Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Information:

  • Access
  • Open access
  • Cited by 3

Actions:

      • Send article to Kindle

        To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

        Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

        Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

        Parenting stress and DNA methylation among African Americans in the InterGEN Study
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Dropbox

        To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

        Parenting stress and DNA methylation among African Americans in the InterGEN Study
        Available formats
        ×

        Send article to Google Drive

        To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

        Parenting stress and DNA methylation among African Americans in the InterGEN Study
        Available formats
        ×
Export citation

Abstract

Introduction

General life stress has been associated with altered DNA methylation in individuals of African Ancestry, although the relationship between parenting stress and DNA methylation has not been described. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between maternal parenting stress and DNA methylation among African Ancestry mother-child dyads.

Methods

We evaluated epigenome-wide DNA methylation relative to parenting stress in 74 mother-child dyads using linear mixed models.

Results

Significant variation in maternal DNA methylation at 95 CpG sites was associated with level of parenting stress. Notably, we identified a change in DNA methylation associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1, which plays a key role in stress signaling. We did not identify any significant variation in child DNA methylation related to maternal parenting stress.

Conclusions

However, DNA methylation patterns observed in children mirrored patterns observed in their mothers. The results suggest that differential maternal DNA methylation is associated with higher levels of parenting stress.

Introduction

The experiences of parenting can cause stress related to work, life events, environment, marital relationships, daily hassles, and child rearing responsibilities [1]. For this study, we define parenting stress as the stress that parents feel in their parenting role. Mothers of African Ancestry (AA) have higher levels of parenting stress than mothers of European Ancestry in the United States [2, 3], which may contribute to adverse health outcomes in mothers and their children. Parenting stress among AA populations has been correlated with risk factors associated with health disparities observed in those of AA, such as hypertension. Parenting stress may contribute to overall maternal stress levels, influencing health outcomes of the mother and child similar to other types of psychological stress. In a previous study, we observed higher diastolic blood pressure in AA caregivers that report higher levels of parenting stress [4]. A study by Hughes et al. reported that AA families experiencing higher levels of parenting stress are more likely to engage in uninvolved feeding styles with their children, which are associated with obesity in children [5]. Although research evaluating the relationship of parenting stress to physiological outcomes in AA mothers and their children is limited, we hypothesized that parenting stress could be associated with epigenetic differences in stress response pathways, similar to those observed in other forms of psychological stress, and contribute to heath disparities observed in AA mothers and their children.

Epigenetic modifications to the genome do not alter the nucleotide sequence in DNA but are capable of altering gene expression and contributing to the pathogenesis of complex disease states [6]. Differences in DNA methylation, an epigenetic mark observed as a methyl group affixed to a cytosine residue in a cytosine-guanine dinucleotide, have been found in genes involved in stress response and inflammatory pathways in AA adults who experienced low socioeconomic status in childhood [7]. Stress related to finances has also been associated with increased DNA methylation at sites associated with accelerated epigenetic aging in AA women [8]. One recent study evaluated DNA methylation in adults relative to their perception of parenting and maternal stress during 3 developmental periods from their upbringing [9]. The authors did not find any significant correlation between maternal stress and DNA methylation in adult children, although they did identify statistically significant associations between offspring’s perception of parenting from middle childhood to adulthood and the DNA methylation in offspring’s adult genomes. The authors also reported stronger associations with indicators of the child’s perceived parenting than with maternal reports of maternal parenting stress, suggesting that changes in perceived parental rejection have a stronger association with the offspring’s adult epigenome than measures of maternal parenting stress.

There has been extensive research investigating DNA methylation in children exposed to maternal stress in utero [10], although there is a gap in the literature evaluating the relationships among parenting stress and the epigenome of the mother or child. Schechter et al. evaluated DNA methylation at the nuclear receptor subfamily 3 group C member 1 (NR3C1) gene, a gene that encodes glucocorticoid receptor, related to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and parenting stress in mothers of young children (12–42 months old) [11]. The authors suggest PTSD and parenting stress were negatively correlated with NR3C1 methylation, which could be associated with altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responsiveness. However, the authors noted that the study was not sufficiently powered to differentiate if the loss of DNA methylation at NR3C1 was associated with PTSD or higher levels of parenting stress independent of each other. Combined, the studies completed by Schechter and Naumova’s research groups suggest there may be differential DNA methylation in mothers and children associated specifically with parenting stress of the mother. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship among maternal parenting stress and epigenome-wide DNA methylation in AA mothers and their children.

Materials and Methods

Data for this study were collected from our ongoing study: The Intergenerational Impact of Genetic and Psychological Factors on Blood Pressure (InterGEN) [12, 13]. This sample contains 74 mother-child dyads (n=148) involved in our current prospective study examining the intergenerational impact of genetic and psychological factors on blood pressure. Extensive details on recruitment and statistical methods have been described elsewhere [12, 13]. In brief, after approval from the institutional review board was obtained, mothers were recruited from the community who had a child between the ages of 3 through 5 years of age and would be followed for 2 years to evaluate factors that may contribute to variations in blood pressure in mothers and children. Baseline demographic data and the Parenting Stress Index—Short Form (PSI-SF) [14] was obtained via audio self-assisted interviewing software. Saliva samples for analyses with the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC (850 K) BeadChip [15] were collected from the mother and child at the time of the interview. After 2 years of data collection, 81 mother-child dyads have completed baseline interviews and provided saliva for DNAm analysis. Six mothers did not complete the PSI during the interview and 1 child could not provide saliva at the time of the interview for DNAm analysis; these dyads were excluded from these analyses (n=148 complete cases). Four mothers had 1 missing value from a PSI subscale. The mean for the subscale of the missed item for each individual was imputed and used for analyses per PSI protocol manual [14]. Quality control and preprocessing analytic pipeline of 850 K DNAm has been described elsewhere [12]. All individual samples passed the quality control procedures. In the epigenome-wide association study (EWAS), a total of 847,155 autosomal CpG sites were included. After merging with phenotypic data, 74 African American mothers and 74 children were retained so that only complete cases were analyzed. Epigenome-wide association analyses were conducted among mothers and children separately. Among children, the effects of maternal stress on children’s DNA methylation were examined. Linear regression models were applied with DNAm β-values as dependent variables, and total PSI-SF score as independent variables. Age and maternal smoking status were adjusted for potential confounding effects. Sex was also adjusted in the analyses among children. A reference-free EWAS method was used to account for potential heterogeneity in cell proportions from saliva samples [16]. Genomic control approach [17] adjustment was applied to address potential unmeasured confounding and inflation of type I error. Genomic control is a statistical method to measure the global deviation of a distribution of test statistics from a null distribution [17]. This method is not limited to a specific type of trait or study design, and does not require a case-control design. The method of genomic control has been widely applied to genome-wide association studies and EWAS of both quantitative and qualitative traits to measure and correct for the global inflation of low p-values to reduce false positive finding [18, 19]. False discovery rate was applied to account for multiple testing of epigenome-wide CpG sites. All analyses were conducted in the R statistical computing environment [20] and a selection of packages from Bioconductor.

Results

The sample population is comprised of self-identified African American/Black women and one of their biological children who are between the ages of 3 through 5 years old. Demographic data are listed in Table 1 and in online Supplementary Table S1. The mean age of our maternal participants was 32.4 years old and 24% indicated that they currently smoke cigarettes. The mean age of our children was 3.7 years old, and 35% of children were male.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of study sample (n=74 dyads)

Parenting Stress Index items were scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with larger scores corresponding to increased parenting stress.

Significant variation in maternal DNA methylation at 95 CpG sites were associated with levels of parenting stress after genomic control (false discovery rate adjusted p<0.05) (Fig. 1). Notably, the relationship between parenting stress and DNA methylation was inversely proportional at most sites (83 out of 95 sites, 87%) and had decreased DNA methylation with higher levels of parenting stress (online Supplementary Table S2). We did not identify any epigenome-wide significant differences in DNA methylation in children related to the level of maternal parenting stress after genomic control. We compared the top 20 epigenetic associations with maternal parenting stress levels among children with the 95 significant CpG sites discovered among mothers. Summarized in Table 2, 4 CpG sites were found to meet epigenome-wide significant among mothers and were also marginally significant among children (p<5×10−7). We identified a change in DNA methylation associated with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), which plays a key role in stress signaling. One of the CpG sites maps to 2 genes, kelch like family member 35 (KLHL35) and glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase domain containing 5 (GDPD5). KLHL35, is involved in the ubiquitination processes, although its specific role in the process has not yet been characterized. GDPD5, contributes to glycerol metabolism and plays a role in neurogenesis and differentiation of neurons. The 2 remaining sites, cg14574088 and cg15575851, map to uncharacterized sites on the human genome. In addition, the observed DNA methylation patterns in the children are consistent with DNAm patterns observed in their mothers (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1 (a) QQ plot—epigenome-wide association analysis with total parenting stress index score among 74 African Ancestry (AA) mothers [genomic control (GC) approach was applied on raw p-values]. (b) Manhattan plot—epigenome-wide association analysis with total parenting stress index score among 74 AA mothers (GC approach was applied on raw p-values; red line: false discovery rate adjusted p-value=0.05).

Fig. 2 Regional plots of common significant epigenetic associations with maternal parenting stress in African Ancestry mothers and children (red circles: epigenetic associations in mother; blue circles: epigenetic associations in children). (a) through (d) correspond to the CpG sites listed in Table 2; CpGs sites are listed at the top of each figure within the box annotating the location.

Table 2 Epigenome-wide associations with parenting stress identified among African Ancestry mothers and replicated among children

bp, base pair; GC, genomic control; FDR, false discovery rate.

* FDR adjustment applied after GC approach.

Discussion

Our study results suggest that levels of parenting stress are associated with differential DNA methylation in mothers, but not significantly in their young children. Of particular importance, we observed that higher levels of parenting stress was associated with hypomethylation in CpG sites located in the 3-UTR and gene body of PARP-1 (Fig. 2a ). In this study, we conducted an EWAS of parenting stress, in which we interrogated individual CpG sites to identify significant epigenetic associations based on test for single CpG site, rather than test for multiple associated CpG sites within a local genomic region (ie, differential methylation regions). We presented regional plots of 4 regions harboring significant epigenetic associations in both mothers and children. Only the PARP-1 region has additional epigenetic associations, not the other 3 regions. Multiple associations from the same region may increase the confidence of true epigenetic associations. However, single associated CpG site within a region does not indicate a false positive given the stringent significant threshold and replication between mothers and children. The density of the EPIC array, ~3.7 kb mean interval between CpG sites does not guarantee the coverage of co-methylated sites. In our experience, significant and replicated epigenetic associations can be either clustered or stand-alone. In the case of cigarette smoking, one of the most established epigenetic modifiers, AHRR region has multiple strongly smoking-associated CpG sites, and F2RL3 contains a single smoking-associated CpG site using 450 K chip [21]. To further explore the regional associations, we plotted all regions harboring significant association with parenting stress among mothers (online Supplementary Figure). Fifty out of 95 regions contain more than one suggestive associations (p<0.001).

Altered DNA methylation associated with PARP-1 warrants further follow up in human population as the gene is known to play a key role in cellular function and response to stress. Alterations in the PARP-1 gene have been associated with genome instability, shorter lifespans, and spontaneous tumors in animal models [22]. Gene activity is often induced by DNA strand breaks and other conditions that signal the cell may come under stress, such as inflammation or changes in metabolic conditions. Up-regulation of PARP-1 can result in death of the cells by decreasing the amount of ATP and β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) available to carry out cellular processes [23]. Furthermore, PARP-1 functions in the regulation of DNA methylation modifications and is necessary for reprogramming somatic cells [24]. PARP-1 is widely expressed when DNA damage or other threats to the cell are present and deficiencies in PARP-1 have been associated with increased levels of DNA methylation [24]. Since high levels of PARP-1 are associated with cell death, and extreme deficiencies of PARP-1 leads to reduced transcription of genes that help repair DNA damage in response to cellular threats, the production of PARP-1 must be maintained in a specific range for optimal functioning. Alteration in DNA methylation at the promoter site of PARP-1 has resulted in altered gene expression in laboratory settings [25, 26]. Further studies are needed to determine if differences in DNA methylation at PARP-1 are associated with altered protein production or other measureable health effects in clinical populations. Since altered expression levels of PARP-1 are associated modification of DNA methylation and gene expression at other sites in the genome, differential methylation at this site in clinical populations may be precursor to other alterations that could have a lasting impact on future health outcomes.

Although the specific role of KLHL35 has not yet been identified in humans, others have observed differential methylation at CpG sites of the gene. Methylation at a cluster of CpGs near the second exon of KLHL35 was decreased in children that were born of older mothers [27]. The researchers also determined that the differential methylation persisted into adulthood and was replicable in another smaller sample. Since the role of KLHL35 is not yet known, the biological significance of the observed changes in DNA methylation are unclear. Similar to Markunas’ [27] results on maternal age at delivery, we identified a decrease in DNA methylation of KLHL35 with increased parenting stress. Conversely, hypermethylation of the KLHL35 sites has been associated with liver and renal cancers [28, 29]. It is unclear what health implications for hypomethylation associated with KLHL35 entail in our population or Markunas’ study. Although downstream protein production was not evaluated in our nor Markunas’ study, the observed DNA methylation mark may serve as a biomarker for parenting stress.

We chose to use saliva sampling in this study due to the ease of access and reduction of invasive procedures while working with young children. Our protocol produced high quality samples that passed QC protocols for the new EPIC array technology. One drawback to the use of saliva for DNA methylation analysis is the heterogeneity of DNA sources in saliva samples (eg, epithelial cells, leukocytes, and even foreign bacteria). However, a recent study comparing saliva and blood samples using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip, found that DNA methylation levels in saliva may be more similar to brain tissue than blood, and the authors advocate for further exploration of the utility of saliva samples in psychiatric genetics [30]. Furthermore, our study detected differences in DNA methylation within the stress response pathway using saliva, a biofluid historically used to measure stress hormones such as cortisol. Future studies may choose to use saliva samples to concurrently measure DNA methylation and other biomarkers of stress with minimally invasive sample collection.

Because the study did not collect multiple samples for DNA methylation over time, it is unclear if the DNA methylation differences observed were a direct result of parenting stress or were preexisting differences that contribute to the mother’s response or perceived level of parenting stress. We also did not collect protein samples and are unable to evaluate if the differences in DNA methylation observed related to parenting stress are associated with differences in expression of PARP-1 or KLHL35. Since transcribed levels PARP-1 that are too high and too low have been associated with negative outcomes in laboratory models, it will be important to evaluate implications in clinical settings related to health outcomes. Further research on the function of KLHL35 is necessary to determine if alterations contribute to changes in health or merely mark differences between groups.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research R01NR013520.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplementary materials

