Skip to main content Accessibility help

Coordination, Communication, and Information: How Network Structure and Knowledge Affect Group Behavior

  • Mathew D. McCubbins (a1) and Nicholas Weller (a2)


Communication is central to solving coordination problems in politics. In this paper, we show that both the communication network and what people know about the network structure affect coordination. Increases in the number of connections between people make coordination easier and so does increasing the amount of information people have about the structure. We also demonstrate that highly connected nodes in the network can facilitate coordination, but only if individuals have sufficient knowledge to identify the presence of these nodes. Our results suggest the importance of understanding network knowledge and its effects on behavior.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Bisbee, J. and Larson, J.. 2017. Testing Social Science Theories with Online Network Data: An Evaluation of External Validity. American Political Science Review 111(3): 502–21.
Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M. and Lazer, D. M. J.. 2004. Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity: Who Informs Whom in Washington Politics? Journal of Politics 66: 224–46.
Choi, S., Gale, D., Kariv, S. and Palfrey, T.. 2011. Network Architecture, Salience and Coordination. Games and Economics Behavior 73(1): 7690.
Chong, D. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Chong, D. 1993. Coordinating Demands for Social Change. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528(1): 126–41.
Chwe, M. 1998. Culture, Circles, and Commercials: Publicity, Common Knowledge, and Social Coordination. Rationality and Society 10(1): 4775.
Chwe, M. 1999. Structure and Strategy in Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 128–56.
Enemark, D., McCubbins, M. D. and Weller, N.. 2014. Knowledge and Networks: An Experimental Test of How Network Knowledge Affects Coordination. Social Networks 36: 122–33.
Freeman, L.C. 1992. Filling in the Blanks: A Theory of Cognitive Categories and the Structure of Social Affiliation. Social Psychology Quarterly 55(2) 118127.
Fowler, J., Heaney, M., Nickerson, D., Padgett, J. and Sinclair, B.. 2011. Causality in Political Networks. American Politics Research 39(2): 437–80.
Hanneman, R. and Riddle, M.. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
Kearns, M., Suri, S. and Montfort, N.. 2006. An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks. Science 313: 824827.
Kenney, M. 2007. From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and Terrorist Networks, Government Bureaucracies, and Competitive Adaptation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Klar, S. and Shmargad, Y.. 2017. The Effect of Network Structure on Preference Formation. Journal of Politics 79(2): 717–21.
Knoke, D. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Koger, G., Masket, S. and Noel, H.. 2009. Partisan Webs: Information Exchange and Party Networks. British Journal of Political Science 39: 633–53.
Krackhardt, D. 1987. Cognitive Social Structures. Social Networks 9: 109–34.
Kranton, R. and Bramoulle, Y.. 2007. Games Played on Networks. In The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks, eds. Bramoulle, Y., Gaelotti, A. and Rogers, B.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Larson, J. 2016. The Evolutionary Advantage of Limited Network Knowledge. Journal of Theoretical Biology 398: 43–51.
Lupia, A. and McCubbins, M. D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. 2011. After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State. Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 301–10.
McCubbins, M. D., Paturi, R. and Weller, N.. 2009. Connected Coordination: Network Structure and Group Coordination. American Politics Research 37(5): 899920.
McCubbins, M. D., Rodriguez, D. and Weller, N.. 2013. Cheap, Easy or Connected: The Conditions for Creating Group Coordination. Southern California Law Review 86(3): 495.
McCubbins, M. D. and Weller, N.. 2012. Effects of Network Structure on Costly Coordination. Association for Advancement of Artificial Intelligence Technical Report FS-12-08, Social Networks and Social Contagion, 37–43.
McCubbins, M. and Weller, N.. 2019. Replication Data for: Coordination, Communication, and Information: How Network Structure and Knowledge Affect Group Behavior. Harvard Dataverse, V3. doi: 10.7910/DVN/OR4R9O
Nicoll Victor, J., Montgomery, A. and Lubell, M. (eds.) 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Political Networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Patty, J. W. and Penn, E. Maggie. 2014. Sequential Decision-Making & Information Aggregation in Small Networks. Political Science Research & Methods 2(2): 243–71.
Ringe, N. and Victor, J. Nicoll. 2013. Bridging the Information Gap: Legislative Member Organizations in the United States and European Union, with Christopher J. Carman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Siegel, D. 2009. Social Networks and Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 122–38.
Simpson, B., Markovsky, B. and Steketee, M.. 2011. Power and the Perception of Social Networks. Social Networks 33(2): 166–71.
Sinclair, B. 2012. The Social Citizen: Peer Networks and Political Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Suri, S. and Watts, D. J.. 2011. Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments. PLoS ONE 6(3): e16836.
Tam Cho, W. K. and Fowler, J. H.. 2010. Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation. Journal of Politics 72(1): 125–35.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

McCubbins and Weller Dataset

Supplementary materials

McCubbins and Weller supplementary material
McCubbins and Weller supplementary material 1

 Word (39 KB)
39 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed