Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-q7jt5 Total loading time: 0.297 Render date: 2021-03-06T09:38:38.216Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Evolution of material surfaces in the temporal transition in channel flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Yaomin Zhao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Yue Yang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Applied Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Shiyi Chen
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Center for Applied Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China Department of Mechanics and Aerospace Engineering, South University of Science and Technology of China, Shenzhen 518055, China
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

We report a Lagrangian study on the evolution of material surfaces in the Klebanoff-type temporal transitional channel flow. Based on the Eulerian velocity field from the direct numerical simulation, a backward-particle-tracking method is applied to solve the transport equation of the Lagrangian scalar field, and then the isosurfaces of the Lagrangian field can be extracted as material surfaces in the evolution. Three critical issues for Lagrangian investigations on the evolution of coherent structures using material surfaces are addressed. First, the initial scalar field is uniquely determined based on the proposed criteria, so that the initial material surfaces can be approximated as vortex surfaces, and remain invariant in the initial laminar state. Second, the evolution of typical material surfaces initially from different wall distances is presented, and then the influential material surface with the maximum deformation is identified. Large vorticity variations with the maximum curvature growth of vortex lines are also observed on this surface. Moreover, crucial events in the transition can be characterized in a Lagrangian approach by conditional statistics on the material surfaces. Finally, the influential material surface, which is initially a vortex surface, is demonstrated as a surrogate of the vortex surface before significant topological changes of vortical structures. Therefore, this material surface can be used to elucidate the continuous temporal evolution of vortical structures in transitional wall-bounded flows in a Lagrangian perspective. The evolution of the influential material surface is divided into three stages: the formation of a triangular bulge from an initially disturbed streamwise–spanwise sheet, rolling up of the vortex sheet near the bulge ridges with the vorticity intensification and the generation and evolution of signature hairpin-like structures with self-induced dynamics of vortex filaments.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adrian, R. J. 2007 Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 19, 041301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bake, S., Fernholz, H. H. & Kachanov, Y. S. 2000 Resemblance of K- and N-regimes of boundary-layer transition at late stages. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 19, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bake, S., Meyer, D. G. W. & Rist, U. 2002 Turbulence mechanism in Klebanoff transition: a quantitative comparison of experiment and direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 459, 217243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. S. 2011 The hairpin vortex illusion. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 318, 062004.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. S. 2013 Vortex dynamics in transitional and turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 51, 18281842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blazevski, D. & Haller, G. 2014 Hyperbolic and elliptic transport barriers in three-dimensional unsteady flows. Physica D 273, 4662.Google Scholar
Borodulin, V. I., Gaponenko, V. R., Kachanov, Y. S., Meyer, D. G. W., Rist, U., Lian, Q. X. & Lee, C. B. 2002a Late-stage transitional boundary-layer structures. Direct numerical simulation and experiment. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 15, 317337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borodulin, V. I. & Kachanov, Y. S. 1988 Role of the mechanism of local secondary instability in K-breakdown of boundary layer. Izv. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Tekh. Nauk 18, 6577.Google Scholar
Borodulin, V. I., Kachanov, Y. S. & Koptsev, D. B. 2002b Experimental study of resonant interactions of instability waves in a self-similar boundary layer with an adverse pressure gradient: I. Tuned resonances. J. Turbul. 3, 138.Google Scholar
Borodulin, V. I., Kachanov, Y. S. & Roschektayev, A. P. 2006 Turbulence production in an APG-boundary-layer transition induced by randomized perturbations. J. Turbul. 7, 130.Google Scholar
Borodulin, V. I., Kachanov, Y. S. & Roschektayev, A. P. 2007 The deterministic wall turbulence is possible. In Advances in Turbulence XI. Proceedings of 11th EUROMECH European Turbulence Conference (ed. Palma, J. M. L. M. & Lopes, A. S.), pp. 176178. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brethouwer, G., Hunt, J. C. R. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 2003 Micro-structure and Lagrangian statistics of the scalar field with a mean gradient in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 193225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quateroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carino, E. R. & Brodkey, R. S. 1969 A visual investigation of the wall region in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, M. S., Perry, A. E. & Cantwell, B. J. 1990 A general classification of three-dimensional flow fields. Phys. Fluids A 2, 765777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crow, S. C. 1970 Stability theory for a pair of trailing vortices. AIAA J. 8, 21722179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasel, H., Thumm, A. & Bestek, H. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of transition in supersonic boundary layers: oblique breakdown. In Transition and Turbulent Compressible Flows (ed. Kral, L. D. & Zang, T. A.), pp. 7792. ASME.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. & Kleiser, L. 1990 Near-wall phenomena in transition to turbulence. In Near Wall Turbulence (ed. Kline, S. J. & Afgan, N. H.), pp. 727. Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Green, M. A., Rowley, C. W. & Haller, G. 2007 Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 111120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H., Borodulin, V. I., Kachanov, Y. S., Pan, C., Wang, J. J., Lian, Q. X. & Wang, S. F. 2010 Nature of sweep and ejection events in transitional and turbulent boundary layers. J. Turbul. 11, 151.Google Scholar
Haller, G. 2001 Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows. Physica D 149, 248277.Google Scholar
Haller, G. 2015 Lagrangian coherent structures. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 137162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hama, F. R. 1960 Boundary-layer transition induced by a vibrating ribbon on a flat plate. In Proc. Heat Transfer and Fluid Mech. Inst. (ed. Roshko, A., Sturtevant, B. & Bartz, D. R.), pp. 92105. Standford University Press.Google Scholar
Hama, F. R. & Nutant, J. 1963 Detailed flow-field observations in the transition process in a thick boundary layer. In Proc. Heat Transfer and Fluid Mech. Inst., pp. 7793. Standford University Press.Google Scholar
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. 1981 New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T.1984 Analysis of the subharmonic route to transition in boundary-layers. AIAA Paper 84-0009.Google Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 487526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Wray, A. A. & Moin, P. 1988 Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. In Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 2, vol. 1, pp. 193208. Center for Turbulence Research Report CTR-S88.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachanov, Y. S. 1994 Physical mechanism of laminar-boundary-layer transition. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 411482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachanov, Y. S., Kozlov, V. V. & Levchenko, V. Y. 1977 Nonlinear development of a wave in a boundary layer. Fluid Dyn. 12, 383390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1986 The structure of the vorticity field in turbulent channel flow. Part 2. Study of ensemble-averaged fields. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 339363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. D. 1987 Turbulent statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klebanoff, P. S., Tidstrom, K. D. & Sargent, L. M. 1962 The three-dimensional nature of boundary-layer instability. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiser, L. & Laurien, E. 1985 Three-dimensional numerical simulation of laminar–turbulent transition and its control by periodic disturbances. In Laminar–Turbulent Transition (ed. Kozlov, V. V.), pp. 2937. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleiser, L. & Zang, T. A. 1991 Numerical simulation of transition in wall-bounded shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 495537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. B. & Li, R. 2007 Dominant structure for turbulent production in a transitional boundary layer. J. Turbul. 8, 134.Google Scholar
Lee, C. B. & Wu, J. Z. 2008 Transition in wall-bounded flows. Appl. Mech. Rev. 61, 030802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeHew, J. A., Guala, M. & MeKeon, B. J. 2013 Time-resolved measurements of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 54, 1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 Introduction: boundary layer theory. In Laminar Boundary Layer Theory (ed. Rosenhead, L.), pp. 46113. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lozano-Durán, A. & Jiménez, J. 2014 Time-resolved evolution of coherent structures in turbulent channels: characterization of eddies and cascades. J. Fluid Mech. 759, 432471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, M. R. 1990 Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability. J. Comput. Phys. 86, 376413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1985 The structure of the vorticity field in turbulent channel flow. Part 1. Analysis of instantaneous fields and statistical correlations. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P., Leonard, A. & Kim, J. 1986 Evolution of a curved vortex filament into a vortex ring. Phys. Fluids 29, 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkovin, M. V. 1984 Bypass transition to turbulence and research desiderta. In Transition in Turbines, NASA Conf. Pub. 2386, pp. 162204.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullin, D. I. & Yang, Y. 2014 Whither vortex tubes? Fluid Dyn. Res. 46, 061418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rist, U. & Fasel, H. 1995 Direct numerical-simulation of controlled transition in a flat-plate boundary-layer. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 211248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandham, N. D. & Kleiser, L. 1992 The late stages of transition to turbulence in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 245, 319348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayadi, T., Hamman, C. W. & Moin, P. 2013 Direct numerical simulation of complete H-type and K-type transitions with implications for the dynamics of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 724, 480509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P., Li, Q., Örlü, R., Hussain, F. & Henningson, D. S. 2014 On the near-wall vortical structures at moderate Reynolds numbers. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 48, 7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P., Stolz, S. & Kleiser, L. 2004 LES of transitional flow using the approximate deconvolution model. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 25 (3), 549558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R., Moser, R. D. & Rogers, M. M. 1991 Spectral methods for the Navier–Stokes equations with one infinite and two periodic directions. J. Comput. Phys. 96, 297324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, J. M. 2013 Highlights from 50 years of turbulent boundary layer research. J. Turbul. 13, 170.Google Scholar
Wang, B.2015 The investigation on the shock wave/boundary–layer interaction and flow field organization. PhD thesis, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.Google Scholar
Willmarth, W. W. & Lu, S. S. 1972 Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Ma, H. Y. & Zhou, M. D. 2005 Vorticity and Vortex Dynamics. Springer.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, Y., Chen, C., Fu, H. & Liu, C. 2014 DNS study on ${\it\lambda}$ -vortex and vortex ring formation in flow transition at match number 0.5. J. Turbul. 15, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. & Pullin, D. I. 2010 On Lagrangian and vortex-surface fields for flows with Taylor–Green and Kida–Pelz initial conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 446481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. & Pullin, D. I. 2011a Evolution of vortex-surface fields in viscous Taylor–Green and Kida–Pelz flows. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 146164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y. & Pullin, D. I. 2011b Geometric study of Lagrangian and Eulerian structures in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 674, 6792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Pullin, D. I. & Bermejo-Moreno, I. 2010 Multi-scale geometric analysis of Lagrangian structures in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 654, 233270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y., Xia, Z., Shi, Y., Xiao, Z. & Chen, S. 2014 Constrained large-eddy simulation of laminar–turbulent transition in channel flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 095103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 247 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 6th March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Evolution of material surfaces in the temporal transition in channel flow
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Evolution of material surfaces in the temporal transition in channel flow
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Evolution of material surfaces in the temporal transition in channel flow
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *