1.Lorell, BH, et al.Informed consent in clinical research: Consensus recommendations for reform identified by an expert interview panel. Clinical Trials (London, England) 2015; 12(6): 692–695.
2.Shenoy, P. Electronic informed consenting: A boon to modernize consenting process. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2015; 6(4): 173–174.10.4103/2229-3485.167091
3.Rothwell, E, et al.A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JERHRE) 2014; 9(5): 1–7.10.1177/1556264614552627
5.Flory, J, Emanuel, E.Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004; 292(13): 1593–1601.10.1001/jama.292.13.1593
6.Tait, AR, et al.Patient comprehension of an interactive, computer-based information program for cardiac catheterization: A comparison with standard information. Archives of Internal Medicine 2009; 169(20): 1907–1914.10.1001/archinternmed.2009.390
7.Warriner, AH, et al.A pragmatic randomized trial comparing tablet computer informed consent to traditional paper-based methods for an osteoporosis study. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2016; 3: 32–38.10.1016/j.conctc.2016.02.003
8.Frelich, M, Bosler, M, Gould, JC. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) electronic Informed Consent Form (eICF) is compliant and feasible in a clinical research setting. International Journal of Clinical Trials 2015; 2(3): 51–55.
11.Harris, PA, et al.Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2009; 42(2): 377–381.
13.Zerhouni, EATranslational and clinical science – time for a new vision. The New England Journal of Medicine 2005; 353(15): 1621–1623.10.1056/NEJMsb053723
14.Bernard, GR, et al.A collaborative, academic approach to optimizing the national clinical research infrastructure: The first year of the Trial Innovation Network. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2018; 2(4): 187–192.
17.Hallinan, ZP, et al.Barriers to change in the informed consent process: A systematic literature review. IRB 2016; 38(3): 1–10.
18.Ford, JG, et al.Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review. Cancer 2008; 112(2): 228–242.10.1002/cncr.23157
19.Baker, DW.PERSPECTIVE: The meaning and the measure of health literacy. Journal of General Internal Medicine N Y. 2006; 21(8): 878–883.
22.An Innovative Simulation-based Community-engaged Intervention for Training Research Assistants in Culturally Appropriate Informed Consent. – PubMed - NCBI [Internet] [cited 2019 Sep 6]. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30581168)
23.George, S, Duran, N, Norris, K.A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health 2013; 104(2): e16–e31.
24.Powell, LR, et al.Psychometric development of the research and knowledge scale. Medical Care 2017; 55(2): 117–124.
25.Andrulis, DP, Brach, C.Integrating literacy, culture, and language to improve health care quality for diverse populations. American Journal of Health Behavior 2007; 31(Suppl 1): S122–S13310.5993/AJHB.31.s1.16
26.Development work for REDCap External Modules/Packages to support a standardized Hook/Plugin framework and management mechanism: vanderbilt/redcap-external-modules [Internet]. Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, 2019 [cited 2019 Jan 11]. (https://github.com/vanderbilt/redcap-external-modules)
27.Joosten, YA, et al.Community engagement studios: A structured approach to obtaining meaningful input from stakeholders to inform research. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical 2015; 90(12): 1646–1650.
30.McConnochie, KMWebside manner: A key to high-quality primary care telemedicine for all. Telemedicine and e-Health Off American Telemedicine Association 2019; 25(11), 1007–1011
32.Schallhorn, SC, et al.Informed consent in refractive surgery: In-person vs telemedicine approach. Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 2018; 12: 2459–2470.10.2147/OPTH.S183249
33.Haussen, DC, et al.Utilization of a smartphone platform for electronic informed consent in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2017; 48(11): 3156–3160.10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018380
34.Phillippi, JC, et al.Electronic informed consent to facilitate recruitment of pregnant women into research. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2018; 47(4): 529–534.10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.134
35.Koyfman, SA, et al.Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison. Cancer 2016; 122(3): 464–469.
37.Harris, PA, et al.REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. 2019; 95: 103208.