Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T01:45:29.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interruption of machine milking in dairy cows: effects on intramammary pressure and milking characteristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Hans-Ulrich Pfeilsticker ,
Rupert M. Bruckmaier  and
Jürg W. Blum
Hans-Ulrich Pfeilsticker
Affiliation:
Institut fü Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
Rupert M. Bruckmaier
Affiliation:
Institut fü Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
Jürg W. Blum
Affiliation:
Institut fü Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments were designed to test the hypothesis that milk ejection rate decreases during milking, thereby causing insufficient refill of the cistern and decreasing milk flow rate towards the end of milking. In a first series of experiments machine milking of the left front quarters of 11 cows was interrupted for 2 min after removal of 25, 50 or 75% of expected total milk yield, while milking was continued in the other three quarters. Milk flow was recorded during machine-on times. Intramammary pressure (IMP) was recorded during premilking teat stimulation and during interruption of milking. IMP during interruption of milking decreased with decreasing amounts of milk remaining in the udder. The IMP did not change during these interruptions when they occurred after 25 and 50% of expected total milk yield was removed. Thus, the ejection rate could keep up with the milk flow or removal rate. However, IMP increased during interruption of milking following removal of 75% of total yield, although significantly so only in cows with a high milk flow rate. Obviously, more milk was removed than was transported to the cisternal cavity. It is likely that a reduced ejection rate caused the decreased milk flow rate. In a second series of experiments the pulsation ratio of the milking machine was changed from the usual 70:30 to 50:50 with the aim of reducing the milk flow rate and thus adapting to the ejection rate at the end of milking. The changed pulsation ratio caused a reduced peak flow rate and a prolonged high milk flow period, whereas the main flow rate did not change significantly.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , November 1995 , pp. 559 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreae, U. 1958 [Measurements of the teat canal of cows to determine the ease of milking.] Zeitschrift für Tierziichtüng und Zuchtungsbiologie 71 289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckmaier, R. M. 1988 [Oxytocin Release, Intramammary Pressure and Milk Production in the Cow in Relation to Stage of Lactation and Effect of the Adrenergic System.] Thesis, Technische Universitat Münchcn, Weihenstephan, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Bruckmaier, R. M. & Blum, J. W. 1992 B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergic agonist and oxytocin administration. Journal of Dairy Research 59 151–159Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, R. M., Mayer, H. & Schams, D. 1991 Effects of α- and β-adrenergic agonists on intramammary pressure and milk flow in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 411–419Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, R. M., Schams, D. & Blum, J. W. 1994 Continuously elevated concentrations of oxytocin during milking are necessary for complete milk removal in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 61 323–334CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, R. M., Schams, D. & Mayer, H. 1992 [Stimulation, free oxytocin, intramammary pressure and milk flow in cattle: dependence on stage of lactation.] In Beiträge zum internationalen Kolloquium “Stimulation und Melken”, Grimma, GermanyGoogle Scholar
Butler, M. C., Hillerton, J. E. & Grindal, R. J. 1992 The control of milk flow through the teats of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 75 1019–1024Google Scholar
Essl, A. 1987 Statistische Methoden in der Tierproduktion. Vienna: Österreichiseh AgrarverlagGoogle Scholar
Gorewit, R. C. 1979 Method for determining oxytocin concentrations in unextracted sera: characterization in lactating cattle. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 160 80–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammon, H. M., Bruckmaier, R. M., Honegger, U. E. & Blum, J. W. 1994 Distribution and density of α- and β-adrenergic receptor binding sites in the bovine mammary gland. Journal of Dairy Research 61 47–57Google Scholar
Knight, C. H., Hirst, D. & Dewhurst, R. J. 1994 Milk accumulation and distribution in the bovine udder during the interval between milkings. Journal of Dairy Research 61 167–177Google Scholar
Mayer, H., Bruckmaier, R. M. & Schams, D. 1991 Lactational changes in oxytocin release, intramammary pressure and milking characteristics in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 159–169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, H., Schams, D., Worstorff, H. & Prokopp, A. 1984 Secretion of oxytocin and milk removal as affected by milking cows with and without manual stimulation. Journal of Endocrinology 103 355–361Google Scholar
Mihina, Š., Janci, P., Tongel′, P. & Novosedlíková, I. 1990 [Control of milking machine pulsation.] Zemedelska Technika 36 475–481Google Scholar
Roets, E. & Peeters, G. 1985 Identification and characterization of 3H-prazosin binding to α1-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamic et de Thérapie 275 189–198Google Scholar
Roets, E., Peeters, G. & Leysen, J. E. 1984 Identification of β-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles by 3H-dihydroalprenolol binding. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamic et de Thérapie 270 203–214Google ScholarPubMed
SAS 1990 SAS Users′ Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Schams, D., Mayer, H., Prokopp, A. & Worstorff, H. 1984 Oxytocin secretion during milking in dairy cows with regard to the variation and importance of a threshold level for milk removal. Journal of Endocrinology 102 337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. V., Force, D. K., Bremel, D. H. & Strasser, S. 1991 Effects of pulsation ratio, pulsation rate, and teatcup liner design on milking rate and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 74 1243–1249Google Scholar
Whittlestone, W. G. 1955 Intramammary pressure changes in the lactating cow. I. Changes during the milking process. Journal of Dairy Research 22 290–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. M. & Mein, G. A. 1987 Closing forces of the bovine teat canal. Journal of Dairy Research 54 321–325Google Scholar