The authors wish to thank Joshua Biber, Scott Maresh Nelson, and Luke Rasmussen for critical comments on the manuscript draft. In addition, the authors wish to thank Zachary L. Wang, who helped patients understand use of the patient portal and encouraged enrollment in Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Services at the University of Chicago.
This research was supported, in part, by the EHR Access to Seamless Integration of PROMIS (EASI-PRO) grant: U01TR001806, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)/National Institutes of Health (NIH). (Individual authors funded: BA, JB, ADB, SVB, YG, BAH, KH, KMK, DL, KM, FM, JM, TAN, NER, NDS, JBS, ALV, DW, SHW.)
This research was also supported by local Clinical and Translational Science Awards through the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences:
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
At the University of Florida, this research was also supported, in part, by internal funding from the Cancer Informatics and eHealth Core as part of the University of Florida Health Cancer Center (JB, YG, KM, FM, DW, SHW).
1.Greenhalgh, J, et al.Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library, 2017.
3.Hsiao, C, et al.Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology. Quality of Life Research 2019; 28(6): 1575.
5.Biber, J, et al.Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2018; 2: 34.
6.Lorenzi, NM, Riley, RT.Managing Technological Change: Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.
7.Damschroder, LJ, et al.Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 2009; 4: 50.
9.Fox, WM.Sociotechnical system principles and guidelines: past and present. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1995; 31(1): 91–105.
10.Wesley, DB, et al. A socio-technical systems approach to the use of health IT for patient reported outcomes: patient and healthcare provider perspectives. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2019; 4: 100, 048.
11.Yusof, MM, et al.An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008; 77(6): 386–398.
12.Erlirianto, LM, et al.The implementation of the human, organization, and technology – fit (HOT-fit) framework to evaluate the electronic medical record (EMR) system in a hospital. Procedia Computer Science 2015; 72: 580–587.
17.Chan, EKH, et al.Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user’s guide. Quality of Life Research 2019; 28(6): 21.
18.Franklin, PD, et al. Framework to guide the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures in the learning healthcare system. eGems 2017; 5(1): 17.
19.Antunes, B, Harding, R, Higginson, IJ.Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliative Medicine 2014; 28: 158–175.
21.Snyder, C, et al.Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research 2012; 21(8): 1305–1314.
22.Austin, E, et al. W01: How Health Systems Should Be Thinking About Clinical Integration of Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (sponsored by Consumer and Pervasive Health Informatics Working Group), American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Instructional Workshop materials, 2018.
23.Zhang, R, et al.Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open, 2019; 2(1): 73–80.
24.Anatchkova, M, et al. Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes 2018; 2:64.
25.Warsame, R, Halyard, MY.Patient-reported outcome measurement in clinical practice: overcoming challenges to continue progress. Journal of Clinical Pathways 2017; 3(1): 43–46.
26.Velikova, G, et al.Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2004; 22(4): 714–724.
27.Holmes, MM, et al.The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research 2017; 26: 245.
28.Basch, E, et al.Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012; 30: 4249–4255.
29.Gerhardt, WE, et al.Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children’s Hospital. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 2018; 44(8): 441–453.