Akhtar, N. & Tomasello, M. (1997). Young children's productivity with word order and verb morphology. Developmental Psychology
Alishahi, A. & Stevenson, S. (2008). A computational model of early argument structure acquisition. Cognitive Science
Ambridge, B. (2013). How do children restrict their linguistic generalizations? An (un-)grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Science
Ambridge, B., Bidgood, A., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. & Freudenthal, D. (in press). Is passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from adult grammaticality judgment and comprehension studies. Cognitive Science.
Ambridge, B. & Brandt, S. (2013). ‘Lisa filled water into the cup’: the roles of entrenchment, pre-emption and verb semantics in German speakers’ L2 acquisition of English locatives. Zeitschrift fur Anglistik und Amerikanistik
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. (2011). Child language acquisition: contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. (2015). A Constructivist account. In MacWhinney, B. & O'Grady, W. (eds), Handbook of language emergence, 478–510. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2011). Children use verb semantics to retreat from overgeneralization errors: a novel verb grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Linguistics
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2012a). Semantics versus statistics in the retreat from locative overgeneralization errors. Cognition
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. & Chang, F. (2012b). The roles of verb semantics, entrenchment and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument structure overgeneralization errors. Language
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Chang, F. & Bidgood, A. (2013). The retreat from overgeneralization in child language acquisition: word learning, morphology and verb argument structure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M, Rowland, C. F., Freudenthal, D. & Chang, F. (2014). Avoiding dative overgeneralization errors: semantics, statistics or both?
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., Jones, R. L & Clark, V. (2009). A semantics-based approach to the ‘no negative-evidence’ problem. Cognitive Science
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F. & Young, C. R. (2008) The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children's and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition
Bidgood, A., Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F. (2014). The retreat from locative overgeneralisation errors: a novel verb grammaticality judgment study. PLoS ONE.
Blything, R. P.
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M. (2014). Children use statistics and semantics in the retreat from overgeneralization. PLoS ONE.
Bowerman, M. (1988). The ‘no negative evidence’ problem: How do children avoid constructing an overly general grammar? In Hawkins, J. A. (ed.), Explaining language universals, 73–101. Oxford: Blackwell.
Boyd, J. K. & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Learning what not to say: the role of statistical preemption and categorization in a-adjective production. Language
Braine, M. D. S. (1971). On two types of models of the internalization of grammars. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar: a theoretical symposium (pp. 153–186).New York: Academic Press.
Braine, M. D. S. & Brooks, P. J. (1995). Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar. In Tomasello, M. & Merriman, W. E. (eds), Beyond names for things: young children's acquisition of verbs (pp. 352–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T. V. & Baayen, H. R. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In Boume, G., Kramer, I. & Zwarts, J. (eds), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
Brooks, P. J. & Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument-structure constructions. Language
Brooks, P. J., Tomasello, M., Dodson, K. & Lewis, L. B. (1999). Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs. Child Development
Brooks, P. J. & Zizak, O. (2002). Does preemption help children learn verb transitivity?
Journal of Child Language
Bybee, J. L. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representation. In Hoffman, Thomas, Trousdale, T. & G. (eds), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chang, F. (2002). Symbolically speaking: a connectionist model of sentence production. Cognitive Science
Chang, F., Dell, G. S. & Bock, K. (2006). Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Dowman, M. (2000). Addressing the learnability of verb subcategorizations with Bayesian inference. In Gleitman, L. R. & Joshi, A. K. (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 107–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dowman, M. (submitted). Minimum description length as a solution to the problem of generalization in syntactic theory. Machine Learning and Language.
Gertner, Y., Fisher, C. & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science
Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition
Gleitman, L. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption. Cognitive Linguistics
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. & Goldberg, R. (1991a). Affectedness and direct objects: the role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure. Cognition
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M. & Goldberg, R. (1991b). Syntax and semantics in the acquisition of locative verbs. Journal of Child Language
Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language
Hsu, A. S. & Chater, N. (2010). The logical problem of language acquisition: a probabilistic perspective. Cognitive Science
Hsu, A. S., Chater, N. & Vitányi, P. (2011). The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition
Hsu, A. S., Chater, N. & Vitányi, P. (2013). Language learning from positive evidence, reconsidered: a simplicity-based approach. Topics in Cognitive Science
Langacker, R. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In Barlow, M. & Kemmer, S. (eds), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MacWhinney, B. (2004). A multiple process solution to the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language
Noble, C. H., Rowland, C. F. & Pine, J. M. (2011). Comprehension of argument structure and semantic roles: evidence from English-learning children and the forced-choice pointing paradigm. Cognitive Science
Onnis, L., Roberts, M. & Chater, N. (2002). Simplicity: a cure for overgeneralizations in language acquisition? In Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 720–725). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perek, F. & Goldberg, A. E. (2015). Generalizing beyond the input: the functions of the constructions matter. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 108–127.
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language
Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pinker, S. (1994). How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics?
Ruh, N. & Westermann, G. (2009). OXlearn: a new MATLAB-based simulation tool for connectionist models. Behavior Research Methods
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L. & PDP Research Group (1988). Parallel distributed processing, Vol. 1 (pp. 354–362). IEEE.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2008). Negative evidence and preemption: a constructional approach to ungrammaticality. Cognitive Linguistics
Theakston, A. L. (2004). The role of entrenchment in children's and adults’ performance on grammaticality judgement tasks. Cognitive Development
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Twomey, K. E., Chang, F. & Ambridge, B. (2014). Do as I say, not as I do: a lexical distributional account of English locative verb class acquisition. Cognitive Psychology
Wonnacott, E., Newport, E. L. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Acquiring and processing verb argument structure: distributional learning in a miniature language. Cognitive Psychology