Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Early verb constructions in French: adjacency on the left edge

  • EDY VENEZIANO (a1) and EVE V. CLARK (a2)

Abstract

Children acquiring French elaborate their early verb constructions by adding adjacent morphemes incrementally at the left edge of core verbs. This hypothesis was tested with 2657 verb uses from four children between 1;3 and 2;7. Consistent with the Adjacency Hypothesis, children added clitic subjects first only to present tense forms (as in il saute ‘he jumps’); modals to infinitives (as in faut sauter ‘has to jump’); and auxiliaries to past participles (as in a sauté ‘has jumped’). Only after this did the children add subjects to the left of a modal or auxiliary, as in elle veut sauter ‘she wants to jump’, or elle a sauté ‘she has jumped’. The order in which these elements were added, and the development in the frequencies of the constructions, all support the predictions of the Adjacency Hypothesis for left edge development in early verb constructions.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Addresses for correspondence: Edy Veneziano, Université Paris Descartes, Institut de Psychologie, 71 Avenue Edouard Vaillant, Office 4075, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France. e-mail: edy.veneziano@parisdescartes.fr
Eve V. Clark, Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; e-mail : eclark@stanford.edu

References

Hide All
Ågren, M. & van de Weijer, J. (2013). Input frequency and the acquisition of subject–verb agreement in number in spoken and written French. Journal of French Language Studies 23, 311–33.
Aksu-Koç, A. (1988). The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense–aspect morphology: evidence from Turkish. First Language 18, 255–80.
Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. A. (2003). The emergence of grammar: early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30, 845–77.
Ashkenazi, O. (2015). Input–output relations in the early acquisition of Hebrew verbs. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Jaime and Joan Constantiner School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
Belikova, A., Kupisch, T., Özçelik, Ö. & Sadlier-Brown, E. (2009). Fillers as functional categories: evidence from German–English bilingual acquisition. In Crawford, J., Otaki, K. & Takahashi, Masahiko (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America (GALANA 2008), 112. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Online: <www.lingref.com>, document #2301.
Bloom, L., Lifter, K. & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language 56, 386412.
Bowerman, M. (1973). Structural relations in children's utterances: syntactic or semantic? In Moore, T. E. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 197213. New York: Academic Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1992). Current morphology. London: Routledge.
Chouinard, M. M. & Clark, E. V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language 30, 637–69.
Christensen, L. (2010). Early verbs in child Swedish – a diary study on two boys. Nordlund 30, Småskrifter från Nordiska språk, University of Lund.
Clark, E. V. (1987). The principle of contrast: a constraint on language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 133. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, E. V. (1990). The pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417–31.
Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. V. & Bernicot, J. (2008). Repetition as ratification: how parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language 35, 349–71.
Clark, E. V. & de Marneffe, M.-C. (2012). Constructing verb paradigms in French: adult construals and emerging grammatical contrasts. Morphology 22, 89120.
Culbertson, J. & Legendre, G. (2008). Qu'en est-il des clitiques sujet en français oral contemporain? In Durand, J., Habert, B. & Laks, B. (eds), Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2651–62. Paris: EDP Sciences.
Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A. & Gilligan, G. (1985). The suffixing preference: a processing explanation. Linguistics 23, 723–58.
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children's production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language 35, 99127.
de Villiers, J. G. (1985). Learning how to use verbs: lexical coding and the influence of the input. Journal of Child Language 12, 587–95.
Diesendruck, G. & Markson, L. (2001). Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: a pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology 27, 630–41.
van Dijk, M. & van Geert, P. (2005). Disentangling behavior in early child development: interpretability of early child language and its effect on utterance length measures. Infant Behavior and Development 28, 99117.
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M., Gargarina, N., Pestal, L. & Pöchtrager, M. (2006). On the typology of inflection class systems. Folia Linguistica 40, 5174.
Dye, C. (2011). Reduced auxiliaries in early child language: converging observational and experimental evidence from French. Journal of Linguistics 47, 301–39.
Ellis, N. C. & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned attention in adult language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 589624.
Estigarribia, B. (2010). Facilitation by variation: right-to-left learning of English yes/no questions. Cognitive Science 34(1), 6893.
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastián, E. & Soto, P. (1999). The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3, 133–82.
Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S. & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 38, 515–31.
Grevisse, M. & Goosse, A. (2008). Le Bon Usage: Grammaire Française, 14th ed. Bruxelles: De Boeck, Duculot.
Harner, L. (1980). Comprehension of past and future reference revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 29, 170–82.
Hickey, T. (1991). Mean length of utterance and the acquisition of Irish. Journal of Child Language 18, 553–69.
Hirsh-Pasek, K. & Golinkoff, R. M. (1999). The origins of grammar: evidence from early language comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Höhle, B. & Weissenborn, J. (2003). German-learning infants’ ability to detect unstressed closed-class elements in continuous speech. Developmental Science 6, 122–7.
Hupp, J. M., Sloutsky, V. M. & Culicover, P. W. (2009). Evidence for a domain-general mechanism underlying the suffixation preference in language. Language and Cognitive Processes 24, 876909.
Jordens, P. (2002). Finiteness in early child Dutch. Linguistics 40, 687765.
Kilani-Schoch, M. (2000). Early verb development in two French-speaking children. Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 18, 7997.
Klein, W. (2012). The information structure of French. In Krifka, M. & Musan, R. (eds), The expression of information structure, 94125. Berlin: Mouton.
Küntay, A. & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Putting interaction back into child language: examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication 6, 514.
Leeman-Bouix, D. (2005). Grammaire du Verbe Français: Des Formes aux Sens––Modes, Aspects, Temps, Auxiliaires. Paris: A. Colin.
Le Goffic, P. (1997). Les Formes Conjuguées du Verbe Français. Paris: Ophrys.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analyzing talk, 2 vols., 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Miller, P. & Monachesi, P. (2003). Les pronoms clitiques dans les langues romanes. In Godard, D. (ed.), Les Langues Romanes : Problèmes de la Phase Simple, 67123. Paris: CNRS.
Mithun, M. (1989). The acquisition of polysynthesis. Journal of Child Language 16, 285312.
Naigles, L. R. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1995). Input to verb learning: evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping. Developmental Psychology 31, 827–37.
Naigles, L. R. & Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1998). Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use. Journal of Child Language 25, 95120.
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L. & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. Année Psychologique 101, 447–62.
Parker, M. D. & Brorson, K. (2005). A comparative study between mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUm) and mean length of utterance in words (MLUw). First Language 25, 365–76.
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L. (1993). False starts and filler-syllables: ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69, 742–77.
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. (1994). The acquisition of Italian verb morphology: in a cross- linguistic perspective. In Levy, Y. (ed.), Other children, other languages: issues in the theory of language acquisition 137–87. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pye, C. (1983). Mayan telegraphese: intonational units in the development of Quiché Mayan. Language 59, 583604.
Richards, B. J. & Robinson, W. P. (1993). Environmental correlates of child copula verb growth. Journal of Child Language 20, 343–62.
Rojas-Nieto, C. (2011). Developing first contrasts in Spanish verb inflection: usage and interaction. In Arnon, I. & Clark, E. V. (eds), Experience, variation, and generalization: learning a first language, 5372. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rowland, C. F. & Fletcher, S. L. (2006). The effect of sampling on estimates of lexical specificity and error rates. Journal of Child Language 33, 859–77.
Salazar Orvig, A., Marcos, H., Morgenstern, A., Hassan, R., Leber-Marin, J. & Parès, J. (2010). Dialogical factors in toddlers’ use of clitic pronouns. First Language 30, 375402.
Shady, M. & Gerken, L. A. (1999). Grammatical and caregiver cues in early sentence comprehension. Journal of Child Language 26, 163–75.
Shipley, E. F., Smith, C. S. & Gleitman, L. R. (1969). A study in the acquisition of language: free responses to commands. Language 45, 322–42.
Slobin, D. I. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development, 175208. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 2, 1157–256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Soderstrom, M., White, K. S., Conwell, E. & Morgan, J. L. (2007). Receptive grammatical knowledge of familiar content words and inflection in 16-month-olds. Infancy 12, 129.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: a case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children's spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31, 101–21.
Valian, V. (2006). Young children's understanding of present and past tense. Language Learning and Development 2, 251–76.
Veneziano, E. (1988). Vocal–verbal interaction and the construction of early lexical knowledge. In Smith, M. D. & Locke, J. L. (eds), The emergent lexicon: the child's development of a linguistic vocabulary, 109–47. New York: Academic Press.
Veneziano, E. (1999). Early lexical, morphological and syntactic development in French: some complex relations. International Journal of Bilingualism 3, 183217.
Veneziano, E. (2003). The emergence of noun and verb categories in the acquisition of French. Psychology of Language and Communication 7, 2336.
Veneziano, E. (2005). Effects of conversational functioning on early language acquisition: when both caregivers and children matter. In Bokus, B. (ed.), Studies in the psychology of child language: essays in honor of Grace Wales Shugar, 4769. Warsaw: Matrix.
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C. (2010). The acquisition of early verbs in French: assessing the role of conversation and of child-directed input. First Language 30, 287311.
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. (2000). The changing status of ‘filler syllables’ on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27, 461500.
Veneziano, E., Sinclair, H. & Berthoud, I. (1990). From one word to two words: repetition patterns on the way to structured speech. Journal of Child Language 17, 633650.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed