Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:51:27.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Defense of “Commons Sense”: Reply to Chapman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Gregory Clark
Gregory Clark
Affiliation:
Professor, Departnient of Economics, University of Califomia, Davis, CA 95616-8578.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 451 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chapman, John. “The Extent and Nature of Parliamentary Enclosure.” Agriculrural Histoiy Review 35, no. 1 (1987): 25–35.Google Scholar
Chapman, John, and Seeliger, Sylvia. “Formal Agreements and the Enclosure Process: the Evidence from Hampshire.” Agricultural History Review 43 (1995): 35–46.Google Scholar
Chapman, John, and Seeliger, Sylvia. “Open Fields and their Disappearance in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: The Evidence from Sussex.” Southern History 17 (1995): 88–97.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory “Commons Sense: Common Property Rights, Efficiency, and Institutional Change.” this JOURNAL 58, no. 2 (1998): 73–102.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory, and Clark, Anthony. “A Sampling Approach to History: The Enclosure of English Common Lands.” Agricultural History Center, University of California, Davis. Working Paper No. 94. 08, 1998.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, House of Commons. “Reports of the Charity Commissioners, Vol. 1.” Sessional Papers, 1819. Vol. 10-A.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, House of Commons. “Reports of the Charity Commissioners, Vol. 3.” Sessional Papers, 1820. Vol. 4.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, House of Commons. “Reports of the Charity Commissioners, Vol. 11.” Sessional Papers, 1824. Vol. 14.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, House of Commons. “Reports of the Charity Commissioners, Vol. 13.” Sessional Papers, 1825. Vol. 11.Google Scholar
United Kingdom, House of Commons. “Reports of the Charity Commissioners, Vol. 31.” Sessional Papers, 1837–1838. Vol. 24.Google Scholar