1.Selby, JV, Beal, AC, Frank, L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012; 307(15): 1583–1584.
2.Patient-centered outcomes research institute. About Us: Research done differently. Retrieved from https://www.pcori.org/about-us. Accessed June 26, 2017.
3.Cargo, M, Mercer, SL. The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health 2008; 29(1): 325–350.
4.Strand, KJ, Cutworth, N, Stoecker, R, et al. Community-based Research and Higher Education: Principles and Practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2003.
5.Wallerstein, N, Duran, B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promotion and Practice 2006; 7(3): 312–323.
6.Butterfoss, FD. Coalitions and Partnerships in Community Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
7.Martinez, LS, Russell, B, Rubin, CL, et al. Clinical and translational research and community engagement: Implications for researcher capacity building. Clinical and Translational Science 2012; 5(4): 329–332.
8.Uyeda, K, Bogart, LM, Hawes-Dawson, J, et al. Development and implementation of a school-based obesity prevention intervention: Lessons learned from community-based participatory research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 2009; 3(3): 249–255.
9.Cole, CA, Edelman, EJ, Boshnack, N, et al. Time, dual roles, and departments of public health: Lessons learned in CBPR by an AIDS service organization. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 2013; 7(3): 323–330.
10.Lucero, J, Wallerstein, N. Trust in community, academic research partnerships: Increasing the consciousness of conflict and trust development. In: Sage Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. John G. Oetzel and Stella Ting-Toomey, 537–562 (Ch. 20), 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013.
11.Freeman, E, Seifer, SD, Stupak, M, et al. Community engagement in the CTSA program: Stakeholder responses from a national Delphi process. Clinical and Translational Science 2014; 7(3), 191–195.
12.Crisp, J, Pelletier, D, Duffield, C, et al. The Delphi method? Nursing Research 1997; 46(2), 116–118.
13.Forsythe, LP, Ellis, LE, Edmundson, L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: Description and lessons learned. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2016; 31(1): 13–21.
14.Selby, JV, Forsythe, L, Sox, HC. Stakeholder-driven comparative effectiveness research: An update from PCORI. JAMA 2015; 314(21): 2235–2236.
15.Carman, KL, Workman, TA. Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: Applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Education and Counseling 2017; 100(1): 25–29.
16.Woolf, SH, Zimmerman, E, Haley, A, et al. Authentic engagement of patients and communities can transform research, practice, and policy. Health Affairs 2016; 35(4): 590–594.
17.Concannon, TW, Fuster, M, Saunders, T, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2014; 29(12): 1692–1701.
18.Goodman, MS, Thompson, VLS. The science of stakeholder engagement in research: Classification, implementation, and evaluation. Translational Behavioral Medicine 2017; 7(3): 486–491.