Skip to main content Accessibility help

Infant-directed speech from seven to nineteen months has similar acoustic properties but different functions

  • Marina KALASHNIKOVA (a1) and Denis BURNHAM (a1)


This longitudinal study assessed three acoustic components of maternal infant-directed speech (IDS) – pitch, affect, and vowel hyperarticulation – in relation to infants’ age and their expressive vocabulary size. These three individual components were measured in IDS addressed to infants at 7, 9, 11, 15, and 19 months (N = 18). All three components were exaggerated at all ages in mothers’ IDS compared to their adult-directed speech. Importantly, the only significant predictor of infants’ expressive vocabulary size at 15 and 19 months was vowel hyperarticulation, but only at 9 months and beyond, not at 7 months, and not pitch or affect at any age. These results set apart vowel hyperarticulation in IDS to infants as the critical IDS component for vocabulary development. Thus IDS, specifically the degree of vowel hyperarticulation therein, is a vehicle by which parents can provide the most optimal speech quality for their infants’ linguistic and communicative development.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Infant-directed speech from seven to nineteen months has similar acoustic properties but different functions
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Infant-directed speech from seven to nineteen months has similar acoustic properties but different functions
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Infant-directed speech from seven to nineteen months has similar acoustic properties but different functions
      Available formats


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Benders, T. (2013). Mommy is only happy! Dutch mothers’ realisation of speech sounds in infant-directed speech expresses emotion, not didactic intent. Infant Behavior and Development, 36, 847–62.
Bergelson, E., & Swingley, D. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9), 3253–8.
Bernstein, N. R. (1983). Patterns of vowel modification in mother–child speech. Journal of Child Language, 11, 557–78.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3. 14) [Computer program]. Retrieved from
Bradlow, A. R., Torretta, G. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication, 20(3/4), 255–72.
Burnham, D., Kitamura, C., & Vollmer-Conna, U. (2002). What's new pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science, 296(5572), 1435.
Burnham, E. B., Wieland, E. A., Kondaurova, M. V., McAuley, J. D., Bergeson, T. R., & Dilley, L. C. (2015). Phonetic modification of vowel space in storybook speech to infants up to 2 years of age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(2), 241–53.
Cartmill, E. A., Armstrong, B. F., Gleitman, L. R., Goldin-Meadow, S., Medina, T. N., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Quality of early parent input predicts child vocabulary 3 years later. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(28), 11278–83.
Chong, S. C. F., Werker, J. F., Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (2003). Three facial expressions mothers direct to their infants. Infant and Child Development, 12(3), 211–32.
Cooper, R. P., & Aslin, R. N. (1990). Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development, 61(5), 1584–95.
Cristia, A. (2013). Input to language: the phonetics and perception of infant-directed speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(3), 157–70.
Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2014). The hyperarticulation hypothesis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 41(4), 913–34.
Cristia, A., Seidl, A., Junge, C., Soderstrom, M., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Predicting individual variation in language from infant speech perception measures. Child Development, 85(4), 1330–45.
Englund, K. T., & Behne, D. M. (2005). Infant directed speech in natural interaction—Norwegian vowel quantity and quality. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(3), 259–80.
Fagel, S. (2010). Effects of smiling on articulation: lips, larynx and acoustics. In Esposito, A., Campbell, N., Vogel, C., Hussain, A., & Nijholt, A. (Eds.), Development of multimodal interfaces: active listening and synchrony (pp. 294303). Berlin: Springer
Fagel, S. (2010). Effects of smiling on articulation: lips, larynx and acoustics. Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony, 294303.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J., Pethic, S. J., … & Stiles, J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(5), i185.
Fernald, A., & Marchman, V. A. (2012). Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development, 83(1), 203–22.
Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 104–13.
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papoušek, M., Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16, 477501.
Fitzgerald, J., Spiegel, D. L., & Cunningham, J. W. (1991). The relationship between parental literacy level and perceptions of emergent literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 23(2), 191213.
Floccia, C., Keren-Portnoy, T., DePaolis, R., Duffy, H., Delle Luche, C., Durrant, S., … & Vihman, M. (2016). British English infants segment words only with exaggerated infant-directed speech stimuli. Cognition, 148, 19.
Graf-Estes, K., & Hurley, K. (2013). Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings. Infancy, 18(5), 797824.
Hartman, K. M., Ratner, N. B., & Newman, R. S. (2017). Infant-directed speech (IDS) vowel clarity and child language outcomes. Journal of Child Language, 44(5), 1140–62.
Hayashi, A., Tamekawa, Y., & Kiritani, S. (2001). Developmental change in auditory preferences for speech stimuli in Japanese infants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(6), 1189–200.
Hurtado, N., Grüter, T., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Relative language exposure, processing efficiency and vocabulary in Spanish–English bilingual toddlers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 189202.
Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. J. (1993). Infants’ preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. Child Development, 64(3), 675–87.
Kalashnikova, M., Carignan, C., & Burnham, D. (2017). The origins of babytalk: smiling, teaching or social convergence? Royal Society Open Science, 4(8). doi:10.1098/rsos.170306.
Kalashnikova, M., Goswami, U., & Burnham, D. (2018). Mothers speak differently to infants at-risk for dyslexia. Developmental Science, 21(1), e12487.
Kalashnikova, M., Schwarz, I. C., & Burnham, D. (2016). OZI: Australian English Communicative Development Inventory. First Language, 36(4), 407–27.
Kaplan, P. S., Danko, C. M., Cejka, A. M., & Everhart, K. D. (2015). Maternal depression and the learning-promoting effects of infant-directed speech: roles of maternal sensitivity, depression diagnosis, and speech acoustic cues. Infant Behaviour and Development, 41, 5263.
Kaplan, P. S., Danko, C. M., Kalinka, C. J., & Cejka, A. M. (2012). A developmental decline in the learning-promoting effects of infant-directed speech for infants of mothers with chronically elevated symptoms of depression. Infant Behaviour and Development, 35(3), 369–79.
Kitamura, C., & Burnham, D. (1998). The infant's response to maternal vocal affect. Advances in Infancy Research, 12, 221–36.
Kitamura, C. & Burnham, D. (2003). Pitch and communicative intent in mothers speech: adjustments for age and sex in the first year. Infancy, 4(1), 85110.
Kitamura, C., & Lam, C. (2009). Age-specific preferences for infant-directed affective intent. Infancy, 14(1), 77100.
Kitamura, C., Thanavishuth, C., Burnham, D., & Luksaneeyanawin, S. (2002). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 372–92.
Kuhl, P. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 831–43.
Kuhl, P., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., … & Lacerda, F. (1997). Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science, 277(5326), 684–6.
Lam, C., & Kitamura, C. (2010). Maternal interactions with a hearing and hearing impaired twin: similarities and differences in speec input, interaction, and word production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 543–55.
Lam, C., & Kitamura, C. (2012). Mommy, speak clearly: induced hearing loss shapes vowel hyperarticulation. Developmental Science, 15(2), 212–21.
Lee, C., Kitamura, C., Burnham, D., & Todd, N. (2014). On the rhythm of infant- versus adult-directed speech in Australian English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136(1), 357–65.
Leong, V., Kalashnikova, M., Burnham, D., & Goswami, U. (2017). The temporal modulation structure of infant directed speech. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 7890.
Liu, H. M., Kuhl, P., & Tsao, F. M. (2003). An association between mothers’ speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science, 6(3), F1F10.
Ma, W., Golinkoff, R. M., Houston, D. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2011). Word learning in infant- and adult-directed speech. Language Learning and Development, 7(3), 185201.
Martin, A., Schatz, T., Versteegh, M., Miyazawa, K., Mazuka, R., Dupoux, E., & Cristia, A. (2015). Mothers speak less clearly to infants than to adults: a comprehensive test of the hyperarticualtion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 26(3), 341–7.
