Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-559fc8cf4f-d5zgf Total loading time: 0.312 Render date: 2021-03-02T15:01:15.610Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2009

VIRGINIA A. MARCHMAN
Affiliation:
Stanford University
ANNE FERNALD
Affiliation:
Stanford University
NEREYDA HURTADO
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Research using online comprehension measures with monolingual children shows that speed and accuracy of spoken word recognition are correlated with lexical development. Here we examined speech processing efficiency in relation to vocabulary development in bilingual children learning both Spanish and English (n=26 ; 2 ; 6). Between-language associations were weak: vocabulary size in Spanish was uncorrelated with vocabulary in English, and children's facility in online comprehension in Spanish was unrelated to their facility in English. Instead, efficiency of online processing in one language was significantly related to vocabulary size in that language, after controlling for processing speed and vocabulary size in the other language. These links between efficiency of lexical access and vocabulary knowledge in bilinguals parallel those previously reported for Spanish and English monolinguals, suggesting that children's ability to abstract information from the input in building a working lexicon relates fundamentally to mechanisms underlying the construction of language.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

[*]

We are grateful to the children and parents who participated in this research, and to the staff of the Ravenswood Clinic, the East Palo Alto Library, East Palo Alto Head Start, and Family Connections of San Mateo County. Special thanks to Theres Grüter, Adriana Weisleder, Lucía Rodríguez Mata, Ana Luz Portillo, Amber MacMillan, Renate Zangl, Nati Rodríguez, Guadalupe Makasyuk, Julissa Collado, Rebecca Wedel, Gladys Ayora, Kimberly Rodríguez, Marcela Hernández, Ana María Sanchez, Yessica Hernández, Sara Hernández, Daisy Ríos and the staff of the Center for Infant Studies at Stanford University. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health to Anne Fernald (HD 42235, DC 008838) with a Postdoctoral Research Supplement for Underrepresented Minorities to Nereyda Hurtado.

References

Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., García, M. & Cortez, C. (2005). Conceptual versus monolingual scoring: When does it make a difference? Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools 36, 188200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benasich, A. A. & Tallal, P. (2002). Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behavioural Brain Research 136(1), 3149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, D. V. M., Adams, C. V. & Norbury, C. F. (2004). Using nonword repetition to distinguish genetic and environmental influences on early literacy development: A study of 6-year-old twins. American Journal of Medical Genetics 129B, 9496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E. & Tomasello, M. (2003). A construction based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27(6), 843–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobo-Lewis, A. B., Eilers, R. E., Pearson, B. Z. & Umbel, V. C. (2002). Interdependence of Spanish and English knowledge in language and literacy among bilingual children. In Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R. E. (eds), Language and Literacy in Bilingual Children, 118–32. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Conboy, B. T. & Mills, D. L. (2005). Two languages, one developing brain: event-related potentials to words in bilingual toddlers. Developmental Science 9(1), F1F12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conboy, B. T. & Thal, D. J. (2006). Ties between the lexicon and grammar: Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of bilingual toddlers. Child Development 77(3), 712–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, P. S. and Fenson, L. (1996). Lexical development norms for young children. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 28, 125–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dapretto, M. & Bjork, E. L. (2000). The development of word retrieval abilities in the second year and its relation to early vocabulary growth. Child Development 71, 635–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Houwer, A. (2007). Parental language input patterns and children's bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 411–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, C. T., Byers-Heinlein, K. & Werker, J. F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development 78, 1510–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenson, L., Marchman, V. A., Thal, D., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S. & Bates, E. (2006). MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User's Guide and Technical Manual, 2nd edn.Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (2009). Developing efficiency in understanding spoken language: How infants learn to listen for meaning. Invited address at the Symposium for Research in Child Language Disorders (SRCLD). Madison, WI (June 2009).Google Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A. & Marchman, V. A. (2006). Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year. Developmental Psychology 42, 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Pinto, J. P., Swingley, D., Weinberg, A. & McRoberts, G. W. (1998). Rapid gains in speed of verbal processing by infants in the second year. Psychological Science 9, 7275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Zangl, R., Portillo, A. L. & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Looking while listening: Using eye movements to monitor spoken language comprehension by infants and young children. In Sekerina, I., Fernández, E. M. & Clahsen, H. (eds), Developmental psycholinguistics: On-line methods in children's language processing, 97–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Non-word repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 513–43.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. & Nicoladis, E. (2007). Bilingual first language acquisition. In Hoff, E. & Shatz, M. (eds), Blackwell handbook of language development, 324–42. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Hahn, E. (2007). Fast mapping skills in the developing lexicon. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 50, 682–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf Estes, K., Evans, J., Alibali, M. & Saffran, J. (2007). Can infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and word learning. Psychological Science 18(3), 254–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review 26, 5588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2007). Spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language. Journal of Child Language 33, 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11(6), F31F39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J., Haight, W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T. (1991). Vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27, 236–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson-Maldonado, D., Thal, D. J., Marchman, V. A., Newton, T., Fenson, L. & Conboy, B. (2003). MacArthur Inventarios del Desarrollo de Habilidades Comunicativas: User's Guide and Technical Manual. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. (2004). Scoring program for the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories, www.sci.sdsu.edu/cdi/scoringdb_p.htm.Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008). Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science 11, F9–F16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2009). Linking early efficiency in spoken language understanding to typical and atypical outcomes in preschool. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Denver, CO (April 2009).Google Scholar
Marchman, V. A. & Martínez-Sussmann, C. (2002). Concurrent validity of caregiver/parent report measures of language for children who are learning both English and Spanish. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 45(5), 993–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchman, V. A., Martínez-Sussmann, C. & Dale, P. S. (2004). The language-specific nature of grammatical development: Evidence from bilingual language learners. Developmental Science 7, 212–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattock, K., Polka, L., Rvachew, S. & Krehm, M. (in press). The first steps in word learning are easier when the shoes fit: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
McCardle, P. & Hoff, E. (2004) (eds). Childhood bilingualism: Research on infancy through school age. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.Google Scholar
Metsala, J. L. & Walley, A. C. (1998). Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability. In Metsala, J. L. & Ehri, L. C. (eds), Word recognition in beginning literacy, 89–120. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mintz, T. H., Newport, E. L. & Bever, T. G. (2002). The distributional structure of grammatical categories in speech to young children. Cognitive Science 26, 393424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyle, M. J., Ellis Weismer, S., Evans, J. L. & Lindstrom, M. J. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 508–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradis, J., Nicoladis, E. & Genesee, F. (2000). Early emergence of structural constraints on code-mixing: Evidence from French–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition 3(3), 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, J. & Pearson, B. Z. (2004). Bilingual lexical development: Influences, contexts and processes. In Goldstein, B. A. (ed.), Bilingual language development and disorders in Spanish–English speakers, 77–104. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. & Fernández, S. C. (1994). Patterns of interaction in the lexical growth in two languages of bilingual infants and toddlers. Language Learning 44, 617–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., Lewedeg, V. & Oller, D. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics 18, 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C. & Oller, D. K. (1993). Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers: Comparison to monolingual norms. Language Learning 43, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N. & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274, 1926–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. B. & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word–referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition 106(3), 1558–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Storkel, H. L. (2002). Restructuring of similarity neighbourhoods in the developing mental lexicon. Journal of Child Language 29, 251–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsao, F., Liu, H. & Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Speech perception in infancy predicts language development in the second year of life: a longitudinal study. Child Development 75, 1067–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werker, J. F. & Byers-Heinlein, K. (2008). Bilingualism in infancy: first steps in perception and comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science 12(4), 144–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 52
Total number of PDF views: 658 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd March 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

How vocabulary size in two languages relates to efficiency in spoken word recognition by young Spanish–English bilinguals*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *