Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Service Representation in a Federal System: A Field Experiment

  • Peter John Loewen (a1) and Michael Kenneth MacKenzie (a2)

Abstract

Federal systems can also provide citizens with multiple avenues to obtain service representation. In shared issue areas, citizens are officially represented by two sets of politicians. When politicians are willing to cross jurisdictional boundaries, citizens might also obtain help or information from more than one set of politicians, even in areas of exclusive jurisdiction. We report an experiment designed to examine responses to requests for assistance in different issue areas. Our sample includes 202 Canadian politicians, each of whom received two requests for assistance from fictional constituents. We show that federal arrangements can enhance service representation. On average, politicians are as helpful on issues of shared jurisdiction as issues of exclusive jurisdiction. They are less helpful for issues outside of their jurisdiction. These results suggest that federal arrangements can work to provide citizens with multiple access points to their representative, even in areas that fall outside their representatives’ jurisdictional purviews.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All

We received helpful comments from Royce Koop, Don Green, Dan Butler, Daniel Rubenson, Paul Quirk, and participants at the workshop on parties and elections held at Memorial University in Fall 2010. The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network at doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KROGFV” (Loewen 2018). Loewen acknowledges financial support via start up funds from the Dean of the University of Toronto-Mississauga. We declare no material conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ayres, Ian and Siegelman, Peter. 1995. “Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car.” The American Economic Review 85 (3): 304–21.
Butler, Daniel M. and Broockman, David E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate Against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–77.
Butler, Daniel M. and Nickerson, David W.. 2011. “Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect How Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6 (1): 5583.
Butler, Daniel M. and Schofield, Emily. 2010. “Were Newspapers More Interested in Pro-Obama Letters to the Editor in 2008? Evidence from a Field Experiment.” American Politics Research 38 (2): 356–71.
Cutler, Fred. 2008. “Whodunnit? Voters and Responsibility in Canadian Federalism.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 41 (03): 627–54.
Docherty, David. 2005. Legislatures. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Ellickson, Mark C. and Whistler, Donald E.. 2001. “Explaining State Legislators’ Casework and Public Resource Allocations.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 553–69.
Eulau, Heinz and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–54.
Franks, C.E.S. 2007. “Members and Constituency Roles in the Canadian Federal System.” Regional and Federal Studies 17 (1): 2345.
Freeman, Patricia K. and Richardson, Lilliard E. Jr. 1996. “Explaining Variation in Casework Among State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 21 (1): 4156.
Halligan, John, Krause, Robert, Williams, Robert and Hawker, Geoffrey. 1988. “Constituency Service among Sub-National Legislators in Australia and Canada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1): 4963.
Herrick, Rebekah L. 2011. Representation and Institutional Design. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Jewell, Malcolm E. 1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Johannes, John R. 1980. “The Distribution of Casework in the US Congress: An Uneven Burden.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 5 (4): 517–44.
Loewen, Peter John. 2018. Replication Data for: Service Representation in a Federal System: A Field Experiment. (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KROGFV) Accessed October 13, 2018.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
McClendon, Gwyneth. 2016. “Race and Responsiveness: A Field Experiment with South African Politicians.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3 (1): 6074.
Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 74 (04): 1094–107.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Simeon, Richard. 2001. “Adaptability and Change in Federations.” International Social Science Journal 53 (167): 145–52.
Snyder, James M. and Ueda, Michiko. 2007. “Do Multimember Districts Lead to Free-Riding?Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 649–79.
Thomas, Paul E. J., Loewen, Peter John and MacKenzie, Michael K.. 2013. “Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Constituency Population and the Quality of Representation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 46 (02): 273–93.

Keywords

Service Representation in a Federal System: A Field Experiment

  • Peter John Loewen (a1) and Michael Kenneth MacKenzie (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed