Headlee, C. We Need to Talk: How to Have Conversations That Matter. New York, NY: Harper Wave, 2017.
Kind, T, Patel, PD, Lie, D, et al. Twelve tips for using social media as a medical educator. Medical Teacher 2014; 36(4): 284–290. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.852167.
Anderson, M, Perrin, A, Jiang, J. 11% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they? Pew Research Center, March 5, 2018. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/2oJDZst. Accessed September 3, 2019. 8.
McKee, P. (2017). The driven to discover research facility. Retrieved from http://d2d.umn.edu/. Accessed September 3, 2019.
Bartlett, JE, Kotrlik, JW, Higgins, CC. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 2001; 19(1): 43–50.
Morris, NS, et al. (2006). The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Family Practice 7, 21. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-21.
Fan, JX, Wen, M, Kowaleski-Jones, L. Rural–urban differences in objective and subjective measures of physical activity: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006. Preventing Chronic Disease 2014; 11: E141.
Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 2013.
Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46.
Ahmed, S, et al. Science cafes: engaging scientists and community through health and science dialogue. Clinical and Translational Science 2014; 7(3): 196–200.
Balls-Berry, JE, et al. Using garden cafés to engage community stakeholders in health research. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(8): e0200483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200483.
Joosten, YA, et al. Community engagement studios: a structured approach to obtaining meaningful input from stakeholders to inform research. Academic Medicine 2015; 90(12): 1646–1650.
Cottler, LB, et al. Community needs, concerns, and perceptions about health research: findings from the clinical and translational science award sentinel network. American Journal of Public Health 2013; 103(9): 1685–1692.
Westfall, JM, et al. Reinventing the wheel of medical evidence: how the boot camp translation process is making gains. Health Affairs (Millwood) 2016; 35(4): 613–618.
Balls-Berry, J, et al. Linking podcasts with social media to promote community health and medical research: feasibility study. JMIR Formative Research 2018; 2(2): e10025. doi: 10.2196/10025.
Valdez Soto, M, et al. Use of Web 2.0 social media platforms to promote community-engaged research dialogs: a preliminary program evaluation. JMIR Research Protocols 2016: 5(3): e183. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4808.
Davis, MM, et al. Engaging the underserved: a process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research. Clinical and Translational Science 2014; 7(4): 300–306. doi: 10.1111/cts.12168. Epub 2014 May 19.
Griffith, DM, Shelton, RC, Kegler, M. Advancing the science of qualitative research to promote health equity. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 2017; 44(5): 673–676. doi: 10.1177/1090198117728549.
Martinez, LS, et al. Clinical and translational research and community engagement: implications for researcher capacity building. Clinical and Translational Science 2012; 5(4): 329–332.
Sharma, AE, Grumbach, K. Engaging patients in primary care practice transformation: theory, evidence and practice. Family Practice 2017; 34(3): 262–267. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw128.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC/ATSDR Committee on Community Engagement. Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011. Accessed at: http://www.cdc.gov/phppo/pce/index.htm.