Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:03:30.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interquarter comparison of markers of subclinical mastitis: somatic cell count, electrical conductivity, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and antitrypsin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Niels Einar Jensen
Affiliation:
National Veterinary Laboratory 2 Hangøvej, DK-8200 Århus N, Denmark
Kim Knudsen
Affiliation:
Statistical Research Unit, University of Copenhagen, 3 Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Summary

We have evaluated the usefulness in mastitis diagnostics of new diagnostic measures using the continuous nature of the variation in quarter milk samples of four inflammatory markers: somatic cell count, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase (EC 3.2.1.30), electrical conductivity and antitrypsin. A two-way analysis of variance was performed for each of the inflammatory markers on results from 273 cows sampled six times at 14 d intervals. Adjustment for the individual cow's mean removed approximately half the total variation for all four markers, indicating that comparisons in marker levels between quarters without taking the cows' overall level into account, as is done in diagnostic keys based on fixed threshold, is a rash procedure. After adjusting for the individual cow means, the total variation of the marker observations was partitioned in three sources of variation: between the four quarter levels, between different sampling days, and the experimental error, i.e. the variation within each quarter over-the study period. As expected, the variation between quarters accounted for the largest percentage of the variation (44–65%). In contrast the variation between days was only 16–34% and of the same magnitude as the experimental error. These figures can profitably be taken into account when designing experiments in future mastitis research studies. They imply that mastitis diagnostics based on quarter milk samples collected over time will be influenced only slightly by random biological variation and that the same relative differences that exist in marker levels between the four quarters of a cow as a rule will be disclosed irrespective of sampling day. Thus, the udder health state is relatively stable when determined by these inflammatory markers. In addition to simple correlations between markers measured on the same day, correlations of the logarithm of the interquarter ratios and of the experimental errors were computed. Stronger associations between the markers emerged and these correlations reflect more precisely than simple correlations the real diagnostic relations of the markers.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Emanuelson, U., Olsson, T., Holmberg, O., Hageltorn, M., Mattila, T., Nelson, L. & Åström, G. 1987 Comparison of some screening tests for detecting mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 70 880887CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Dairy Federation 1987 Bovine mastitis, definition and guidelines for diagnosis. International Dairy Federation Bulletin Document 211Google Scholar
Jensen, N. E. & Knudsen, K. 1988 Variation in measures of udder health within a short period of time. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 29 421430CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, K. & Jensen, N. E. 1990 The diagnosis of subclinical mastitis by redefinition of the interquarter ratio and definition of the interquarter variation using analysis of variance methods. Journal of Dairy Research 57 325330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattila, T. 1985 Diagnostic problems in bovine mastitis. Dissertation. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
Sandholm, M. 1983 Milk antitrypsin assay: a novel method of screening for mastitis. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of the World Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Ames, IA Vol. 2 pp. 571576Google Scholar