Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:50:02.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Transformation of the American Office: Changes in Employment and Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Elyce J. Rotella
Affiliation:
Visiting Assistant Professor of Economics, Wellesley College, and Assistant Professor of Economics and Women's Studies, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182

Abstract

Between 1870 and 1930 production methods in American offices changed substantially as mechanical devices were introduced and work was subdivided and routinized. This paper explores connections between these technological advances and changes in clerical emplyment, particularly the employment of women in offices. A close correspondence is found between the timing of changes in the sex composition of clerical employment and the adoption of new techniques. It is argued that the new technology led to increased hiring of female clerical workers by reducing the form-specific skill requirements for clerical jobs.

Type
Papers Presented at the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a more complete treatment of the history of the U.S. clerical labor force see Rotella, Elyce J., From Home to Office: U.S. Women at Work, 1870–1930 (forthcoming, 1981).Google Scholar

2 See for examples Oppenheimer, Valerie K., The Female Labor Force in the United States (Berkeley, CA, 1970), pp. 64120;Google ScholarGross, Edward, “Plus ça change …Social Problems, 16 (Fall 1968);Google ScholarEconomic Report of the President, 1973 (Wahington, D. C., 1973), pp. 89–112.Google Scholar

3 For a discussion of the many other factors contributing to the change in the sex composition of clerical employment, see Rotella, From Home to Office.Google Scholar

4 Much of the description of the early office is summarized from Lockwood, David, The Black-Coated Worker (London, 1958).Google Scholar

5 Houlston's Industrial Library, no. 7, The Clerk: A Sketch and Outline of His Duties and Discipline (London, 1878).Google Scholar

6 Current, Richard N., The Typewriter and the Men Who Made It (Urbana, IL, 1954), p. 68.Google Scholar

7 For a history of commercial education in the United States, see Weiss, Janice H., Educating for Clerical Work: A History of Commercial Education in the United States (Ed. D. dissertation, Harvard University, 1979).Google Scholar

8 Bliven, Bruce, The Wonderful Writing Machine (New York, 1954), pp. 132–33;Google ScholarBoorstin, Daniel J., The Americans: The Democratic Experience (New York, 1973), p. 172;Google ScholarTypewriter Trade Journal (September 1904), 5.Google Scholar

9 Mills, C. Wright, White Collar (New York, 1951), p. 193.Google Scholar

10 Orchard, B. G., The Clerks of Liverpool (1871).Google Scholar

11 For discussion of the theoretical and empirical issues involved in this argument, see Rotella, From Home to Office.Google Scholar

12 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, MA, 1962), pp. 145–53.Google Scholar

13 For more detailed discussion, see Rotella, From Home to Office.Google Scholar

14 Baker, Elizabeth Faulkner, Technology and Women's Work (New York, 1964), p. 73.Google Scholar

15 Smith, Judith, “The ‘New woman’ Knows How to Type: Some Connections between Sexual Ideology and Clerical Work, 1900–1930,” paper presented at the Berkshire Conference on Woman's History, Cambridge, MA, 1974.Google Scholar

16 Boserup, Ester, Women's Role in Economic Development (New York, 1970), pp. 1516.Google Scholar

17 Becker, Gary, Human Capital (New York, 1964), pp. 1159.Google ScholarPubMed

18 For a discussion of this model and an evaluation of its usefulness for understanding the current labor market position of women, see Lloyd, Cynthia B. and Niemi, Beth T., The Economics of Sex Differentials (New York, 1979), pp. 122–47.Google Scholar

19 For examples, see Women's Educational and Industrial Union of Boston, The Public Schools and Women in Office Service (Boston, 1914), p. 78;Google ScholarNational Industrial Conference Board, Clerical Salaries in the United States (New York, 1926), p. 11.Google Scholar

20 Galloway, Lee, Office Management: Its Principles and Practice (New York, 1919), p. 84.Google Scholar