Mazuka, R., Igarashi, Y., Martin, A., & Utsugi, A. (2015). Infant-directed speech as a window into the dynamic nature of phonology. Laboratory Phonology, 6(3/4). doi:10.1515/lp-2015-0009.
McMurray, B., Kovack-Lesh, K. A., Goodwin, D., & McEchron, W. (2013). Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: enhancing development or an unintended consequence? Cognition, 129(2), 362–78.
Munhall, K. G., MacDonald, E. N., Byrne, S. K., & Johnsrude, I. (2009). Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 384–90.
Newman, R. S., & Hussain, I. (2006). Changes in preference for infant-directed speech in low and moderate noise in 4.5- to 13-month-olds. Infancy, 10(1), 6176.
Papoušek, M. (2007). Communication in early infancy: an arean of intersubjective learning. Infant Behaviour and Development, 30(2), 258–66.
Papoušek, M., Bornstein, M. H., Nuzzo, C., Papoušek, H., & Symmes, D. (1990). Infant responses to prototypical melodic contours in parental speech. Infant Behavior and Development, 13(4), 539–45.
Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. M. (2009). Rhythmic modification in child directed speech. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics, 12, 123–44.
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Garcia-Sierra, A., & Kuhl, P. K. (2014). Look who's talking: speech style and social context in language input to infants are linked to concurrent and future speech development. Developmental Science, 17(6), 880–91.
Ratner, N. B., & Pye, C. (1984). Higher pitch in BT is not universal: acoustic evidence from Quiche Mayan. Journal of Child Language, 11(3), 515–22.
Remick, H. L. (1976). Maternal speech to children during language acquisition. In von Raffler-Engel, W. & Lebrun, Y. (Eds.), Babytalk and infant speech (pp. 223–33). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Scherer, K. R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: a review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 143–65.
Schieffelin, B. (1979). Getting it together: an ethnographic approach to the study of the development of communicative competence. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 73102). New York: Academic Press.
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & Best, C. T. (2002). Infants’ listening preferences: baby talk or happy talk? Infancy, 3(3), 365–94.
Singh, L., Morgan, J. L., & White, K. S. (2004). Preference and processing: the role of speech affect in early spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 173–89.
Singh, L., Nestor, S., Parikh, C., & Yull, A. (2009). Influences of infant-directed speech on early word recognition. Infancy, 14(6), 654–66.
Smith, N. A., & Trainor, L. J. (2008). Infant-directed speech is modulated by infant feedback. Infancy, 13(4), 410–20.
Soderstrom, M. (2007). Beyond babytalk: re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review, 27(4), 501–32.
Song, J. Y., Demuth, K., & Morgan, J. (2010). Effects of the acoustic properties of infant-directed speech on infant word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 389400.
Soper, D. S. (2017). Post-hoc statistical power calculator for multiple regression [Software]. Retrieved from
Stern, D. N., Spieker, S., Barnett, R. K., & MacKain, K. (1983). The prosody of maternal speech: infant age and context related changes. Journal of Child Language, 10(1), 115.
Thiessen, E., Hill, E. A., & Saffran, J. R. (2005). Infant-directed speech facilitates word segmentation. Infancy, 7(1), 5371.
Trainor, L. J., Austin, C. M., & Desjardins, R. N. (2000). Is infant-directed speech prosody a result of the vocal expression of emotion? Psychological Science, 11(3), 188–95.
Trainor, L. J., & Desjardins, R. N. (2002). Pitch characteristics of infant-directed speech affect infants’ ability to discriminate vowels. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(2), 335–40.
Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech. Speech Communication, 49, 27.
Wang, Y., Seidl, A., & Cristia, A. (2015). Acoustic-phonetic differences between infant- and adult-directed speech: the role of stress and utterance position. Journal of Child Language, 42(4), 821–42.
Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2143–52.
Werker, J. F., & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: a developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning & Development, 1(2), 197234.
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7(1), 4963.
Werker, J. F., Yeung, H. H., & Yoshida, K. A. (2012). How do infants become experts at native-speech perception? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 221–6.



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed