Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:14:22.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning how to use verbs: lexical coding and the influence of the input*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Jill G. De Villiers
Jill G. De Villiers
Affiliation:
Smith College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Samples of spontaneous speech from two young children and their mothers were analysed to examine how children learn some of the inflectional/syntactic possibilities for individual verbs. Multiple regression analyses were performed to establish predictors of the children's range of grammatical use of particular verbs. Maternal variety of use proved to be a highly significant predictor of the children's use of the same verbs, but maternal frequency was not a significant predictor of children's use. Step-wise regression analyses revealed that each child's own mother's use was a significantly better predictor of the child's use than that of the unacquainted mother. It is argued that the children were monitoring the grammatical patterns of use of individual verbs in the input they received. The extent of novel use of verbs by the child cannot be assessed from these data, and awaits further experimental investigation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Child Language , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , October 1985 , pp. 587 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akmajian, A. & Heny, F. (1975). An introduction to the principles of transformational syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. M., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflections in child language. Lg 56. 387–412.Google Scholar
Bowerman, M. F. (1982). Reorganizational processes in lexical and syntactic development. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L.. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monogr. Soc. Res. Ch. Devel. 41, Serial No. 164.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (1978). A realistic transformational grammar. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller., G. (eds), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (1980). The process of rule learning in child speech: a new look. In Nelson., K. (ed.), Children's language, Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A. (1982). On the nature of syntactic development. In Kuczaj., S. (ed.), Language development. Vol. 1, Syntax and semantics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. (1979). How to get from words to sentences. In Aaronson, D. & Rieber, R. W. (eds), Perspectives in psycholinguistics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M. P. & Chalkley, M. A. (1980). The internal language of children's syntax: the ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Nelson., K. (ed.), Children's language. Vol. 2. New York: Gardner Press.Google Scholar