Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:40:26.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patterns of vowel modification in mother–child speech*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Nan Bernstein Ratner
Nan Bernstein Ratner
Affiliation:
University of Maryland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patterns of vowel articulation in conversational speech to an adult and to child listeners were analysed in the speech of nine mothers. Formant frequency analysis of vowels embedded in 2,406 words found in varying syntactic environments and uttered by women to pre-verbal, holophrastic and more advanced child listeners (MLUs 2·5–4·0) revealed an emerging pattern of content word clarification, as measured by wider dispersion and decreased overlap between vowel phoneme categories in formant characteristics. Additionally, function word clarification was noted in speech to the oldest children. Vowel production appears to be modulated by child–addressee language ability. Earlier studies suggesting a lack of phonetic clarification in mother–child speech may have investigated speech to children too mature to elicit maternal clarification behaviours.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , October 1984 , pp. 557 - 578
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bard, E. & Anderson, A. (1983). The unintelligibility of speech to children. JChLang 10. 265–92.Google ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, N. E. (1982). An acoustic study of mothers' speech to language-learning children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Broad, D. & Wakita, H. (1977). A phonetic approach to automatic vowel recognition. In Bole, L. (ed.), Natural language communication with computers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Centmayer, K. (1975). Interrelations of vowel perception and linguistic context. In Fant, G. & Tatham, M. A., (eds), Auditory analysis and perception of speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chen, F. (1980). Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech at the segmental level. Unpublished master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Cole, R. (1979). Navigating the slippery stream of speech. Psychology Today, April, 77–87.Google Scholar
Cole, R. & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In Cole, R. (ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, G. & Grubb, P. (1961). A psychophysical investigation of vowel formants. JSpHearRes 4. 203–19.Google ScholarPubMed
Kavanagh, J. & Cutting, J. (eds). (1975). The role of speech in language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. JPhon 3. 129–40.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. (1976). FBMain program for formant analysis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. & Stevens, K. N. (1973). On the automatic recognition of continuous speech: implications of a spectrogram-reading experiment. IEEE Trans. Audio. & Electroacous. Au-21, 210–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, P. (1967). Intonation, perception and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Malsheen, B. (1980). Two hypotheses for phonetic clarification in the speech of mothers to children. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, J. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Child phonology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moslin, B. (1979). The role of phonetic input in the child's acquisition of the voiced–voiceless contrast in English stops: a VOT analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar
Newport, E. L. (1976). Motherese: the speech of mothers to young children. In Castellan, N., Pisoni, D. B. & Potts, G. R. (eds), Cognitive theory. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Oiler, D. K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. JAcS 54. 1235–47.Google Scholar
Oshika, B., Zue, V., Weeks, R., Neu, H. & Aurbach, J. (1975). The role of phonological rules in speech understanding research. IEEE Trans. Acous., Sp. & Signal Proc. ASSP 23. 104–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. & Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. JAcS 24. 175–84.Google Scholar
Picheny, M. A. (1981). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Pickett, J. M. & Pollack, I. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: effects of rate of utterance and duration of excerpt. L & S 6. 151–64Google Scholar
Pollack, I. & Pickett, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversational speech. L & S 6. 165–71.Google Scholar
Pollack, I. (1964). The intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: auditory vs. structural context. JVLB 3. 79–84.Google Scholar
Reddy, D. R. (1976). Speech recognition by machine: a review. Proc. of IEEE. 64. 501–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockey, L. & Bond, Z. S. (1980). Phonological processes in speech addressed to children. Phonetica 37. 267–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar