Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:09:22.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A discourse analysis of deixis: pragmatic, cognitive and semantic factors in the comprehension of ‘this’, ‘that’, ‘here’ and ‘there’*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Leda Verdiani Tfouni
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Roberta L. Klatzky
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara

Abstract

Children (mean age 3; 6) were tested as to the comprehension of the deictic words this, that, here and there in two conditions: as hearers–addressees and as hearers–spectators. It was hypothesized that comprehension of these words depends on the role the comprehender plays in the conversation, and that a spectator's role is more difficult than an addressee's. Comprehension in a pragmatic condition (with a pointing gesture accompanying the utterance) was contrasted with a semantic condition (without gesture), and the prediction was that the pragmatic use of the words would facilitate comprehension. It was also theorized that this and here are marked, whereas that and there are unmarked. Therefore, it was predicted that this and here would be more difficult to comprehend than that and there. All the initial predictions were confirmed by the analysis of variance. The results are discussed within recent theories of pragmatics, semantics and cognitive development.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[*]

The first author is currently teaching at UNAERP, in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, and is a Ph.D. student at the Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem, at the Universidade de Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Address for correspondence: Roberta L. Klatzky, Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.

References

REFERENCES

Antinucci, F. (1977). Sulla deissi. Rome: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute de Psicologia.Google Scholar
Bates, E. (1976). Language and context. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, L., Rocissano, L. & Hood, L. (1976). Adult-child discourse: developmental interaction between information processing and linguistic knowledge. CogPsych 8. 521–52.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1975). From communication to language – a psychological perspective. Cognition 3. 255–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, R. (1979). The comprehension of ‘here’ and ‘there’. JChLang 6. 6980.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1971). On the acquisition of the meaning of ‘before’ and ‘after’. JVLVB 10. 266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Garnica, O. K. (1974). Is he coming or going? On the acquisition of deictic verbs. JVLVB 13. 556–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Sengul, C. J. (1978). Strategies in the acquisition of deixis. JChLang 5. 457–75.Google Scholar
De Villiers, P. A. & De Villiers, J. G. (1974). On this, that and the other: nonegocentrism in very young children. JExpPsych 18. 438–47.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. & Balfour, G. (1968). Less is more: a study of language comprehension in children. BJPsych 59. 461–72.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1975). Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistic Club.Google Scholar
Klatzky, R. L., Clark, E. V. & Macken, M. (1973). Asymmetries in the acquisition of polar adjectives: linguistic or conceptual? JExpChPsych 16. 3246.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Van Der Geest, T. (1975). Some aspects of communicative competence and their implications for language acquisition. Amsterdam: van Gorcum.Google Scholar