Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-55wx7 Total loading time: 0.582 Render date: 2021-02-25T13:39:39.176Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2007

FRANK M. BOS
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 2, PO. Box 5058, Delft, the Netherlands f.m.bos@tudelft.nl
D. LENTINK
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 2, PO. Box 5058, Delft, the Netherlands f.m.bos@tudelft.nl Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 40, PO. Box 338, Wageningen, the Netherlands
B. W. VAN OUDHEUSDEN
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 2, PO. Box 5058, Delft, the Netherlands f.m.bos@tudelft.nl
H. BIJL
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 2, PO. Box 5058, Delft, the Netherlands f.m.bos@tudelft.nl
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

The influence of different wing kinematic models on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering insect is investigated by means of two-dimensional time-dependent Navier–Stokes simulations. For this, simplified models are compared with averaged representations of the hovering fruit fly wing kinematics. With increasing complexity, a harmonic model, a Robofly model and two more-realistic fruit fly models are considered, all dynamically scaled at Re = 110. To facilitate the comparison, the parameters of the models were selected such that their mean quasi-steady lift coefficients were matched. Details of the vortex dynamics, as well as the resulting lift and drag forces, were studied.

The simulation results reveal that the fruit fly wing kinematics result in forces that differ significantly from those resulting from the simplified wing kinematic models. In addition, light is shed on the effect of different characteristic features of the insect wing motion. The angle of attack variation used by fruit flies increases aerodynamic performance, whereas the deviation is probably used for levelling the forces over the cycle.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Birch, J. M. & Dickinson, M. H. 2003 The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. J. Expl Biol. 206, 22572272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blondeaux, P., Fornarelli, F., Guglielmini, L., Triantafyllou, M. & Verzicco, R. 2005 Numerical experiments on flapping foils mimicking fish-like locomotion. Phys. Fluids 17, 113601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomphrey, R. J., Lawson, N. J., Taylor, G. K. & Thomas, A. L. R. 2006 Application of digital particle image velocimetry to insect aerodynamics: measurement of the leading-edge vortex and near wake of a hawkmoth. Exp. Fluids 40, 546554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodsky, A. K. 1994 The Evolution of Insect Flight. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, M., Liu, G. & Lam, K. 2001 Numerical simulation of flow past a rotationally oscillating cylinder. Computers & Fluids 30, 365392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, M. H. 1994 The effects of wing rotation on unsteady aerodynamic performance at low Reynolds number. J. Expl Biol. 192, 179206.Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. H. & Götz, K. G. 1993 Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Expl Biol. 174, 4564.Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 19541960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dong, H., Mittal, R., Bozkurttas, M. & Najjar, F. 2005 Wake structure and performance of finite aspect-ratio flapping foils. AIAA Paper 2005-81.Google Scholar
Ellington, C. P. 1984 The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. & Thomas, A. 1996 Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384, 626630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferziger, J. & Peric, M. 2002 Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edn. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, S. N., Sayaman, R. & Dickinson, M. H. 2003 The aerodynamics of free-flight maneuvers in Drosophila. Science 300, 295298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guglielmini, L. & Blondeaux, P. 2004 Propulsive efficiency of oscillating foils. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 23, 255278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmineau, E. & Queutey, P. 2002 A numerical simulation of vortex shedding from an oscillating circular cylinder. J. Fluids Struct. 16, 773794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, R. D. 1995 Details of the drag curve near the onset of vortex shedding. Phys. Fluids 7, 21022104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, C. 1988 Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Vol 1: Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hover, F., Haugsdal, Ø. & Triantafyllou, M. 2004 Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 19, 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isogai, K., Fujishiro, , Saitoh, T., Yamamoto, M., Yamasaki, M. & Matsubara, M. 2004 Unsteady three-dimensional viscous flow simulation of a dragonfly hovering. AIAA J. 42, 20532059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentink, D. & Gerritsma, M. 2003 Influence of airfoil shape on performance in insect flight. AIAA Paper 2003-3447.Google Scholar
Lewin, G. & Haj-Hariri, H. 2003 Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 492, 339362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. 1969 Hydromechanics of aquatic animal propulsion. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 1, 413446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H. & Kawachi, K. 1998 A numerical study of insect flight. J. Computat. Phys. 146, 124156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedro, G., Suleman, A. & Djilali, N. 2003 A numerical study of the propulsive efficiency of a flapping hydrofoil. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 42, 493526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramamurti, R. & Sandberg, W. 2002 A three-dimensional computational study of the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. J. Expl Biol. 205, 15071518.Google ScholarPubMed
Sane, S. P. & Dickinson, M. H. 2001 The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. J. Expl Biol. 204, 26072626.Google ScholarPubMed
Sane, S. P. & Dickinson, M. H. 2002 The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. J. Expl Biol. 205, 10871096.Google Scholar
Srygley, R. B. & Thomas, A. L. R. 2002 Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature 420, 660664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stojkovic, D., Breuer, M. & Durst, F. 2002 Effect of high rotation rates on the laminar flow around a circular cylinder. Phys. Fluids 14, 31603178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M. & Tang, J. 2002 Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. J. Expl Biol. 205, 5570.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z. J. 2000 a Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 22162219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. J. 2000 b Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. J., Birch, M. B. & Dickinson, M. H. 2004 Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments. J. Expl Biol. 207, 461474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weish-Fogh, T. & Jensen, M. 1956 Biology and physics of locust flight. Basic principles of insect flight: a critical review. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 239, 415458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, C. H. K. 1995 Vortex dynamics in the wake of a cylinder. In Fluid Vortices, Fluid Mechanics and its Applications (ed. Green, S. I.), chap 5. Kluwer.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 353 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Influence of wing kinematics on aerodynamic performance in hovering insect flight
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *