Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

First language development: a usage-based perspective on past and current research*

  • ELENA LIEVEN (a1)

Abstract

I first outline three major developments in child language research over the past forty years: the use of computational modelling to reveal the structure of information in the input; the focus on quantifying productivity and abstraction; and developments in the explanation of systematic errors. Next, I turn to what I consider to be major outstanding issues: how the network of constructions builds up and the relationship between social and cognitive development and language learning. Finally, I briefly consider a number of other areas of importance to a psychologically realistic understanding of children's language development.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

Address for correspondence: Elena Lieven, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. e-mail: elena.lieven@manchester.ac.uk

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abbot-Smith, K. & Behrens, Heike (2006). How known constructions influence the acquisition of other constructions: the German passive and future constructions. Cognitive Science 30(6), 9951026.
Aguado-Orea, J. J. (2004). The acquisition of morpho-syntax in Spanish: implications for current theories of development. (Unpublished PhD thesis) University of Nottingham.
Alishahi, A. & Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science 32(5), 789834.
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Chang, F. & Bidgood, A. (2013). The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: word learning, morphology and verb argument structure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4, 4762.
Ambridge, B. & Rowland, C. F. (2009). Predicting children's errors with negative questions: Testing a schema-combination account. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2), 225–66.
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C. F., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006) Comparing different accounts of non-inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’ Journal of Child Language 33(3), 519–57.
Ariel, M. (in press). ‘Or’ constructions: monosemy versus polysemy. In MacWhinney, B., Malchukov, A. & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds), Competing motivations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arnon, I. & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1), 6782.
Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(41), 17284–89.
Bannard, C. & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning – the effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science 19(3), 241–8.
Bavin, E. & Stoll, S. (eds) (2013). The acquisition of ergativity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Berman, R. (1988). Word-class distinctions in developing grammars. In Levy, Y., Schlesinger, I. M. & Braine, M. D. S. (eds), Categories and processes in language acquisition 4572. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). Autism and specific language impairment: categorical distinction or continuum? Novartis Foundation Symposium 251, 213–26.
Bod, R. (2009). From exemplar to grammar: a probabilistic analogy-based model of language learning. Cognitive Science 33, 752–93.
Bowerman, M. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73101. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bowerman, M. (1990). Mapping thematic roles onto syntactic functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28, 1251–89.
Braine, M. D. S. (1976). Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41(164), 1104.
Brandt, S., Verhagen, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2011). German children's productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: testing the effects of frequency and variability. Cognitive Linguistics 22(2), 325–57.
Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K. & Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development 70(6), 1325–37.
Brown, P. (1998). Children's first verbs in Tzeltal: evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics 36(4), 713–53.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K. & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63 (4, Serial No. 255).
Chan, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Children's understanding of the agent – patient relations in the transitive construction: cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German and English. Cognitive Linguistics 20(2), 267300.
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113(2), 234–72.
Chemla, E., Mintz, T. H., Bernal, S. & Christophe, A. (2009). Categorizing words using ‘frequent frames’: what cross-linguistic analyses reveal about distributional acquisition strategies. Developmental Science 12(3), 396406.
Childers, J. B. & Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology 37(6), 739–48.
Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41, 83121.
Chomsky, N. (1980). The linguistic approach. In Piatelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.), Language and learning: the debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky, 109–17. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chouinard, M. M. & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30, 637–69.
Clark, R. (1974). Performing without competence. Journal of Child Language 1(1), 110.
Dąbrowska, E. (2005). Productivity and beyond: mastering the Polish genitive inflection. Journal of Child Language 32, 191205.
Dąbrowska, E., and Lieven, E. (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 16(3), 437–74.
Dąbrowska, E., Rowland, C. & Theakston, A. (2009). The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3), 571–97.
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2008). German children's comprehension of word order and case marking in causative sentences. Child Development 79, 1152–67.
Dittmar, M., Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2014). Familiar verbs are not always easier than novel verbs: how German pre-school children comprehend active and passive sentences. Cognitive Science 38(1), 128–51.
Erkelens, M. A. (2009). Learning to categorize verbs and nouns: studies on Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.
Fernald, A. & Marchman, V. A. (2012). Individual differences in lexical processing at 18 months predict vocabulary growth in typically-developing and late-talking toddlers. Child Development 83, 203–22.
Fernandes, K. J., Marcus, G. F., Di Nubila, J. A. & Vouloumanos, A. (2006). From semantics to syntax and back again: argument structure in the third year of life. Cognition 100(2), B1020.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Aguado-Orea, J. & Gobet, F. (2007). Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science 31(2), 311–41.
Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. & Gobet, F. (2010). Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model. Journal of Child Language 37(3), 643–99.
Gergely, G., Bekkering, H. & Király, I. (2002). Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature 415, 755.
Gerken, L. A. (2006). Decisions, decisions: infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition 98, B6774.
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C. & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science 17(8), 684–91.
Göksun, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (2010). Trading spaces: carving up events for learning language. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, 3342.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, M. & Allen, S. E. M. (2013). The effect of discourse-pragmatic features on subject omission in English. Journal of Pragmatics 56, 1531.
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11, F31–9.
Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A. & Lieven, E. (2009). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language 36(5), 1091–114.
Krajewski, G., Lieven, E. & Theakston, A. (2012). Productivity of a Polish child's inflectional noun morphology: a naturalistic study. Morphology 22(1), 934.
Krajewski, G., Theakston, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2011). How Polish children switch from one case to another when using novel nouns: challenges for models of inflectional morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 830–61.
Küntay, A. C. & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Putting interaction back into child language: examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication 6, 514.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Legate, J. A. & Yang, C. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition 14, 315–44.
Lewis, J. D. & Elman, J. L. (2001). Learnability and the statistical structure of language: poverty of stimulus arguments revisited. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 359–70. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24(1), 187219.
Lieven, E. V. M., Salomo, D. & Tomasello, M. (2009). Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: a usage-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics 20(3), 481507.
Lieven, E. & Stoll, S. (2009). Language development. In Bornstein, M. (ed.), The handbook of cross-cultural developmental science, 143–60. New York: Psychology Press.
Lizskowski, U., Carpenter, M. & Tomasello, M. (2007). Reference and attitude in infant pointing. Journal of Child Language 34,120.
MacWhinney, B. (1975). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children. Journal of Child Language 2, 6577.
MacWhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In Kuczaj, S. (ed.), Language development. Vol. 1: syntax and semantics, 73136. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk. Vol. 1: transcription format and programs. Vol. 2: the database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Miller, J. & Weinert, R. (1998/2009). Spontaneous spoken language: syntax and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mintz, T. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition 90, 1117.
Monaghan, P., Chater, N. & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). The differential contribution of phonological and distributional cues in grammatical categorization. Cognition 96, 143–82.
Naigles, L., Hoff, E. & Vear, D. (2009). Flexibility in early verb use: evidence from a multiple-n diary study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 74(2), 1143.
Noble, C. H, Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. M. (2011). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: evidence from infants and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science 35(5), 963–82.
Onishi, K. H. & Baillargeon, R. (2005). Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs? Science 308, 255–8.
Pan, B., Rowe, M., Singer, J. & Snow, C. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development 76(4), 763–82.
Parisien, C. & Stevenson, S. (2010). Learning verb alternations in a usage-based Bayesian model. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, Oregon, August, online: <http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2010/papers/0641/paper0641.pdf>.
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language 37(3), 607–42.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46, 115–54.
Pine, J. M., Freudenthal, D., Krajewski, G. & Gobet, F. (2013). Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf's law and the case of the determiner. Cognition 127(3), 345–60.
Pine, J., Rowland, C. F., Lieven, E. V. M. & Theakston, A. L. (2005). Testing the Agreement/Tense Omission Model: why the data on children's use of non-nominative subjects count against the ATOM. Journal of Child Language 32, 269–89.
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pizutto, E. & Caselli, C. (1992). The acquisition of Italian morphology: implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language 19, 491557.
Reali, F. & Christiansen, M. H. (2004). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science 29, 1007–28.
Redington, M., Chater, N. & Finch, S. (1998). Distributional information: a powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science 22(4), 425–69.
Rispoli, M. (1994). Pronoun case overextension and paradigm building. Journal of Child Language 21, 157–72.
Rowland, C. F. (2007). Explaining errors in children's questions. Cognition 104(1), 106–34.
Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. M. (2000). Subject – auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ Journal of Child Language 27(1), 157–81.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month olds. Science 274, 1926–8.
Salomo, D., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2010). Young children's sensitivity to new and given information when answering predicate-focus questions. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(1), 101–15.
Savage, C., Lieven, E., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2003). Testing the abstractness of young children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions? Developmental Science 6(5), 557–67.
Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (eds), Language acquisition: the state of the art, 128–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stoll, S., Bickel, B., Lieven, E., Banjade, G., Bhatta, T. N., Gaenszle, M., Paudyal, N. P., Pettigrew, J., Rai, I. P., Rai, M. & Rai, N. K. (2012). Nouns and verbs in Chintang: children's usage and surrounding adult speech. Journal of Child Language 39, 284321.
Street, J. & Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120, 2080–94.
Stumper, B., Bannard, C., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2011). ‘Frequent frames’ in German child-directed speech: a limited cue to grammatical categories. Cognitive Science 35, 1190–205.
Swingley, D. (2005). 11-months-olds' knowledge of how familiar words sound. Developmental Science 8, 432–43.
Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children's and adults' performance on grammaticality judgement tasks. Cognitive Development 19(1), 1534.
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V. M., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2002). Going, going, gone: the acquisition of the verb ‘go’. Journal of Child Language 29, 783811.
Theakston, A., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of input in the acquisition of third-person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 46, 863–77.
Theakston, A. L., Maslen, R., Lieven, E. V. M. & Tomasello, M. (2012). The acquisition of the active transitive construction in English: a detailed case study. Cognitive Linguistics 23(1), 91128.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello, M. & Haberl, K. (2003). Understanding attention: 12- and 18-month-olds know what's new for other persons. Developmental Psychology 39, 906–12.
Valian, V., Solt, S. & Stewart, J. (2009). Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae? The case of children's determiners. Journal of Child Language 36(4), 743–78.
Verhagen, Arie (2005). Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106(1/4), 2379.
Wijnen, F., Kempen, M. & Gillis, S. (2001). Bare infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language 28, 629–60.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

First language development: a usage-based perspective on past and current research*

  • ELENA LIEVEN (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.