Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T00:09:47.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indian dairy farmers' willingness to pay for sexed semen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2020

Kumari Vijaya Sneh Verma ,
Sanchita Garai ,
Sanjit Maiti ,
B. S. Meena ,
Mukesh Bhakat  and
K. S. Kadian
Kumari Vijaya Sneh Verma
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
Sanchita Garai*
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
Sanjit Maiti
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
B. S. Meena
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
Mukesh Bhakat
Affiliation:
Livestock Production and Management section, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
K. S. Kadian
Affiliation:
Division of Dairy Extension, ICAR-NDRI, Karnal, 132001, Haryana, India
*
Author for correspondence: Sanchita Garai, Email: sanchita.bckv@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sexed semen is one of the newest reproductive technologies available for dairy farmers and can fulfil their desire to produce a high percentage of female calves. The present study was designed to define the willingness of Indian dairy farmers to pay for sexed semen. Hence, 120 small holder dairy farmers and 90 commercial dairy farmers were randomly selected from Karnal and Yamunanagar districts in North-western Haryana, where there is a high proportion of crossbred dairy cattle. Willingness to pay for sexed semen was evaluated by a contingent valuation method and its determinants by an interval regression model. The majority of the small holder dairy farmers (81.67%) were willing to pay for sexed semen and they were ready to pay around INR 340 per sexed semen straw. Almost all (99%) of the commercial dairy farmers were willing to pay around INR 770 per sexed semen straw, i.e. more than double the value identified by small holder dairy farmers. Among all the predictors fitted in the interval regression model to explain the willingness to pay for sexed semen by the commercial dairy farmers, namely education level, herd size and attitude towards public extension systems, were positive and significant contributors. Our findings may help to identify what subsidy is required to promote sexed semen among dairy farmers, and as a consequence further improve breeding policies by introducing this new livestock production technology with the active participation of the dairy farmers.

Keywords

Contingent valuationdairy farmersinterval regressionsexed semenwillingness to pay
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 87 , Issue 4 , November 2020 , pp. 406 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberini, A and Kahn, JR (2006) Handbook on Contingent Valuation. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalakiya, N, Haque, N, Patel, D, Chaudhari, A, Patel, G, Madhavatar, M, Patel, P, Hossain, A and Kumar, R (2018) Sperm sexing and its application in livestock sector. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Science 7, 259–272.Google Scholar
Carney, D (1998) Changing Public and Private Roles in Agricultural Service Provision. London: Overseas Development Institute, p. 90Google Scholar
De Vries, A (2018) The Economics of Sexed Semen in Dairy Heifers and Cows. Animal Sciences Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.Google Scholar
Fetrow, J, Overton, M and Eicker, S (2007) Sexed semen: economics of a new technology. Proceedings Western Dairy Management Conference, March 7–9, Reno, NV. Available at http://www.wdmc.org/2007/fetrow.pdfGoogle Scholar
Franks, JR, Telford, DJ and Beard, AP (2003) Uptake of sexed semen by UK suckler beef producers. International Farm Management Congress 2003. Available at https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24334/files/cp03fr02.pdf.Google Scholar
Holden, S and Butler, S (2018) Applications and benefits of sexed semen in dairy and beef herds. Animal 12, S97–S103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khanal, AR (2010) Adoption of Breeding Technologies in the U.S. Dairy Industry and their influences on Farm Profitability. MSc Thesis, Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Mirajkar, PP, Singh, YP and Singh, R (2011) Analysis of willingness to pay for veterinary services of the livestock owners of Sangli district of Maharastra. Agricultural Economics Research Review 24, 149–153.Google Scholar
Layek, SS (2015) Sexed semen: an overview. Dairy Knowledge Portal, National dairy Development Board. Available at http://dairyknowledge.in/article/sexed-semen-overview.Google Scholar
Morey, E, Rossman, K, Chestnut, L and Ragland, S (1997) Valuing acid deposition injuries to cultural resources. Report to the National Acid Precipitation Assessment Programme (NAPAP), Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Norman, HD, Hutchison, JL and Miller, RH (2010) Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States. Journal of Dairy Sciences 93, 3880–3890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rath, D, Barcikowski, S, De Graf, SP, Garrels, W, Grossed, R, Klein, S, Knabe, W, Knorr, C, Kunz, W, Meyer, H, Michel, J, Moench – Tegeder, G, Rehbock, C, Taylor, U and Washausen, S (2013) Sex selection of sperm in farm animals: status report and developmental prospects. Reproduction 145, R15–R30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talokar, AJ, Behera, R, Singh, LA and Mandal, A (2017) Sexed Semen: A Boon for Indian dairy farming. Research and Reviews: Journal of Dairy Science and Technology 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
Watson, V and Ryan, M (2007) Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation. Journal of Health Economics 26, 463–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Verma et al. supplementary material

Verma et al. supplementary material

Download Verma et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 159.2 KB