Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants*

  • STEFANIE RAMACHERS (a1), SUSANNE BROUWER (a1) and PAULA FIKKERT (a1)

Abstract

Despite the fact that many of the world's languages use lexical tone, the majority of language acquisition studies has focused on non-tone languages. Research on tone languages has typically investigated well-known tone languages such as Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese. The current study looked at a Limburgian dialect of Dutch that uses lexical pitch differences, albeit in a rather restricted way. Using a visual habituation paradigm, 6- to 12-month-old Limburgian and Dutch infants were tested for their ability to discriminate Limburgian tones. The results showed that both Limburgian and Dutch infants discriminate the Limburgian tones throughout their first year of life. The role of linguistic experience, acoustic salience, and the degree of similarity to the native prosodic system are discussed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Stefanie Ramachers, Erasmusplein 1, Nijmegen 6500 HD, the Netherlands. e-mail: s.ramachers@let.ru.nl

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

This research was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (322-75-001) to the first author, and appears as part of the first author's dissertation. Thanks to all participating parents and their infants from Nijmegen and Roermond, the Baby Research Center in Nijmegen, daycare center ‘Ot en Sien’ in Roermond, and GGD Limburg Noord in Roermond. We also thank Carlos Gussenhoven for his helpful knowledge and advice on the Limburgian tones and on stimuli preparation, as well as for his feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. Thanks also to the research group First Language Acquisition at Radboud University Nijmegen for valuable discussion, and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Bakker, F. & Hout, R. van (2012). De afgrenzing tussen de noordelijke en zuidelijke dialecten in Noord-Limburg. Taal en Tongval 64(2), 159–93.
Best, C. T. (1994). The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. In Goodman, J. & Nusbaum, H. (eds), The development of speech perception: the transition from speech to spoken words, 167224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: issues in cross-language research, 171204. Timonium, MD: York Press.
Best, C. T. & Jones, C. (1998). Stimulus-alternation preference procedure to test infant speech discrimination. Infant Behavior and Development 21, 295.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. & Goodell, E. (2001). Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(2), 775–94.
Best, C. T., McRoberts, G. W. & Sithole, N. M. (1988). Examination of perceptual reorganization for non-native speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14(3) 345–60.
van Bezooijen, R. & van den Berg, R. (1999). Word intelligibility of language varieties in the Netherlands and Flanders under minimal conditions. In van Bezooijen, R. & Kager, R. (eds), Linguistics in the Netherlands 16, 112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blom, E., Boerma, T., Bosma, E., Cornips, L. & Everaert, E. (2017). Cognitive advantages of bilingual children in different sociolinguistic contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 8(552). Online <doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00552>.
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2012). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.22. Online <http://www.praat.org/>.
Bosch, L. & Ramon-Casas, M. (2011). Variability in vowel production by bilingual speakers: Can input properties hinder the early stabilization of contrastive categories? Journal of Phonetics 39, 514–25.
Braun, B. & Johnson, E. (2011). Question or tone 2? How language experience and linguistic function guide pitch processing. Journal of Phonetics 39, 585–94.
Bruce, G. (1977). Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.
Chen, A. & Kager, R. (2016). Discrimination of lexical tones in the first year of life. Infant and Child Development, 25 426–39.
Cornips, L. (2014). Socio-syntax and variation in acquisition: problematizing monolingual and bidialectal acquisition. In Grohmann, K. K. (Ed.), Three factors and beyond: socio-syntax and language acquisition. Special issue of Linguistic Variation 14(1), 125.
Driessen, G. (2006). Ontwikkelingen in het gebruik van streektalen en dialecten in de periode 1995–2003. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 75, 103–13.
Duanmu, S. (2000). The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M. & Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Pearson.
Durrant, S., Delle Luche, C., Cattani, A. & Floccia, C. (2015). Monodialectal and multidialectal infants’ representation of familiar words. Journal of Child Language 42, 447–65.
Fennell, C. T., Tsui, A. S. & Hudon, T. M. (2016). Speech perception in simultaneously bilingual infants. In Nicoladis, E. & Montanari, S. (eds), Bilingualism across the lifespan, 4362. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Fernald, A. & Hurtado, N. (2006). Names in frames: infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation. Developmental Science 9(3), F3340.
Fournier, R. (2008). Perception of the tone contrast in East-Limburgian dialects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Fournier, R., Gussenhoven, C., Jensen, O. & Hagoort, P. (2010). Lateralization of tonal and intonational pitch processing: an MEG study. Brain Research 1328, 7988.
Fournier, R., Verhoeven, J., Swerts, M. & Gussenhoven, C. (2006): Perceiving word prosodic contrasts as a function of sentence prosody in two Dutch Limburgian dialects. Journal of Phonetics 34(1), 2948.
