Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

But: Do age and working memory influence conventional implicature processing?*

  • LEEN JANSSENS (a1), STEPHANIE DROOGHMANS (a1) and WALTER SCHAEKEN (a1)

Abstract

Conventional implicatures are omnipresent in daily life communication but experimental research on this topic is sparse, especially research with children. The aim of this study was to investigate if eight- to twelve-year-old children spontaneously make the conventional implicature induced by but, so, and nevertheless in ‘p but q’ sentences. Additionally, the study aimed to shed light on the cognitive effort required for these inferences by measuring working memory (WM) capacity. Our results show that children do make these inferences to a certain extent, but are sensitive to the content of the arguments. We found a significant effect of sentence type, but did not observe any developmental effect, nor any effect of WM: a higher age or WM capacity does not result in more pragmatic inferences.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Leen Janssens, Tiensestraat 102 ( Postbox 3711, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. tel: 0032 16 325873; fax: 0032 16 326099; e-mail: Leen.Janssens@ppw.kuleuven.be

Footnotes

Hide All
[*]

We would like to thank the two schools, ‘De Klimboom’ and ‘GVBS Klavertje 4’, for allowing us to perform our experiment. We would also like to thank Pieter Moors for his help with the analyses. This research was carried out with the financial support of the National Council for Scientific Research – Flanders, Belgium (FWO grant G.0634.09).

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Anscombre, J. & Ducrot, O. (1977). Deux ‘mais’ en français? Lingua 43, 2340.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390412.
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes, R package version 0.999375-42, online: <http://www.R-project.org/>.
Blakemore, D. (2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning: the semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bott, L. & Noveck, I. A. (2004). Some utterances are underinformative: the onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51, 437457.
Braine, M. & Rumain, B. (1981). Development of comprehension of ‘or’: evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31, 4670.
Daneman, M. & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 450466.
De Neys, W. & Schaeken, W. (2007). When people are more logical under cognitive load: dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology 54, 128133.
Dieussaert, K., Verkerk, S., Gillard, E. & Schaeken, W. (2011). Some effort for some: further evidence that scalar implicatures are effortful. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 64, 23522367.
Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 410419.
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., de Rooij, J. & van den Toorn, M. C. (1997). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen & Leuven: Wolters Noordhoff.
Hall, A. (2004). The meaning of but: a procedural reanalysis. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16, 199236.
Horn, L. R. (2004). Implicature. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (eds), The handbook of pragmatics, 328. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical Data Analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434446.
Janssens, L. & Schaeken, W. (2012). The role of task characteristics in children's scalar implicature production. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cogsci, 509514, Sapporo, Japan.
Janssens, L. & Schaeken, W. (2013). ‘But’ how do we reason with it: an experimental investigation of the implicature stemming from ‘but’. Journal of Pragmatics 57, 194209.
Lepère, J. (2008). Het gebruik van ‘maar’ en ‘toch’ bij negenjarige kinderen. Eenexperimenteelonderzoek. Unpublished master's thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of Arts, Department of Linguistics.
Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78, 165188.
Noveck, I. A. & Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: an evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85, 203210.
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface. Cognition 86, 253282.
Schaeken, W., Sevenants, A. & Madruga, J. (2011). The dramatic effect of content on children's ‘unless’ reasoning: pragmatic modulation or reconstruction?Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 11701175, Cogsci, Boston, US.
Van Belle, W. (2003). Zwijgen is niet altijd toestemmen: De rol van inferenties bij het interpreteren en argumenteren. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco.
Van Belle, W. & Devroy, G. (1992). Tegenstellende en toegevende connectoren. Eenargumentatievebeschrijving (Preprint 143, voorlopigepublicatie). Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of Arts, Department of Linguistics.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

But: Do age and working memory influence conventional implicature processing?*

  • LEEN JANSSENS (a1), STEPHANIE DROOGHMANS (a1) and WALTER SCHAEKEN (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.