Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-zqvvz Total loading time: 0.295 Render date: 2021-04-11T13:57:53.419Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

723. The effect of level of concentrate feeding and type of roughage on milk production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

M. E. Castle
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
D. S. Maclusky
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
R. Waite
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr
J. N. Watson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Dairy Research Institute, Kirkhill, Ayr

Extract

1. In a short-term winter feeding trial using eight Ayrshire cows, a concentrate with a nominal starch equivalent of 68 was fed at 2 lb. and 4 lb./gal. of milk with either 16 lb. hay or 16 lb. dried grass. Silage (40 lb. per day) was also fed.

2. The weight of dry matter from grass products eaten per day was similar on all four treatments. Differences in total daily dry-matter consumption were very largely attributable to differences in the consumption of concentrate dry matter.

3. The daily dry-matter consumption as a percentage of live weight increased from 2·5 on the rations that included hay and 2 lb. concentrates per gal. to 3·2 on the rations that included dried grass and 4 lb. concentrates per gal.

4. Milk yield was significantly increased from an average of 33·5 to 37·3 lb./day when the amount of concentrates fed increased from 2 to 4 lb./gal. and also significantly increased from 33·9 to 36·9 lb./day when dried grass was fed in place of hay.

5. There was an increase of 0·9 lb. milk for each 1 lb. increase of starch equivalent plus 0·2 lb. digestible crude protein intake as a result of either increasing the rate of concentrate feeding, or of feeding dried grass instead of hay.

6. The fat content of the milk was similar on all four rations, whereas the solids-not-fat varied from 8·42% on the ration that included hay +2 lb. concentrates/gal, to 8·59% on the ration that included dried grass +4 1b. concentrates/gal. This change in S.N.F. was almost entirely in the protein fraction of the milk.

7. There was a gradation in live-weight change from -0·74 lb./day on the hay +2 lb. concentrates/gal, to +0·34 lb./day on the dried grass +4 lb. concentrates/gal.

8. After a consideration of profit margins, milk quality and live-weight changes it was concluded that both treatments B (dried grass +2 lb./gal.) and C (hay +4 lb./gal.) gave optimum and almost identical results.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

(1)Hamilton, R. A. (1952). J. Fmrs' Cl., Lond., Part 4, 3.Google Scholar
(2)Hamilton, R. A. (1955). Agriculture, Lond., 62, 374, 407.Google Scholar
(3)Castle, M. E. (1953). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 8, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Holmes, W. (1954). J. Brit. grassl. Soc. 9, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Reid, D. & Holmes, W. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 159,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Williams, E. J. (1949). Aust. J. sci. Res. 2(A), 149.Google Scholar
(7)Woodman, H. E. (1954). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., No. 48.Google Scholar
(8)Lucas, H. L. (1943). J. Dairy Sci. 26, 1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Waite, R., White, J. C. D. & Robertson, Alan (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Blackburn, P. S., Laing, Constance & Malcolm, J. F. (1955). J. Dairy Res. 22, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Holmes, W., Reid, D., MacLusky, D. S., Waite, R. & Watson, J. N. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Holmes, W., Waite, R., MacLusky, D. S. & Watson, J. N. (1956). J. Dairy Res. 23, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Burt, A. W. A. (1957). Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19 (6), 436.Google Scholar
(14)Griffiths, T. W. & Featherstone, J. (1957). J. Dairy Res. 24, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(15)Moon, F. E. (1954). J. agric. Sci. 44, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)McDonald, P. & Purves, D. (1956). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 7, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 11th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

723. The effect of level of concentrate feeding and type of roughage on milk production
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

723. The effect of level of concentrate feeding and type of roughage on milk production
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

723. The effect of level of concentrate feeding and type of roughage on milk production
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *