Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:04:38.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

335. Mists containing hypochlorite as germicides in the destruction of air-borne bacteriophages attacking lactic streptococci

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2009

J. Z. Wolf
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Agnes A. Nichols
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
P. June Ineson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading

Extract

1. The germicidal effect of spraying hypochlorite solutions of varying strength on three different phage races of streptococci from cheese starter has been described. It has been shown that fine mists containing 0·003–0·02 p.p.m. av./cl., usually ensure satisfactory destruction of air-borne phage.

2. Below a relative humidity of about 50% hypochlorite solutions cause a slight or negligible destruction of bacteriophage particles.

3. A gelatine medium has been found useful for collecting phage particles from the air, since it could be liquefied without danger of destruction of the phage after exposure and a quantitative estimation obtained of the phage particles collected.

4. When the relative humidity was low the recovery of phage particles from the air was increased.

5. Some experiments using mists of resorcinol and propylene glycol are also reported.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Proprietors of Journal of Dairy Research 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Hunter, G. J. E. & Whitehead, H. R. (1940). J. Dairy Res. 11, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Meanwell, L. J. Private communication.Google Scholar
(3)Mattick, A. T. R., Nichols, A. A. & Wolf, J. Z. (1944). Nat. Inst. Res. Dairying Publ. no. 794.Google Scholar
(4)Whitehead, H. R. & Hunter, G. J. E. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Nichols, A. A. & Wolf, J. Z. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 81.Google Scholar
(6)Nichols, A. A. & Wolf, J. Z. (1944). J. Dairy Res. 13, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Niohols, A. A. & Wolf, J. Z. (1945). J. Dairy Res. 14, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Masterman, A. T. (1941). J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Bourdillon, R. B., Lidwell, O. M. & Thomas, J. C. (1941). J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Challinor, S. W. (1943). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Elford, W. J. & Van Den Ende, J. (1945). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Whitehead, H. R. & Hunter, G. J. E. (1941). J. Dairy Res. 12, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Phelps, E. B. (1940). Yearb. Amer. publ. Hlth Ass. 1939–40, p. 102.Google Scholar
(14)Twort, C. C., Baker, A. H., Finn, S. R. & Powell, E. O. (1940). J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 253.Google Scholar
(15)Robertson, O. H., Bigg, E., Puck, T. T. & Miller, B. F. (1942). J. exp. Med. 75, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Challinor, S. W. & Duguid, J. P. (1944). Edinb. med. J. 51, 280.Google Scholar
(17)Douglas, S. R., Hill, L. & Smith, W. (1928). J. industr. Hyg. 10, 219.Google Scholar
(18)Masterman, A. T. (1938). J. industr. Hyg. 20, 278.Google Scholar
(19)Baker, A. H., Finn, S. R. & Twort, C. C. (1940). J. Hyg., Camb., 40, 560.Google Scholar
(20)Pulvertaft, R. J. U. (1944). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 352.Google Scholar
(21)Edwards, D. G. ff. & Lidwell, O. M. (1943). J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Henle, W. & Zellat, J. (1941). Proc. Soc. exp. Bid., N.Y., 48, 544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(23)Stokes, J. & Henle, W. (1942). J. Amer. med. Ass. 120, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Baker, A. H. & Twort, C. C. (1941). J. Hyg., Camb., 41, 117.Google Scholar