Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T08:09:47.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distribution and density of α– and β–adrenergic receptor binding sites in the bovine mammary gland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

Harald M. Hammon
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
Rupert M. Bruckmaier
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
Ulrich E. Honegger
Affiliation:
Pharmakologisches Institut der Universität Bern, CH-3010 Bern, Schweiz
Jürg W. Blum*
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierzucht der Universität Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Schweiz
*
For correspondence.

Summary

Radioreceptor binding studies were designed to localize and determine the number of α and β-adrenergic receptors in the mammary gland of lactating cows. 3H-prazosin, 3H-rauwolscine and 3H-dihydroalprenolol were used for the regional characterization of α1, α2- and β-adrenergic receptors by competitive inhibition of binding of 3H-ligands with unlabelled adrenergic agonists and antagonists. The α1-, α2- and β2-adrenergic receptor subtypes could thus be demonstrated in the regions of the teats, large mammary ducts and parenchyma. Tissues of the teat wall, of the large mammary ducts above the gland cistern and of the mammary parenchyma were prepared to determine the density of α1, α2- and β-receptors by saturation binding assays using 3H-prazosin, 3H-rauwolscine and 3H-dihydroalprenolol respectively. Binding to high affinity sites was reversible within minutes and saturable. Equilibrium was reached within minutes. The number of α1-and α2-adrenergic receptors decreased from the teat to the mammary ducts to the parenchyma. Most of the α1- and α2-adrenergic receptors were found in the teat wall, whereas in the parenchyma α-adrenergic receptors were absent or barely detectable. The density of β-adrenergic receptors was similar in the teat wall and the large mammary ducts, but much lower in the parenchyma. Thus, α1, α2- and β-adrenergic receptors were found mainly in the milk purging system and hardly at all in mammary parenchyma. Inhibition of milk removal by α-adrenergic stimulation is possibly due to constriction of teat wall and to constriction of the mammary ducts, whereas enhanced milk flow after β-adrenergic stimulation is possibly due to relaxation not only of the teat sphincter and teat wall, but probably also of the large mammary ducts.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernabé, J. & Peeters, G. 1980 Studies on the motility of smooth muscles of the teats in lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Research 47 259275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blum, J. W., Schams, D. & Bruckmaier, R. 1989 Catecholamines, oxytocin and milk removal in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 56 167177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, R. M. & Blum, J. W. 1992 B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergie agonist and oxytocin administration. Journal of Dairy Research 59 151159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruckmaier, R., Mayer, H. & Schams, D. 1991 Effects of α- and β-adrenergic agonists on intramammary pressure and milk flow in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 58 411419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhondt, C., Houvenaghel, A., Feys-Van De Broeck, L. & Peeters, G. 1976 [Adrenergic receptors in Blood vessels in the udder of lactating cows.] Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin A 23 331337CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorewit, R. C. & Aromando, M. C. 1985 Mechanisms involved in the adrenalin-induced blockade of milk ejection in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 180 340347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, J. 1981 [The influence of a β2-mimetic substance (Planipart) on the milking behaviour of cows.] Tierärztliche Umschau 36 287290Google Scholar
Hancock, A. A., Delean, A. L. & Lefkowitz, R. J. 1979 Quantitative resolution of beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes by selective ligand binding: application of a computerized model fitting technique. Molecular Pharmacology 16 19Google ScholarPubMed
Lefcourt, A. M. & Akers, R. M. 1982 Endocrine responses of cows subjected to controlled voltages during milking. Journal of Dairy Science 65 21252130CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lefcourt, A. M. & Akers, R. M. 1984 Small increases in peripheral noradrenaline inhibit the milk-ejection response by means of a peripheral mechanism. Journal of Endocrinology 100 337344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mielke, H., Markov, A., Fürll, B., Kaskous, S. & Ponce, P. 1991 [Studies on the action of the β-receptor agonist isoprenaline on mammary gland alveoli in lactating cows with particular reference to its effect on the secretory function of epithelial cells.] Monatshefte für Veterinärmedizin 46 427430Google Scholar
Moor, M., Honegger, U. E. & Wiesmann, U. N. 1988 Organospecific, qualitative changes in the phospholipid composition of rats after chronic administration of the antidepressant drug desipramine. Biochemical Pharmacology 37 20352039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motulsky, H. J. 1987 GraphPAD (version 2.0). Philadelphia, PA: Institute of Scientific InformationGoogle Scholar
Parini, A., Homcy, C. J. & Graham, R. M. 1987 Structural properties of the α1-adrenergic receptor: studies with membrane and purified receptor preparations. Circulation Research 61 (Suppl.) I100.Google Scholar
Roets, E. & Peeters, G. 1985 Identification and characterization of 3H-Prazosin binding to α-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 275 189198Google ScholarPubMed
Roets, E. & Peeters, G. 1986 A comparison of the binding characteristics of the α2-adrenoceptor antagonists 3H-yohimbine and 3H-rauwolscine in bovine teat muscles. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 279 212222Google Scholar
Roets, E., Peeters, G. & Leysen, J. E. 1984 Identification of β-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles by 3H-dihydroalprenolol binding. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Thérapie 270 203214Google ScholarPubMed
Roets, E., Vandeputte-Van Messom, G., Burvenich, C. & Peeters, G. 1989 Relationship between numbers of α1- and β2-adrenoceptors in teat tissue and blood cells and milkability of primiparous cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72 33043313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1990 SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Gary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Schams, D., Mayer, H., Prokopp, A. & Worstorff, H. 1984 Oxytocin secretion during milking in dairy cows with regard to the variation and importance of a threshold level for milk removal. Journal of Endocrinology 102 337343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, A. G., Ahmad, S., Kwan, C. Y. & Daniel, E. E. 1989 Characterization of α-adrenoceptor subtypes by [3H] prazosin and [3H]rauwolscine binding to canine venous smooth muscle membranes. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 67 10671073CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandeputte-Van Messom, G., Burvenich, C. & Peeters, G. 1986 Involvement of β2-adrenoceptors in teat sphincter function in the lactating cow. Archives Internationales de Physiologie et de Biochimie 94 p. 34Google Scholar
Ziegler, H. & Mosimann, W. 1960 Anatomie und Physiologie der Rindermilchdrüse. Berlin: Paul PareyaGoogle Scholar