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.3

References

1. Abidin, RR. The determinants of parenting behavior. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1992; 21: 407412.
2. Nam, Y, Wikoff, N, Sherraden, M. Racial and ethnic differences in parenting stress: evidence from a statewide sample of new mothers. Journal of Child and Family Studies 2015; 24: 278288.
3. Cardoso, JB, Padilla, YC, Sampson, M. Racial and ethnic variation in the predictors of maternal parenting stress. Journal of Social Service Research 2010; 36: 429444.
4. Taylor, JY, et al. Parental stress among African American parents and grandparents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 2007; 28: 373387.
5. Hughes, SO, et al. Parent emotional distress and feeding styles in low-income families. The role of parent depression and parenting stress. Appetite 2015; 92: 337342.
6. Clark, AE, Adamian, M, Taylor, JY. An overview of epigenetics in nursing. The Nursing Clinics of North America 2013; 48: 649659.
7. Needham, BL, et al. Life course socioeconomic status and DNA methylation in genes related to stress reactivity and inflammation: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Epigenetics 2015; 10: 958969.
8. Simons, RL, et al. Economic hardship and biological weathering: the epigenetics of aging in a U.S. sample of black women. Social Science & Medicine 2016; 150: 192200.
9. Naumova, OY, et al. Epigenetic patterns modulate the connection between developmental dynamics of parenting and offspring psychosocial adjustment. Child Development 2016; 87: 98110.
10. Monk, C, Spicer, J, Champagne, FA. Linking prenatal maternal adversity to developmental outcomes in infants: the role of epigenetic pathways. Development and Psychopathology 2012; 24: 13611376.
11. Schechter, DS, et al. Methylation of NR3C1 is related to maternal PTSD, parenting stress and maternal medial prefrontal cortical activity in response to child separation among mothers with histories of violence exposure. Frontiers in Psychology 2015; 6: 690.
12. Crusto, CA, et al. The Intergenerational Impact of Genetic and Psychological Factors on Blood Pressure Study (InterGEN). Nursing Research 2016; 65: 331338.
13. Taylor, JY, et al. The Intergenerational Impact of Genetic and Psychological Factors on Blood Pressure (InterGEN) Study: design and methods for complex DNA analysis. Biological Research for Nursing 2016; 8: 521530.
14. Abidin, RR. Parenting Stress Index. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1995.
15. Pidsley, R, et al. Critical evaluation of the Illumina Methylation EPIC BeadChip microarray for whole-genome DNA methylation profiling. Genome Biology 2016; 208: 17.
16. Houseman, EA, Molitor, J, Marsit, CJ. Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2014; 30: 14311439.
17. Devlin, B, Roeder, K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 1999; 55: 9971004.
18. Pearson, TA, Manolio, TA. How to interpret a genome-wide association study. Journal of American Medical Association 2008; 299:13351344.
19. Shenker, NS, et al. Epigenome-wide association study in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Turin) identifies novel genetic loci associated with smoking. Human Molecular Genetics 2013; 22: 843851.
20. R. Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2008.
21. Sun, YV, et al. Epigenomic association analysis identifies smoking-related DNA methylation sites in African Americans. Human Genetics 2013; 132: 10271037.
22. Luo, X, Kraus, WL. On PAR with PARP: cellular stress signaling through poly(ADP-ribose) and PARP-1. Genes & Development 2012; 26: 417432.
23. Ha, HC, Hester, LD, Snyder, SH. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 dependence of stress-induced transcription factors and associated gene expression in glia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002; 99: 32703275.
24. Doege, CA, et al. Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature 2012; 488: 652655.
25. Gao, A, et al. Methylation of PARP-1 promoter involved in the regulation of benzene-induced decrease of PARP-1 mRNA expression. Toxicology Letters 2010; 195: 114118.
26. Gong, C, et al. Methylation of PARP-1 promoter involved in the regulation of nano-SiO2-induced decrease of PARP-1 mRNA expression. Toxicology Letters 2012; 209: 264269.
27. Markunas, CA, et al. Maternal age at delivery is associated with an epigenetic signature in both newborns and adults. PLOS One 2016; 11: e0156361.
28. Morris, MR, et al. Genome-wide methylation analysis identifies epigenetically inactivated candidate tumour suppressor genes in renal cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2011; 30: 13901401.
29. Shitani, M, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation identifies novel cancer-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biology 2012; 33: 13071317.
30. Smith, AK, et al. DNA extracted from saliva for methylation studies of psychiatric traits: evidence tissue specificity and relatedness to brain. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics 2015; 168B: 3644.