Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Past tense productivity in Dutch children with and without SLI: the role of morphophonology and frequency*

  • JUDITH E. RISPENS (a1) and ELISE H. DE BREE (a2)

Abstract

This study focuses on morphophonology and frequency in past tense production. It was assessed whether Dutch five- and seven-year-old typically developing (TD) children and eight-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) produce the correct allomorph in regular, irregular, and novel past tense formation. Type frequency of the allomorph, token frequency and phonotactic probability (PP) of the novel verb form are considered. The results showed all groups were sensitive to the phonological cue. PP did not contribute to past tense inflection of novel verbs in any of the groups, but type frequency did in all three groups. Only the seven-year-old typically developing children relied on token frequency for inflection of regulars. The findings point to an important role of phonology and frequency in past tense acquisition for both TD children and children with SLI. We discuss how the SLI performance pattern relates to theories on SLI.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

Address for correspondence: Judith Rispens, University of Amsterdam – Linguistics, Spuistraat 210 Amsterdam 1012 VT, Netherlands. e-mail: J.E.Rispens@uva.nl

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Adriaans, F. (2006). PhonotacTools (Test version). [Computer program]. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. CD-ROM. Philadelphia, PA. Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
Beers, M. (1995). The phonology of normally developing and language impaired children. (IFOTT dissertation series, No. 20). Amsterdam: IFOTT.
Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word 14, 150–77.
Blom, E. & Paradis, J. (in press). Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.
de Bree, E. & Kerkhoff, A. (2010). Bempen or bemben: differences between children at-risk of dyslexia and children with SLI on a morpho-phonological task. Scientific Studies of Reading 14, 85109.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425–55.
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: C.U.P.
Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: O.U.P.
Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Robinson, P. & Ellis, N. (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Bybee, J. & Slobin, D. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58, 265–89.
Chiat, S. (2001). Mapping theories of developmental language impairment: premises, predictions and evidence. Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 113–42.
Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (1980). Rule learning and the English inflections (with special emphasis on the plural). In Prideaux, G. D., Derwing, B. L. & Baker, W. J. (eds.), Experimental linguistics: integration of theory and applications. Ghent: E.Stroy-Scientia.
Ernestus, M. & Baayen, H. (2001). Choosing between the Dutch past tense suffixes -te and -de. In van der Wouden, T. and de Hoop, H. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001, 7787. Amsterdam.
Ernestus, M. & Baayen, H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 18, 538.
Finneran, D. A. & Leonard, L. B. (2010). Role of linguistic input in third person singular -s use in the speech of young children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 1065–74.
Forrest, K. & Morrisette, M. L. (1999). Feature analysis of segmental errors in children with phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42, 187–94.
Goddijn, S. & Binnenpoorte, D. (2003). Assessing manually corrected broad phonetic transcriptions in the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1361–64. Barcelona.
Gor, K. (2007). Experimental study of first and second language morphological processing. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. & Spivey, M. J. (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics. Ithaca: John Benjamins.
Hsu, H. J. & Bishop, D. V. M. (2011). Grammatical difficulties in children with specific language impairment: is learning deficient? Human Development 21(53), 264–77.
Joanisse, M. F. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1998). Specific Language Impairment in children: an impairment in grammar or processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 240–46.
Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A. & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 630–45.
Kager, R., van der Feest, S., Fikkert, P., Kerkhoff, A. & Zamuner, T. (2007). Representations of [voice]. Evidence from acquisition. In van de Weijer, J. & van der Torre, E. J. (eds.), Voicing in Dutch: (de)voicing phonology, phonetics, and psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kerkhoff, A., de Bree, E., Kager, R. & Zonneveld, W. (2011). Voicing errors in regular past tense inflection. Presentation at the Tin dag, Utrecht, February 2011.
Kidd, E. & Kirjavainen, E. (2011). Investigating the contribution of procedural and declarative memory to the acquisition of the past tense: evidence from Finnish. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 794829.
van der Lely, H. K. J. & Ullman, M. (2001). Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes 16, 177217.
Leonard, L. B. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leonard, L. B., Davis, J. & Deevy, P. (2007). Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21, 747–58.
Leonard, L. B., Ellis Weismer, S., Miller, C. A., Francis, D. J., Tomblin, J. B. & Kail, R. V. (2007). Speed of processing, working memory, and language impairment in children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 408–28.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk: Vol. 2. The database. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Marchman, V. A. (1997). Children's productivity in the English past tense: the role of frequency, phonology, and neighbourhood structure. Cognitive Science 21, 283304.
Marchman, V. A. & Bates, E. (1994). Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. Journal of Child Language 21, 339–66.
Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B. & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: a study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42, 206–19.
Marinis, T. (2011). On the nature and cause of Specific Language Impairment: a view from sentence processing and infant research. Lingua 121, 463–75.
Marinis, T. & Chondrogianni, V. (2011). Comprehension of reflexives and pronouns in sequential bilingual children: do they pattern similarly to L1 children, L2 adults, or children with specific language impairment? Journal of Neurolinguistics 24, 202–12.
Marshall, C. & van der Lely, H. (2006). A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: the impact of phonotactics. Cognition 100, 302–20.
Marshall, C. & van der Lely, H. (2007). The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9, 191203.
Matthews, D. E. & Theakston, A. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children's production of plurals and the past tense: the effects of frequency, phonology, and competition. Cognitive Science 30, 1027–52.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Ernestus, M. & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Do type and token effects reflect different mechanisms? Connectionist modeling of Dutch past-tense formation and final devoicing. Brain and Language 90, 287–98.
Oetting, J. & Horohov, J. (1997). Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 40, 6274.
Paradis, J. (2010). Bilingual children's acquisition of English verb morphology: effects of language exposure, structure complexity, and task type. Language Learning 60, 651–80.
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E., Crago, M. & Genesee, F. (2010). Bilingual children's acquisition of the past tense: a usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 38, 554–78.
Raven, J. (2006). Raven Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM). Enschede: Harcourt Test Publishers.
Rice, M., Wexler, K. & Cleave, P. (1995). Specific language impairment as a period of optional infinitive. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 38, 850–63.
Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III NL. Amsterdam: Harcourt Test Publisher.
Song, J. Y., Sundara, M. & Demuth, K. (2009). Effects of phonology on children's production of English 3rd person singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 52, 623–42.
Vitevitch, M. S. & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 374408.
Zonneveld, W. (1983). Lexical and phonological properties of Dutch voicing assimilation. In van de Broecke, M., van Heuven, V. & Zonneveld, W. (eds.), Sound and structure: Studies for Antonie Cohen, 297312. Dordrecht: Foris.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed