Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:31:11.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Lottery-Demand-Based Explanation of the Beta Anomaly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2017

Turan G. Bali ,
Stephen J. Brown ,
Scott Murray  and
Yi Tang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The low (high) abnormal returns of stocks with high (low) beta, which we refer to as the beta anomaly, is one of the most persistent anomalies in empirical asset pricing research. This article demonstrates that investors’ demand for lottery-like stocks is an important driver of the beta anomaly. The beta anomaly is no longer detected when beta-sorted portfolios are neutralized to lottery demand, regression specifications control for lottery demand, or factor models include a lottery demand factor. The beta anomaly is concentrated in stocks with low levels of institutional ownership and it exists only when the price impact of lottery demand is concentrated in high-beta stocks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 52 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 2369 - 2397
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Recipient of the 2014 Jack Treynor Prize sponsored by the Q-Group (The Institute for Quantitative Research in Finance). We are grateful to Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor) and Alok Kumar and Mark Ready (the referees) for their extremely helpful comments and suggestions. We thank Vikas Agarwal, Senay Agca, Reena Aggarwal, Oya Altinkilic, Hadiye Aslan, Bill Baber, Jennie Bai, Malcolm Baker, Arik Ben Dor, Lee Biggerstaff, Kelly Brunarski, Colin Campbell, Preeti Choudhary, Jess Cornaggia, Ray da Silva Rosa, Richard DeFusco, Ozgur Demirtas, Donna Dudney, Kathleen Farrell, Stephen Figlewski, Geoffrey Friesen, Gerry Gay, John Geppert, William Goetzmann, Brad Goldie, Bruce Grundy, Jingling Guan, Brian Henderson, Tyler Henry, Jason Hsu, Dalida Kadyrzhanova, Andrew Karolyi, Haim Kassa, Omesh Kini, Allison Koester, Tunde Kovacs, Di Li, Yijia Lin, Hanno Lustig, Katie McDermott, Stanislava Nikolova, Terry Nixon, Manferd Peterson, Lee Pinkowitz, Chip Ryan, Rob Schoen, Shane Shepherd, Zhen Shi, Wei Tang, Gary Twite, Mary Elizabeth Thompson, Emre Unlu, Robert Van Order, Christian Wagner, Robert Whitelaw, Rohan Williamson, Jeff Wurgler, Steve Wyatt, Baozhong Yang, Jie Yang, Kamil Yilmaz, Jianfeng Yu, Yuzhao Zhang, Yichao Zhu, Yosef Zweibach, and seminar participants at the 2015 Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management; the 2015 Financial Management Association (FMA) Meeting; the 2015 FMA Applied Finance Conference; the 2015 ITAM Finance Conference; the 2015 Midwest Finance Association Meeting; the Spring 2015 Q-Group Seminar; the 2015 Society for Financial Studies Finance Cavalcade; the 2015 Western Finance Association Conference; Barclays, City University of New York; George Washington University; Georgetown University; Georgia State University; Koc University; Lancaster University; Miami University; Monash University; New York University; Sabanci University; the University of Melbourne; the University of Minho; the University of Nebraska–Lincoln; the University of South Australia; and the University of Western Australia for constructive comments that have substantially improved the paper. A previous version of this paper was titled “Betting against Beta or Demand for Lottery?”

