Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:03:31.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of intramammary arterial infusion of non-essential amino acids and glucose in the lactating goat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

T. B. Mepham  and
J. L. Linzell
T. B. Mepham
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
J. L. Linzell
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Institute of Animal Physiology, Babraham, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three experiments were carried out on 2 lactating goats, in which mammary arterial plasma amino-acid concentrations were elevated by the infusion of a solution of non-essential amino acids into a carotid artery supplying a transplanted mammary gland. In a fourth experiment a solution of glucose was similarly infused. In some cases the increased arterial concentrations of amino acids resulted in their increased mammary uptake, and in a depression of glucose uptake. However, infusions of neither amino acids nor glucose resulted in increased milk protein yield. Infusion of [U-14C]glutamic acid in one experiment demonstrated gluconeogenesis from glutamate carbon within the mammary gland. The results are discussed in relation to data obtained in another laboratory, from which it has been claimed that non-essential amino acid supply may limit milk protein synthesis. The present results provide no confirmation for the claim.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , February 1974 , pp. 111 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R. E. (1969). In Proceedings of the University of Nottingham 3rd Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers, p. 23. (Eds Swan, H. and Lewis, D..) London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Halfpenny, A. F., Rook, J. A. F. & Smith, G. H. (1969). British Journal of Nutrition 23, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G. B. (1965). Analytical Biochemistry 12, 249.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. (1967). Journal of Physiology 190, 347.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. (1974). In Lactation, ch. 3. (Eds. Larson, B. L. and Smith, V. R..) (in the Press). New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. & Mepham, T. B. (1968). Biochemical Journal 107, 18–19P.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. & Mepham, T. B. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 101.Google Scholar
Linzell, J. L. & Peaker, M. (1971). Journal of Physiology 216, 717.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. (1967). Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. (1971). Proceedings of the 17th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham 1970, Lactation, p. 297. (Ed. Falconer, I. R..) London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. & Linzell, J. L. (1966). Biochemical Journal 101, 76.Google Scholar
Mepham, T. B. & Linzell, J. L. (1974). Journal of Dairy Research 41, 95.Google Scholar
Rook, J. A. F. (1971). In Proceedings of the 17th Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham 1970, Lactation, p. 333. (Ed. Falconer, I. R..) London: Butterworths.Google Scholar