Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:09:44.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variable Expression of the Autism Broader Phenotype: Findings from Extended Pedigrees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2000

A. Pickles
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, U.K
E. Starr
Affiliation:
University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada
S. Kazak
Affiliation:
Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi, Ankara, Turkey
P. Bolton
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, U.K.
K. Papanikolaou
Affiliation:
“Aghia Sophia” Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
A. Bailey
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, U.K
R. Goodman
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, U.K
M. Rutter
Affiliation:
MRC Child Psychiatry Unit and the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, U.K
Get access

Abstract

Factors influencing the rate, form, and severity of phenotypic expression among relatives of autistic probands are examined. Family history data on 3095 first- and second-degree relatives and cousins from 149 families with a child with autism and 36 families with a child with Down syndrome are studied. The results provide further evidence of an increased risk among autism relatives for the broadly defined autism phenotype. Of proband characteristics, severity of autism and obstetric optimality were confirmed as being related to familial loading for probands with speech. There was little variation in loading among probands lacking speech. The type of phenotypic profile reported in relatives appeared little influenced by characteristics of the relative or the proband, except for variation by degree of relative, parental status of relative, and perhaps proband's birth optimality score. Phenotypic rates among parents suggested reduced fitness for the severest and more communication-related forms of expression but not for the more mild and social forms of expression. Patterns of expression within the families did not support a simple X-linked nor an imprinted X-linked mode of inheritance. The basis for sex differences in rates of expression is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)