Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:44:18.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Campaign Mailers and Intent to Turnout: Do Similar Field and Survey Experiments Yield the Same Conclusions?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2019

David Doherty Open the ORCID record for David Doherty [Opens in a new window]  and
E. Scott Adler
David Doherty*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Road, Coffey Hall, 3rd Floor, Chicago, IL60660, USA
E. Scott Adler
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, University of Colorado – Boulder, Boulder, CO80309, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: ddoherty@luc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Replicationresearch designsurvey experimentfield experimentnegative advertisingturnout
Type
Short Report
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Summer 2020 , pp. 150 - 155
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

There are no conflicts of interest to report. The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at doi:10.7910/DVN/6FP9Z6.

References

Arceneaux, Kevin. 2010. The Benefits of Experimental Methods for the Study of Campaign Effects. Political Communication 27: 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabas, Jason and Jerit, Jennifer. 2010. Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid? American Political Science Review 104: 226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20: 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, David. 2018. Replication Data for: Campaign Mailers and Intent to Turnout: Do Similar Field and Survey Experiments Yield the Same Conclusions? Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6FP9Z6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, David and Adler, E. Scott. 2014. The Persuasive Effects of Partisan Campaign Mailers. Political Research Quarterly 67: 562–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined. Political Analysis 15: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Gimpel, James G., Green, Donald P., and Shaw, Daron R.. 2011. How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Political Science Review 105: 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, Barabas, Jason, and Clifford, Scott. 2013. Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 77:256–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald. 2007. Curmudgeonly Advice. Journal of Communication 57: 155–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna. 2011. When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout. American Journal of Political Science 55: 797–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna and Levine, Adam Seth. 2014. Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science 1: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna and Bauer, Nichole M.. 2014. The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context. Political Behavior 36: 167–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna and Piston, Spencer. 2015. Accentuating the Negative: Candidate Race and Campaign Strategy. Political Communication 32: 152–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R. and Rovner, Ivy Brown. 2009. Negative Campaigning. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy Brown. 2007. The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment. Journal of Politics 69: 1176–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N., and Freese, Jeremy. 2015. The Generalizability of Survey Experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2: 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Doherty and Adler Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/6FP9Z6
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Doherty and Adler supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Doherty and Adler supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 223.9 KB