Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Pragmatics in acquisition*

  • EVE V. CLARK (a1)

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted several areas where pragmatics plays a central role in the process of acquiring a first language. In talking with their children, adults display their uses of language in each context, and offer extensive feedback on form, meaning, and usage, within their conversational exchanges. These interactions depend critically on joint attention, physical co-presence, and conversational co-presence – essential factors that help children assign meanings, establish reference, and add to common ground. For young children, getting their meaning across also depends on realizing language is conventional, that words contrast in meaning, and that they need to observe Grice's cooperative principle in conversation. Adults make use of the same pragmatic principles as they solicit repairs to what children say, and thereby offer feedback on both what the language is and how to use it.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

Address for correspondence: Eve V. Clark, Department of Linguistics, Margaret Jacks Hall–Bldg 460, Stanford, CA 94305-2150, USA; e-mail: eclark@stanford.edu

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Baldwin, D. A. (1991). Infants' contribution to the achievement of joint reference. Child Development 62, 875–90.
Baldwin, D. A. & Baird, J. A. (2001). Discerning intentions in dynamic human action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 171–8.
Bavelas, J. B. & Chovil, N. (2006). Hand gestures and facial displays as part of language use in face-to-face dialogue. In Mausov, V. & Patterson, M. (eds), Handbook of nonverbal communication, 97115. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bloom, L., Margulis, C., Tinker, E. & Fujita, N. (1996). Early conversations and word learning: contributions from child and adult. Child Development 67, 3154–75.
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Casillas, M. A., Bobb, S. B. & Clark, E. V. (2014). Turn taking, timing, and planning in early language acquisition. Unpublished ms, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Childers, J. B., Vaughan, J. & Burquest, D. A. (2007). Joint attention and word learning in Ngas-speaking toddlers in Nigeria. Journal of Child Language 33, 199225.
Chouinard, M. M. & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30, 637–69.
Clark, E. V. (1982). Language change during language acquisition. In Lamb, M. E. & Brown, A. L. (eds), Advances in developmental psychology, vol. 2, 171–95. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 133. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–31.
Clark, E. V. (1995). Language acquisition: the lexicon and syntax. In Miller, J. L. & Eimas, P. D. (eds), Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.), vol. 11: speech, language, and communication, 303–37. New York: Academic Press.
Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition 64, 137.
Clark, E. V. (1998). Lexical structure and pragmatic directions in acquisition. In Gruber, M. C., Higgins, D., Olson, K. S. & Wysocki, T. (eds), Papers from the 34th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 1998: the panels, 437–46. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Clark, E. V. (2010). Adult offer, word-class, and child uptake in early lexical acquisition. First Language 30, 250–69.
Clark, E. V. (2014). Common ground. In MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W. (eds), The handbook of language emergence. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Clark, E. V. (in press). Semantics and language acquisition. In Lappin, S. & Fox, C. (eds), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Clark, E. V. & Bernicot, J. (2008). Repetition as ratification: how parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language 35, 349–71.
Clark, E. V. & Estigarribia, B. (2011). Using speech and gesture to inform young children about unfamiliar word meanings. Gesture 11, 123.
Clark, E. V. & Grossman, J. G. (1998). Pragmatic directions and children's word learning. Journal of Child Language 25, 118.
Clark, E. V. & Kurumada, C. (2013). ‘Be brief’: necessity or choice? In Goldstein, L. (ed.), Brevity, 233–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, E. V. & de Marneffe, M.-C. (2012). Constructing verb paradigms in French: adult construals and emerging grammatical contrasts. Morphology 22, 89120.
Clark, E. V. & Wong, A. D.-W. (2002). Pragmatic directions about language use: words and word meanings. Language in Society 31, 181212.
Corrin, J. (2010). Maternal repair initiation at MLU Stage 1: the developmental power of ‘hm?’. First Language 30, 312–28.
Csibra, G. (2010). Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind and Language 25, 141–68.
Estigarribia, B. & Clark, E. V. (2007). Getting and maintaining attention in talk to young children. Journal of Child Language 34, 799814.
Ferrier, L. J. (1978). Some observations of error in context. In Waterson, N. & Snow, C. (eds), The development of communication, 301–9. New York: Wiley.
Fisher, C. & Tokura, H. (1995). The given–new contract in speech to infants. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 287310.
Gallaway, C. & Richards, B. J. (eds) (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gelman, S. A., Coley, J. D., Rosengren, K. S., Hartman, E. & Pappas, A. (1998). Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (Serial No. 253).
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415, 755.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Goodrich, W., Sauer, E. & Iverson, J. (2007). Young children use their hands to tell their mothers what to say. Developmental Science 10, 778–85.
Haviland, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 512–21.
Hills, T. T., Maouebe, M., Maouene, J., Sheya, A. & Smith, L. (2009). Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: preferential attachment or preferential acquisition? Psychological Science 20, 729–39.
Iverson, J. M. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2005). Gesture paves the way for language development. Psychological Science 16, 368–71.
Kelly, B. F. (2011). A new look at redundancy in children's gesture and word combinations. In Arnon, I. & Clark, E. V. (eds), Experience, variation, and generalization: learning a first language, 7389. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kemler-Nelson, D. (1995). Principle-based inferences in young children's categorization: revisiting the impact of function on the naming of artifacts. Cognitive Development 10, 347–80.
Kobayashi, H. (1998). How 2-year-old children learn novel part names of unfamiliar objects. Cognition 68, B41B51.
Landau, B., Smith, L. & Jones, S. (1998). Object shape, object function, and object name. Journal of Memory and Language 38, 127.
Masur, E. F. (1997). Maternal labeling of novel and familiar objects: implications for children's development of lexical constraints. Journal of Child Language 24, 427–39.
Matthews, D., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2010). What's in a manner of speaking? Children's sensitivity to partner-specific referential precedents. Developmental Psychology 46, 749–60.
Olson, J. & Masur, E. F. (2011). Infants’ gestures influence mothers’ provision of object, action, and internal state labels. Journal of Child Language 38, 1028–54.
O'Neill, D. K. (1996). Two-year-old children's sensitivity to a parent's knowledge state when making requests. Child Development 67, 659–77.
Rader, N. de V. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (2010). How the hands control attention during early word learning. Gesture 10, 203–22.
Roy, B. C., Frank, M. C. & Roy, D. (2012). Relating activity contexts to early word learning in dense longitudinal data. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 935–940). Sapporo, Japan.
Saxton, M. (2000). Negative evidence and negative feedback: immediate effects on the grammaticality of child speech. First Language 20, 221–52.
Shatz, M. (1978). On the development of communicative understanding: an early strategy for interpreting and responding to messages. Cognitive Psychology 10, 271301.
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Talking to children: language input and acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E. & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 10587–92.
Tomasello, M. (1995). Joint attention as social cognition. In Moore, C. & Dunham, P. J. (eds), Joint attention: its origins and role in development, 103–30. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Pragmatics in acquisition*

  • EVE V. CLARK (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.