Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards

  • Christi A. Patten (a1) (a2), Monica L. Albertie (a3), Chara A. Chamie (a4), Tabetha A. Brockman (a2), Mary Gorfine (a5), Rosa Nicholas (a6), Martha J. Bock (a1), Janet M. Okamoto (a7), Sumedha G. Penheiter (a8) and Joyce E. Balls-Berry (a2)...

Abstract

Over 80% of CTSA programs have a community advisory board (CAB). Little is known about how research discussed with CABs aligns with community priorities (bidirectionality). This program evaluation assessed researcher presentations from 2014 to 2018 to the CABs linked to our CTSA at all three sites (Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida) for relevance to local community needs identified in 2013 and/or 2016. From content analysis, of 65 presentations total, 41 (63%) addressed ≥1 local health needs (47% Minnesota, 60% Florida, and 80% Arizona). Cross-cutting topics were cancer/cancer prevention (physical activity/obesity/nutrition) and mental health. Results could help to prioritize health outcomes of community-engaged research efforts.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ncnd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: C. A. Patten, PhD, Mayo Clinic, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, 200 First Street SW, BioBusiness Building 5–26, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Email: patten.christi@mayo.edu

References

Hide All
1. Institute of Medicine. The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for Advancing Clinical and Translational Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.
2. Balas, EA. From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine. Pediatric Annals 1998; 27: 581584.
3. Morris, ZS, Wooding, S, Grant, J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2011; 104: 510520.
4. Austin, CP. Translating translation. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2018; 17: 455456.
5. CTSA Community Engagement Key Function Committee. Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: NIH; 2011.
6. Cyril, S, et al. Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review. Global Health Action 2015; 8: 29842.
7. O’Mara-Eves, A, et al. Community Engagement to Reduce Inequalities in Health: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis And Economic Analysis. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2013.
8. Newman, SD, et al. Community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a synthesis of best processes. Preventing Chronic Disease 2011; 8: A70.
9. Wilkins, CH, et al. Community representatives’ involvement in clinical and translational science awardee activities. Clinical and Translational Science 2013; 6: 292296.
10. Matthews, AK, et al. A community engagement advisory board as a strategy to improve research engagement and build institutional capacity for community-engaged research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2018; 2: 6672.
11. Matthews, AK, et al. Evaluation of 3 approaches for increasing patient engagement in clinical research: feedback from a community engagement advisory board. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2018; 2: 1419.
12. Matthews, AK, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a community engagement advisory board: strategies for maximizing success. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2018; 2: 813.
13. Cramer, ME, et al. Community advisory board members’ perspectives regarding opportunities and challenges of research collaboration. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2018; 40: 10321048.
14. Halladay, JR, et al. Community advisory boards guiding engaged research efforts within a clinical translational sciences award: key contextual factors explored. Progress in Community Health Partnerships 2017; 11: 367377.
15. Wallerstein, N, Duran, B. Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health 2010; 100(Suppl 1): S40–S46.
16. Mayo Clinic. Community health needs assessment. Retrieved from http://communityengagement.mayoclinic.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Community-health-needs-assessment-Dotorg-December-2016-final.pdf, 2016, accessed February 25, 2019.
17. Krippendorff, KH. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2013.
18. Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 3746.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed