Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:39:39.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concentration of milk by ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

F. A. Glover
F. A. Glover
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Whole milk from cows was concentrated 2-fold by reverse osmosis in a small pilot scale apparatus. All the main constituents of the milk were retained in the concentrate.

The experiment showed that protein was a major cause of blocking of the membrane. Laboratory trials were therefore made on the ultrafiltration of milk to remove the protein with the aim of developing a 2-stage process for the concentration of milk by ultrafiltration followed by reverse osmosis with subsequent recombination of the concentrates from the 2 operations. The rates of both processes and the retentions of the constituents of milk by the membranes were measured.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Dairy Research , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , October 1971 , pp. 373 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blatt, E. F., Dravid, A., Michaels, A. S. & Nelson, L. (1970). In Membrane Science and Technology, p. 47. (Ed. Flinn, J. E..) New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Standards Institution (1969). B.S. 696, part 2.Google Scholar
Coton, S. G., Clark, A. J. & Fraser, S. (1970). 18th Int. Dairy Congr., Sydney 1E, 445.Google Scholar
Ford, J. E., Porter, J. W. G., Thompson, S. Y., Toothill, J. & Edwards-webb, J. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. E., Salter, D. N. & Scott, K. J. (1969). J. Dairy Res. 36, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, J. D. S. (1964). J. Dairy Res. 31, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. E. (1954). Br. J. Nutr. 8, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, B. S., Goldsmith, R. L., Hossain, S. & Zall, R. R. (1970). Milk Ind. 67, (2), 24.Google Scholar
Mcdonough, F. E. & Mattingly, W. A. (1970). Fd Technol, Champaign 24, 194.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. G., Dunkley, W. L. & Lowe, E. (1968). Fd Technol., Champaign 22, 969.Google Scholar
Nielsen, I. K., Olsen, O. J., Nielsen, W. K. & Madsen, R. F. (1970). Scandinavian Galaxy 4, 35.Google Scholar
Rowland, S. J. (1957). Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy., 1956, 74.Google Scholar
Toh hoy lim, , Dunkley, W. L. & Merson, R. L. (1971). J. Dairy Sci. 54, 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar