Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:31:12.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Canonical Correlation Analysis of Commercial Bank Asset/Liability Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Donald G. Simonson ,
John D. Stowe  and
Collin J. Watson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Commercial banks have been the subjects of a large body of empirical research employing regression and econometric models and discriminant analysis. The purpose of this paper is to empirically identify and describe relationships, including hedging behavior, between the asset side and the liability/capital side of the balance sheets of a cross-section of large U.S. banks. Canonical correlation analysis is the statistical technique that is employed. Unlike regression analysis which explains the behavior of a single dependent variable as a function of a set of independent variables, canonical correlation analysis relates two sets of variables. In the present case, one set of variables is the composition of the lefthand side of the balance sheet and the other set is the right-hand side. The variables used in this study are asset and liability/capital categories expressed as a proportion of total bank assets (i.e., a percentage breakdown of the balance sheet or a common size statement). These proportions are used in lieu of the more usual financial ratios and no information exogenous to the bank is employed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 125 - 140
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Bartlett, M. S. “The Statistical Significance of Canonical Correlations.” Biometrika, Vol. 32 (01 1941), pp. 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cliff, N., and Krus, D. J.. “Interpretation of Canonical Analysis: Rotated vs. Unrotated Solutions.” Psychometrika, Vol. 41 (03 1976), pp. 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Flannery, M. J. “Market Interest Rates and Commercial Bank Profitability: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 36 (12 1981), pp. 1085–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F.. “The Use of Canonical Correlation Analysis in Accounting Research.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 7 (Autumn 1980), pp. 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Fraser, D. R.; Phillips, W. Jr; and Rose, P. S.. “A Canonical Analysis of Bank Performance.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 9 (03 1974), pp. 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Green, P. E.; Halbert, M. H.; and Robinson, P. J.. “Canonical Analysis: An Exposition and Illustrative Application.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 12 (02 1975), pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
[7]Haley, C. W. “Interest Rate Risk and Bank Stock Values.” Unpublished manuscript presented to the annual meeting of the Southern Finance Association (11 1981).Google Scholar
[8]Hester, D. D. “An Empirical Examination of a Commercial Bank Loan Offer Function.” Yale Economic Essays, Vol. 2 (Spring 1962), pp. 3–57.Google Scholar
[9]Ho, T. S. Y., and Saunders, A.. “The Determinants of Bank Interest Margins: Theory and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 15 (11 1980), pp. 581–600.Google Scholar
[10]Hotelling, H. “The Most Predictable Criterion.” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 26 (02 1935), pp. 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hotelling, H.. “Relations between Two Sets of Variates.” Biometrika, Vol. 28 (12 1936), pp. 321–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Howard, D. S. “Dynamics of Interest Differential Earnings.” Managing the Liability Side of the Balance Sheet. NY: Citicorp(1979).Google Scholar
[13]Kaiser, H. F. “An Index Of Factorial Simplicity.” Psychometrika, Vol. 23 (09 1958), pp. 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Lambert, Z. V., and Durand, R. M.. “Some Precautions In Using Canonical Analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 12 (11 1975), pp. 468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Maisel, S. T., and Jacobson, R.. “Interest Rate Changes and Commercial Bank Revenues and Costs.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 13 (11 1978), pp. 687–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Olson, R. L.; Simonson, D. G.; Reber, S. R.; and Hempel, G. H.. “Management of Bank Interest Margins in the 1980's.” Magazine of Bank Administration, Vol. 56 (03, April, May, and June 1980).Google Scholar
[17]Perreault, W. D., and Spiro, R. L.. “An Approach For Improved Interpretation of Multivariate Analysis.” Decision Sciences, Vol. 9 (07 1978), pp. 402–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Pyle, D. H. “On the Theory of Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 26 (06 1971), pp. 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Rosenblum, H. “Interstate Rate Volatility, Regulation Q, and the Problems of Thrift Institutions.” Proceedings of a Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (1980), pp. 16–42.Google Scholar
[20]Simonson, D. G., and Hempel, G. H.. “Improving Gap Management as a Technique for Controlling Interest Rate Risk.” Journal of Bank Research, Vol. 13 (Summer 1982), pp. 109–115.Google Scholar
[21]Stewart, D., and Love, W.. “A General Canonical Correlation Index.” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 70 (09 1968), pp. 160–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[22]Stowe, J. D.; Watson, C. J.; and Robertson, T. D.. “Relationships between the Two Sides of the Balance Sheet: A Canonical Correlation Analysis.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 35 (09 1980), pp. 973–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Technical Notes. NY: Salomon Brothers (01 1981).Google Scholar