Skip to main content Accessibility help

Female labor force participation and fertility differentials

  • Irakli Japaridze (a1)


US women, on average, had approximately two children in both the 1930s and in the 1970s, yet the fertility distribution in the 1930s was less concentrated. This implies change in reproductive behavior, which cannot be captured by models focusing on average fertility. To explain these changes, I have developed a model that makes a distinction between sons and daughters. In this model, the female labor force participation rate is the probability of each girl becoming an employed woman. This endogenizes the empirically observed difference in the propensity for an all-girl household to have another child compared to an all-boy household, generating large fertility differentials at low participation rates. Higher participation rates raise the expected return from an additional child, as well as the expected return from existing daughters. The first effect tends to increase fertility, while the second effect, for relatively concave utility functions, tends to decrease it, so that the distribution of completed fertilities becomes more concentrated.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Aaronson, D., Lange, F. and Mazumder, B. (2014) Fertility transitions along the extensive and intensive margins. American Economic Review 104(11), 37013724.
Albanesi, S. and Sahin, A. (2018) The gender unemployment gap. Published on VOX, CEPR Policy Portal (, January.
Angrist, J. and Evans, W. (1998) Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review 88(3), 450477.
Bar, M., Hazan, M., Leukhina, O., Weiss, D. and Zoabi, H. (2015) Higher Inequality, Higher Education? The Changing Role of Differential Fertility. The Pinhas Sapir Center for Development, Tel Aviv University, Discussion Paper No. 2–15,
Bailey, M. and Hershbein, B. (2018) US fertility rates and childbearing, 1800 to 2010. Chapter 3 in “Oxford Handbook of American Economic History” by L. Cain, P. Fishback and P. W. Rhode (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Baudin, T., de la Croix, D. and Gobbi, P. (2015) Fertility and childlessness in the United States. American Economic Review 105(6), 18521882.
Ben-Porath, Y. and Welch, F. (1976) Do Sex preferences really matter? Quarterly Journal of Economics 90(2), 285307.
Birchenall, J. and Soares, R. (2009) Altruism, fertility, and the value of children: health policy evaluation and intergenerational welfare. Journal of Public Economics 93(1–2), 280295.
Dahl, G. and Moretti, E. (2008) The demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies 75(4), 10851120.
de la Croix, D. and Doepke, M. (2003) Inequality and growth: why differential fertility matters. American Economic Review 93(4), 10911113.
Echevarria, C. and Merlo, A. (1999) Gender differences in education in a dynamic household bargaining model. International Economic Review 40(2), 265286.
Fitch, C. and Ruggles, S. (2000) Historical trends in marriage formation, United States 1850–1990. Chapter 4 in “The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation” by L. Waite , Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 404 pages.
Galindev, R. (2011) Leisure goods, education attainment and fertility choice. Journal of Economic Growth 16(2), 157181.
Galor, O. and Weill, D. (2000) Population, technology, and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. The American Economic Review 90(4), 806828.
Gobbi, P. (2013) A model of voluntary childlessness. Journal of Population Economics 26(3), 963982.
Hazan, M. and Zoabi, H. (2015) Sons or daughters? Endogenous sex preferences and the reversal of the gender educational gap. Journal of Demographic Economic 81(2), 179201.
Iyigun, M. and Lafortune, J. (2016) Why Wait? A Century of Education, Marriage Timing and Gender Roles. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 9671.
Jones, L. and Tertilt, M. (2008) Chapter 5: An economic history of fertility in the United States: 1826–1960. Frontiers of Family Economics 1, 165230.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S. (2003) A stochastic model of mortality, fertility, and human capital investment. Journal of Development Economics 70(1), 103118.
King, M., Ruggles, R., Alexander, J. T., Flood, S., Genadek, K., Schroeder, M., Trampe, T. and Vick, R. (2010) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 3.0. [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Larsen, U. (2000) Primary and secondary infertility in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Epidemiology 29(2), 285291.
Leland, H. (1968) Saving and uncertainty: the precautionary demand for saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics 82(3), 465473.
Mills, M. and Begall, K. (2010) Preferences for the sex-composition of children in Europe: a multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child. Population Studies 64(1), 7795.
McClelland, G. (1979) Determining of the impact of sex preferences on the fertility: a consideration of parity progression ratio, dominance, and stopping rule measures. Demography 16(3), 377388.
McDougall, J., DeWit, D. and Ebanks, G. (1999) Parental preferences for sex of children in Canada. Sex Roles 41(7–8), 615626.
Olivetti, C. and Albanesi, S. (2010) Maternal Health and the Baby Boom. Boston University, Department of Economics - Working Papers Series WP2010-044, Boston University, Department of Economics.
Pollard, M. and Morgan, S. (2002) Emerging parental gender indifference? Sex composition of children and the third birth. American Sociological Review 67(4), 600613.
Portner, C. (2001) Children as insurance. Journal of Population Economics 14(1), 119136.
Rosati, F. (1996) Social security in a non-altruistic model with uncertainty and endogenous fertility. Journal of Public Economics 60(2), 283294.
Rosenblum, D. (2013) The effect of fertility decisions on excess female mortality in India. Journal of Population Economics 26(1), 147180.
Sah, R. (1991) The effects of child mortality changes on fertility choice and parental welfare. Journal of Political Economy 99(3), 582606.
Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V. and Philipov, D. (2011) Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review 37(2), 267306.


JEL classification

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Female labor force participation and fertility differentials

  • Irakli Japaridze (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.