Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Behaviour and Development of Stunted and Nonstunted Jamaican Children

  • Julie M. Meeks Gardner (a1), Sally M. Grantham-McGregor (a2), John Himes (a3) and Susan Chang (a1)

Abstract

In order to examine the mechanism whereby stunted children have poor developmental levels, we compared the behaviour of stunted (N=78) and nonstunted (N=26) children aged 12 to 24 months, and examined the relationship of their behaviour to their developmental levels. The effect of nutritional supplementation with or without psychosocial stimulation on the stunted children's behaviour was also examined. The children were observed at home during 4 days over a period of 6 months. The stunted children showed significantly more apathy, and less enthusiasm and variety in exploring, were less happy and more fussy. Caretakers' vocalisations to them were less warm or instructive. Stunted children's activity level, exploratory and happy behaviours were predictive of change in developmental levels measured on the Griffiths Scales, from enrolment to 12 and 24 months later. Supplementation predicted mental age at 12 and 24 months after enrolment, however, it had no significant effect on behaviour.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Requests for reprints to: J. M. Meeks Gardner, Tropical Metabolism Research Unit, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston 7, Jamaica, West Indies.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Behaviour and Development of Stunted and Nonstunted Jamaican Children

  • Julie M. Meeks Gardner (a1), Sally M. Grantham-McGregor (a2), John Himes (a3) and Susan Chang (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.