts with an axial temperature gradient. J. Sound Vib. 184, 389–402.Google Scholar
Tam, C. & Shen, H. 1993 Direct computation of nonlinear acoustic pulses using high-order finite difference schemes. AIAA Paper 93–4325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. & Webb, J. 1993 Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys 107, 262–281.Google Scholar