References

Amihud, Y.“Illiquidity and Stock Returns: Cross-Section and Time-Series Effects.” Journal of Financial Markets, 5 (2002), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; and Yu, J.. “Lottery-Related Anomalies: The Role of Reference-Dependent Preferences.” Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2636610 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, A.; Hodrick, R. J.; Xing, Y.; and Zhang, X.. “The Cross-Section of Volatility and Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 259–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annaert, J.; De Ceuster, M.; and Verstegen, K.. “Are Extreme Returns Priced in the Stock Market? European Evidence.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 37 (2013), 3401–3411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., and Wurgler, J.. “The Risk Anomaly Tradeoff of Leverage.” Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2577948 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bali, T. G.; Cakici, N.; and Whitelaw, R. F.. “Maxing Out: Stocks as Lotteries and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 99 (2011), 427–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bali, T. G.; Peng, L.; Shen, Y.; and Tang, Y.. “Liquidity Shocks and Stock Market Reactions.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 1434–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T.. “Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 773–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, B. M., and Odean, T.. “Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2001), 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberis, N., and Huang, M.. “Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices.” American Economic Review, 98 (2008), 2066–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawa, V. S., and Lindenberg, E. B.. “Capital Market Equilibrium in a Mean-Lower Partial Moment Framework.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F.“Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing.” Journal of Business, 45 (1972), 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F.“Beta and Return.” Journal of Portfolio Management, 20 (1993), 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, F.; Jensen, M. C.; and Scholes, M. S.. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests.” In Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, Jensen, M. C., ed. New York, NY: Praeger (1972), 79–121.Google Scholar
Boyer, B.; Mitton, T.; and Vorkink, K.. “Expected Idiosyncratic Skewness.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 169–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carhart, M. M.“On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, J. N.; Lu, F.; and Whitelaw, R. F.. “The Real Value of China’s Stock Market.” Available at   https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2519886 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., and Lu, A.. “A Market-Based Funding Liquidity Measure.” Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2383457 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimson, E.“Risk Measurement When Shares Are Subject to Infrequent Trading.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, J. S.; Jiang, D.; and Peterson, D. R.. “Gambling Preference and the New Year Effect of Assets with Lottery Features.” Review of Finance, 16 (2011), 685–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; Brown, S. J.; and Goetzmann, W. N.. Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 9th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons (2014).Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427–465.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazzini, A., and Pedersen, L. H.. “Betting against Beta.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gârleanu, N., and Pedersen, L. H.. “Margin-Based Asset Pricing and Deviations from the Law of One Price.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 1980–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, B., and Kumar, A.. “Speculative Retail Trading and Asset Prices.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48 (2013), 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Siddique, A.. “Conditional Skewness in Asset Pricing Tests.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 1263–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, D.; Hsu, P.-H.; and Li, D.. “Innovative Efficiency and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 107 (2013), 632–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, D., and Teoh, S. H.. “Limited Attention, Information Disclosure, and Financial Reporting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (2003), 337–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jegadeesh, N., and Titman, S.. “Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency.” Journal of Finance, 48 (1993), 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.“Who Gambles in the Stock Market?” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 1889–1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A., and Lee, C.. “Retail Investor Sentiment and Return Comovements.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 2451–2486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.; Page, J. K.; and Spalt, O. G.. “Religious Beliefs, Gambling Attitudes, and Financial Market Outcomes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (2011), 671–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A.; Page, J. K.; and Spalt, O. G.. “Gambling and Comovement.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51 (2016), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newey, W. K., and West, K. D.. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica, 55 (1987), 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L., and Stambaugh, R. F.. “Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Political Economy, 111 (2003), 642–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruenzi, S., and Weigert, F.. “Crash Sensitivity and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Working Paper, University of Mannheim (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, M., and Williams, J. T.. “Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data.” Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (1977), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J.; Yu, J.; and Zhao, S.. “Investor Sentiment and Economic Forces.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 86 (2017), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shumway, T.“The Delisting Bias in CRSP Data.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (1992), 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkshäusl, C.“The MAX Effect: European Evidence.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 42 (2014), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H.; Yan, J.; and Yu, J.. “Reference-Dependent Preferences and the Risk–Return Trade-Off.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, A., and Gray, P.. “The MAX Effect: An Exploration of Risk and Mispricing Explanations.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 65 (2016), 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bali et al supplementary material 1

Bali et al supplementary material

Download Bali et al supplementary material 1(File)
File 470.5 KB