Tarrant, C, et al. Consent revisited: the impact of return of results on participants’ views and expectations about trial participation. Health Expectations 2015; 18(6): 2042–2053.
Partridge, AH, et al. Offering participants results of a clinical trial: sharing results of a negative study. Lancet 2005; 365(9463): 963–964.
Fernandez, CV, et al. Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009; 27(6): 878–883.
Baylor, A, et al. Dissemination of research findings to research participants living with HIV in Rural Uganda: challenges and rewards. PLOS Medicine 2013; 10(3): 4.
Trinidad, SB, et al. Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A 2015; 167(7): 1542–1550.
Purvis, R, et al. Qualitative study of participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination. American Journal of Bioethics 2017; 8(2): 69–74.
Long, CR, et al. Health research participants’ preferences for receiving research results. Clinical Trials 2016; 13(6): 582–591.
Partridge, AH, Winer, EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002; 288(3): 363–365.
Chen, PG, et al. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Preventive Medicines 2010; 39(4): 372–378.
Fernandez, C, et al. Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children’s Oncology Group. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 2003; 25(9): 704–708.
Partridge, AH, et al. Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants. Journal of National Cancer Institute 2004; 96(8): 629–632.
Rigby, H, Fernandez, CV. Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting. Blood 2005; 106(4): 1199–1202.
Wilson, PM, et al. Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK. Implementation Science 2010; 5: 61.
McCormack, L, et al. Communication and Dissemination Strategies to Facilitate the Use of Health-Related Evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2013. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments No. 213.
Brownson, RC, et al. Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States. American Journal of Public Health 2013; 103(9): 1693–1699.
Cox, K, et al. Feedback of trial results to participants: a survey of clinicians’ and patients’ attitudes and experiences. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2011; 15(2): 124–129.
Bergman, M. Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2008.
Creswell, JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2013.
Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010.
Creswell, J, et al. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C, eds. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003: 209–240.
Johnson, R, Onweugbuzie, A, Turner, L. Toward a definitions of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2007; 1(2): 112–133.
Johnson, R, Onwuegbuzie, A. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher 2004; 33(7): 14–26.
Sale, JE, Lohfeld, LH, Brazil, K. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: implications for mixed-methods research. Quality and Quantity 2002; 36(1): 43–53.
McElfish, PA, Purvis, RS, Long, CR. Researchers’ experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: study protocol. Contemp Clinical Trials Communications 2018; 11: 95–98.
Long, C, et al. Health researchers’ experiences, perceptions, and barriers related to sharing study results with participants. Health Research Policy and Systems 2019; 17(2
National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa/about. Accessed February 15, 2018.
Harris, P, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Infromatics 2009; 42(2): 377–381.
Shalowitz, DI, Miller, FG. Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions. PLOS Medicine 2008; 5(5): e91.
Fernandez, C, Skedgel, C, Weijer, C. Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2004; 170(9): 1417–1419.
King, N, Cassell, C, Symon, G. Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In: Cassell, C, Symon, G, eds. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
Nadin, S, Cassell, C. Using data matrices. In: Cassell, C, Symon, G, eds. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
Tong, A, Sainsbury, P, Craig, J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–357.
Hennink, M, Hutter, I, Bailey, A. Qualitative Research Methods. London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage Publications, 2011.
Schimanski, LA Alperin, JP. The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future. F1000Research 2018; 7(1605): 1–21.
Marrero, DG, et al. Promotion and tenure for community-engaged research: an examination of promotion and tenure support for community-engaged research at three universities collaborating through a Clinical and Translational Science Award. Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6(3): 204–208.
McElfish, P, et al. Health research funding agencies’ policies, recommendations, and tools for dissemination. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 2018; 12(4): 473–482.
Curran, D, Kekewich, M, Foreman, T. Examining the use of consent forms to promote dissemination of research results to participants. Research Ethics 2018; 15: 1–2
Markman, M. Providing research participants with findings from completed cancer-related clinical trials: not quite as simple as it sounds. Cancer 2006; 106(7): 1421–1424.
MacNeil, SD, Fernandez, CV. Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 2007; 33(9): 549–553.
Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard. Return of Aggregate Results to Participants Principles. Cambridge, MA,: Harvard University; 201
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services TSsA, Protections CoHR. Sharing Study Data and Results: Return of Individual Results (Attachment B), 2016.
The National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine. Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm, 2018.