Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:03:50.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Proteinase and phospholipase activities and development at different temperatures of yeasts isolated from bovine milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2011

Priscilla A Melville*
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Nilson R Benites
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Monica Ruz-Peres
Affiliation:
Max Planck Veterinary Medicine Facility, Indaiatuba, São Paulo, Brazil
Eugenio Yokoya
Affiliation:
Department of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechny, University of São Paulo, Brazil
*
*For correspondence; e-mail:melville@usp.br

Abstract

The presence of yeasts in milk may cause physical and chemical changes limiting the durability and compromising the quality of the product. Moreover, milk and dairy products contaminated by yeasts may be a potential means of transmission of these microorganisms to man and animals causing several kinds of infections. This study aimed to determine whether different species of yeasts isolated from bovine raw milk had the ability to develop at 37°C and/or under refrigeration temperature. Proteinase and phospholipase activities resulting from these yeasts were also monitored at different temperatures. Five genera of yeasts (Aureobasidium sp., Candida spp., Geotrichum spp., Trichosporon spp. and Rhodotorula spp.) isolated from bovine raw milk samples were evaluated. All strains showed one or a combination of characteristics: growth at 37°C (99·09% of the strains), psychrotrophic behaviour (50·9%), proteinase production (16·81% of the strains at 37°C and 4·09% under refrigeration) and phospholipase production (36·36% of the isolates at 37°C and 10·9% under refrigeration), and all these factors may compromise the quality of the product. Proteinase production was similar for strains incubated at 37°C (16·81% of the isolates) and room temperature (17·27%) but there was less amount of phospholipase-producing strains at room temperature (15·45% of the isolates were positive) when compared with incubation at 37°C (36·36%). Enzymes production at 37°C by yeasts isolated from milk confirmed their pathogenic potential. The refrigeration temperature was found to be most efficient to inhibit enzymes production and consequently ensure better quality of milk. The viability of yeasts and the activity of their enzymes at different temperatures are worrying because this can compromise the quality of dairy products at all stages of production and/or storage, and represent a risk to the consumer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barret-Bee, K, Hayes, Y, Wilson, RB & Ryley, JF 1985 A comparison of phospholipase activity, cellular adherence and pathogenicity of yeasts. Journal of General Microbiology 131 12171221Google Scholar
Bullerman, LB 1981 Public health significance of molds and mycotoxins in fermented dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science 64 24392452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, RS, Prajapati, PS, Jana, A, Hingu, M, Chavan, SR & Khedkar, CD 2010 Influence of storage period and temperature on physico-chemical properties and microbial quality of dietetic and diabetic rosogolla. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23 628631Google Scholar
Chen, L, Daniel, RM & Coolbear, T 2003 Detection and impact of protease and lipase activities in milk and milk powders. International Dairy Journal 13 255275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déak, T 1991 Foodborne yeasts. Advances in Applied Microbiology 36 179278CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolan, JW, Bell, AC, Hube, B, Schaller, M, Warner, T & Balish, E 2004 Candida albicans PLD1 activity is required for full virulence. Medical Mycology 42 439447CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleet, GH & Mian, MA 1987 The occurrence and growth of yeasts in dairy products. International Journal of Food Microbiology 4 145155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graphpad Instat (1992–1998). Software used for statistical analysisGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M & Narvhus, J 1996 Yeasts and their possible beneficial and negative effects on the quality of dairy products. International Dairy Journal 6 755–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khozel, TR 1995 Virulence factors of Cryptococcus neoformans. Trends in Microbiology 3 295299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga-Ito, CY, Lyon, JP, Vidotto, V & Resende, MA 2006 Virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans isolates from oral candidosis patients and control individuals. Mycopathologia 161 219223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreeger-Van-Rig, NJW 1984 The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 3rd Edn.Amsterdan: Elsevier Science PublisherGoogle Scholar
Kumar, CPG, Kumar, SSJ & Menon, T 2006 Phospholipase and proteinase activities of clinical isolates of Candida from immunocompromised patients. Mycopathologia 161 213218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtzman, CP & Fell, JW 1998 The Yeasts: A Taxonomic Study, 4th Edn.New York: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
Kwon-Chung, KJ & Bennett, JE 1992 Medical Mycology. Philadelphia: Lea FebigerGoogle Scholar
Lacaz, CS, Porto, E, Martins, JEC, Heins-Vaccari, EM & Melo, NT 2002 Tratado de Micologia Médica [Treaty of Medical Mycology]. 9th Edn.São Paulo, Brazil: Sarvier. 1104pGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, F & Odds, FC 1983 Virulence for mice of a proteinase secreting strain of Candida albicans and a proteinase deficient mutant. Journal of General Microbiology 129 431438Google Scholar
Melville, PA, Ruz-Peres, M, Yokoya, E & Benites, NR 2006 Occurrence of fungi in raw milk from bulk tanks, milk cans of dairy farms and milk sold directly to the consumer. Available: <http://www.biologico.sp.gov.br/rev_arq.php?vol=73&num=3> Access: 11/11/2010+Access:+11/11/2010>Google Scholar
Minervini, F, Montagna, MT, Spilotros, G, Monaci, L, Santacroce, MP & Visconti, A 2001 Survey on mycoflora of cow and buffalo dairy products from Southern Italy. International Journal of Food Microbiology 69 141146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, PR, Baron, EJ, Pfaller, M, Jorgensen, JH & Yolken, RH 2003 Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th Edn.Washington: American Society for MicrobiologyGoogle Scholar
Price, MF, Wilkinson, ID & Gentry, LO 1982 Plate method for detection of phospholipase activity in Candida albicans. Sabouraudia 20 714CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roostita, R & Fleet, GH 1996 Growth of yeasts in milk and associated changes to milk composition. International Journal of Food Microbiology 31 205219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruz-Peres, M, Yokoya, E, Benites, NR & Melville, PA 2010 Resistance of moulds and yeasts isolated from bovine raw milk to pasteurization and boiling. Available: <http://www.fmvz.unesp.br/revista/volumes/vol17_n1/VZ17_1(2010)_62-70.pdf> Access: 11/11/2010+Access:+11/11/2010>Google Scholar
Sorhaug, T & Stepaniak, L 1997 Psychrotrophs and their enzymes in milk and dairy products: quality aspects. Trends in Food Science & Technology 8 3541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanamberg, A, Hartffelder, C, Fuentefria, AM & Valente, P 2004 Diversity and enzyme production by yeasts isolated from raw milk in Southern Brazil. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae 32 195199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, ECD 1983 Foodborne disease in Canada - a five year summary. Journal of Food Protection 46 650657CrossRefGoogle Scholar