Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Data and beyond*

  • PAUL FLETCHER (a1)

Abstract

Perusing early issues of this Journal from nearly forty years ago, we find many topics on the contents lists that could appear in a current issue. But the resources available to contributors for addressing questions of interest have changed dramatically, not least in the public availability of data. Here we look briefly at two assets which have accrued to the field in the intervening decades, and at the contributions they make. CHILDES provides a level playing field on which debates about the import of language sample data, especially longitudinal data, can be played out. The MBCDI and its offspring encourage the collection of data from large samples of individuals and so promote the exploration of factors that may explain individual differences. Both have been major contributions to the field.

Copyright

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

Address for correspondence: Paul Fletcher, Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University College Cork, Brookfield Health Sciences Centre, College Road, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: p.fletcher@ucc.ie

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ambridge, B., Rowland, C., Theakston, A. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What can experimental data tell us?’ Journal of Child Language 33, 519–57.
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. & Basbøll, H. (2008). Early vocabulary development in Danish and other languages: a CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language 35, 619–50.
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D. J., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2007). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
Fey, M. & Finestack, L. (2009). Research and development in child language intervention: a five-phase model. In Schwartz, R. G. (ed.), Handbook of child language disorders, 513–31. New York/Hove: Psychology Press.
Fey, M. & Loeb, D. F. (2002). An evaluation of the facilitative effects of yes-no questions on the acquisition of auxiliary verbs. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 160–74.
Fletcher, P. (1985). A child's learning of English. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: the nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 513–43.
Jørgensen, R. N., Dale, P., Bleses, D. & Fenson, L. (2010). CLEX: a cross-linguistic lexical norms database. Journal of Child Language 37, 419–28.
Klee, T. & Harrison, C. (2001). CDI Words and Sentences: validity and preliminary norms for British English. Paper presented at Child Language Seminar, University of Hertfordshire, July.
Kristoffersen, K., Simonsen, H. G., Bleses, D., Wehberg, S., Jørgensen, R. N., Eiesland, E. & Henriksen, L. (2013). The use of the Internet in collecting CDI data – an example from Norway. Journal of Child Language 40, 567–85.
Labov, W. & Labov, T. (1978). Learning the syntax of questions. In Campbell, R. & Smith, P. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language: language development and mother–child interaction, 144. London/New York: Plenum Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacWhinney, B. (2013). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 1: the CHAT transcription format. Online: <http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/chat.pdf> (last accessed 17 January 2014).
MacWhinney, B. (2014). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 2: the CLAN programs. Online: <http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/clan.pdf> (last accessed 17 January 2014).
O'Toole, C. & Fletcher, P. (2010). Validity of a parent report instrument for Irish-speaking toddlers. First Language 30, 199217.
Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. (2000). Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What do children know?’ Journal of Child Language 27, 157–81.
Rowland, C. F. & Theakston, A. L. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 2: the modals and auxiliary DO. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1471–92.
Stokes, S. (2010). Neighbourhood density and word frequency in toddlers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53, 670–83.
Stokes, S., Kern, S. & Dos Santos, C. (2012). Extended statistical learning as an account for slow vocabulary growth. Journal of Child Language 39, 105–29.
Stokes, S. & Klee, T. (2009). Factors that influence vocabulary development in two-year-old children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50, 498505.
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W.-L. & Kaciroti, N. (2009). Early vocabulary development in Mandarin (Putonghua) and Cantonese. Journal of Child Language 36, 1115–44.
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Zhang, Z. X. & Liang, W.-L. (2008). Chinese Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and manual. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press.
Theakston, A. L. & Rowland, C. F. (2009). The acquisition of auxiliary syntax: a longitudinal elicitation study. Part 1: auxiliary BE. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1449–70.
Wells, C. G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westergaard, M. (2009). Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36, 1023–51.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Data and beyond*

  • PAUL FLETCHER (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.