Frota, S., Butler, J. & Vigário, M. (2014). Infants’ perception of intonation: Is it a statement or a question? Infancy 19(2), 194213.
Geffen, S. & Mintz, T. (2011). Seven-month-olds discrimination of statements and questions. In Biller, A. K., Chung, E. Y. & Kimball, A. E. (eds), Online Supplement of the Proceedings of the 36th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Goss, S. (2015). The effects of internal and experience-based factors on the perception of lexical pitch accent by native and nonnative Japanese listeners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Gussenhoven, C. (2000a). On the origin and development of the Central Franconian tone contrast. In Lahiri, A. (ed.), Analogy, leveling, markedness: principles of change in phonology and morphology, 215–60. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.
Gussenhoven, C. (2000b). The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in Optimality Theory. In Horne, M. (ed.), Prosody: theory and experiment, 129–67. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
Gussenhoven, C. (2001). Suprasegmentals. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B. (eds), International encyclopedia of the social and the behavioural sciences, 15294–98. Oxford: Pergamon.
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). Tone in Germanic: comparing Limburgian with Swedish. In Fant, G., Fujisaki, H., Cao, J., & Xu, Y. (eds), From traditional phonology to modern speech processing, 129–36. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Gussenhoven, C. (2005). Transcription of Dutch intonation. In Jun, S.-A. (ed.), Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing, 118–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gussenhoven, C. & Bruce, G. (1999). Word prosody and intonation. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 233–66. Berlin, New-York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gussenhoven, C. & Peters, J. (2008). De tonen van het Limburgs. Nederlandse Taalkunde 13(1), 87114.
Gussenhoven, C. & van der Vliet, P. (1999). The phonology of tone and intonation in the Dutch dialect of Venlo. Journal of Linguistics 35, 99135.
Hallé, P., Chang, Y.-C. & Best, C. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics 32(3), 395421.
Harrison, P. (2000). Acquiring the phonology of lexical tone in infancy. Lingua 110, 581616.
Hay, J. F., Graf Estes, K., Wang, T. & Saffran, J. R. (2015). From flexibility to constraint: the contrastive use of lexical tone in early word learning. Child Development 86(1), 1022.
Heijmans, L. (2003). The relationship between tone and vowel length in two neighboring Dutch Limburgian dialects. In Fikkert, P. & Jakobs, H. (eds), Development in prosodic systems, 746, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., Herold, B., Weissenborn, J. & Nazzi, T. (2009). Language specific prosodic preferences during the first half year of life: evidence from German and French infants. Infant Behavior and Development 32, 262–74.
Horowitz, F. D. (1975). Visual attention, auditory stimulation, and language discrimination in infants. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 39(5/6), Serial No. 158.
Houston, D., Horn, D., Qi, R., Ting, J. & Gao, S. (2007). Assessing speech discrimination in individual infants. Infancy 12(2), 119–45.
Hyman, L. M. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: the case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31 213238.
Jusczyck, P. W., Cutler, A. & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English. Child Development 64, 675–87.
Kats, J. C. (1985). Remunjs Woardebook. Roermond: H. van der Marck en Zonen.
Köhnlein, B. (2016). Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects. Phonology 33, 87123.
Kristoffersen, G. (2000). The phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kuhl, P., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Degushi, T., Kiritani, S. & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science 9, F1321.
Kuhl, P., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N. & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by six months of age. Science 255, 606–8.
Liu, L. & Kager, R. (2014). Perception of tones by infants learning a non-tone language. Cognition 133, 385–94.
Mattock, K. & Burnham, D. (2006). Chinese and English infants’ tone perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization. Infancy 10, 241–65.
Mattock, K., Molnar, M., Polka, L. & Burnham, D. (2008). The developmental course of lexical tone perception in the first year of life. Cognition 106, 1367–81.
Meints, K. & Woodford, A. (2008). Lincoln Infant Lab Package 1.0: a new programme package for IPL, Preferential Listening, Habituation and Eyetracking. Online: <http://www.lincoln.ac.uk/psychology/babylab.htm>.
Narayan, C. R., Werker, J. F. & Beddor, P. S. (2010). The interaction between acoustic salience and language experience in developmental speech perception: evidence from nasal place discrimination. Developmental Science 13(3), 407–20.
Nazzi, T., Floccia, C. & Bertoncini, J. (1998). Discrimination of pitch contours by neonates. Infant Behavior and Development 21, 779–84.
O'Grady, W., Archibald, J., Aronoff, , M. & Rees-Miller, J. (eds) (2001). Contemporary linguistics. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Ota, M. (2003). The development of lexical pitch accent systems. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 48(3/4), 357–83.
Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W. & Achim, A. (2000). Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiology and Neuro-Otology 5, 111–39.
Polka, L. & Bohn, O. (1996). A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100(1), 577–92.
Polka, L. & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 421–35.
Quam, C. & Swingley, D. (2010). Phonological knowledge guides 2-year-olds' and adults' interpretation of salient pitch contours in word learning. Journal of Memory and Language 62, 135–50.
Reid, A., Burnham, D., Kasisopa, B., Reilly, R., Attina, V., Rattanasone, N. X. & Best, C. T. (2014). Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 77, 571–91.
Riad, T. (2013). The phonology of Swedish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y. & Mazuka, R. (2009). Development of hemispheric specialization for lexical pitch-accent in Japanese infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(11), 2503–13.
Sato, Y., Sogabe, Y. & Mazuka, R. (2010). Discrimination of phonemic vowel length by Japanese infants. Developmental Psychology 46(1), 106–19.
Schaefer, V. & Darcy, I. (2014). Lexical function of pitch in the first language shapes cross-linguistic perception of Thai tones. Laboratory Phonology 5(4), 489522.
Sebastián-Gallés., N. & Bosch, L. (2009). Developmental shift in the discrimination of vowel contrasts in bilingual infants: Is the distributional account all there is to it? Developmental Science 12, 874–87.
Singh, L. & Fu, C. S. L. (2016). A new view of language development: the acquisition of lexical tone. Child Development 87(3), 834–54.
Singh, L., Hui, T. J., Chan, C. & Michnick Golinkoff, R. (2014). Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation. Developmental Science 17(1), 94109.
Skoruppa, K., Pons, F., Christophe, A., Bosch, L., Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Alves Limussuri, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2009). Language-specific stress perception by 9-month-old French and Spanish infants. Developmental Science 12(6), 914–9.
Snow, C. E. (1977). The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language 4(1), 122.
So, C. & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech 53(2), 273–93.
So, C. & Best, C. T. (2014). Phonetic influences on English and French listeners’ assimilation of Mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36, 195221.
Soderstrom, M., Ko, E.-S. & Nevzorova, U. (2011). It's a question? Infants attend differently to yes/no questions and declaratives. Infant Behavior and Development 34, 107110.
Stager, C. L. & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature 388, 381–2.
Tamaoka, K., Saito, N., Kiyama, S., Timmer, K. & Verdonschot, R. (2014). Is pitch accent necessary for comprehension by Japanese speakers? – An ERP investigation. Journal of Neurolinguistics 27, 3140.
Tsao, F. M. (2008). The effect of acoustical similarity on lexical tone perception of one-year-old Mandarin learning infants. Chinese Journal of Psychology 50(2), 111–24.
Tsushima, T., Takizawa, O., Sasaki, M., Shiraki, S., Nishi, K., Kohno, M., Menyuk, P. & Best, C. T. (1994). Discrimination of English /r-l/ and /w-y/ by Japanese infants at 6–12 months: language-specific developmental changes in speech perception abilities. In 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1695–8. Yokohama, Japan.
Turk, A., Nakai, S. & Sugahara, M. (2006). Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: a practical guide. In Sudhoff, S., Lenertová, D., Meyer, R., Pappert, S., Augurzky, P., Mleinek, I., Richter, N. & Schließer, J. (eds), Methods in empirical prosody research, 127. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Voorhoeve, J. (1973). Safwa as a restricted tone system. Studies in African Linguistics 4(1), 122.
Wang, Y., Behne, D., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. (2004). The role of linguistic experience in the hemispheric processing of lexical tone. Applied Psycholinguistics 25, 449–66.
van de Weijer, J. (2001). The importance of single-word utterances for early word recognition. Proceedings of Early Language Acquisition (ELA2001). Lyon: France.
Werker, J. F. & Tees, R. C. (1992). The organization and re-organization of human speech perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience 15, 377402.
Werth, A. (2011). Perzeptionsphonologische Grundlagen der Prosodie. Eine Analyse der mittelfränkischen Tonakzentdistinktion. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Wetterlin, A. (2007). The lexical specification of Norwegian tonal word accents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Konstanz.
van de Wijngaard, T. & Keulen, R. (2007). De indeling van de Limburgse dialecten. In Keulen, R., van de Wijngaard, T., Crompvoets, H. & Walraven, F. (eds), Riek van klank. Inleiding in de Limburgse dialecten, 1523. Sittard: Veldeke Limburg.
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A. & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: a professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC, Genoa, Italy.
Wu, X., Tu, J.-Y. & Wang, Y. (2012). Native and nonnative processing of Japanese pitch accent. Applied Psycholinguistics 33, 623–41.
Wu, Z. (2000). From traditional Chinese phonology to modern speech technology: realization of tone and intonation in spoken Chinese. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000), Vol. 1, B1–B12.
Yeung, H. H., Chen, K. H. & Werker, J. (2013.). When does native language input affect phonetic perception? The precocious case of lexical tone. Journal of Memory and Language 68(2), 123–39.
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants*

  • STEFANIE RAMACHERS (a1), SUSANNE BROUWER (a1) and PAULA FIKKERT (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.