Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-ndjvl Total loading time: 0.414 Render date: 2022-05-20T21:43:17.961Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Barbara Zurer Pearson*
Affiliation:
University of Miami
*
Department of English, University of Miami, Box 248145, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA.

Abstract

Comprehension of metaphor in preschoolers was studied through an elicited repetition task. Subjects were 52 children aged 3;0 to 5;2. Repetition performance on metaphors was compared to repetitions of semantically well-formed literal sentences as well as semantically anomalous sentences, all matched for length, vocabulary and sentence structure. Accuracy on literal and metaphoric stimuli was comparable, and both were significantly better than performance on anomalous sentences. There were no effects for age or sex. It was shown that the metaphors were not semantically anomalous to the children and that they were processed on a par with literal language. The argument is advanced from a review of the literature that imitation implicates understanding of the material imitated. If metaphor is thus shown to emerge early in the child's linguistic repertory, figurative language, it may be argued, occupies a more central position in linguistic theory than it has been accorded.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by grants from the US Department of Education National Graduate Fellows Program and from the National Council of Teachers of English. I wish to thank Kim Oller and Virginia Gathercole for their valuable suggestions and encouragement.

References

Asch, S. & Nerlove, H. (1960). The development of double function terms in children. In Kaplan, B. and Wapner, S. (eds), Perspectives in psychological theory. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Billow, R. M. (1975). Cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology 11. 415–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billow, R. M. (1981). Observing spontaneous metaphor in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31. 430–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L., Hood, L. & Lightbown, P. (1974). Imitation in language development; if, when and why. Cognitive Psychology 6. 380420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (1973). A first language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Fraser, C. (1963). The acquisition of syntax. In Cofer, C. & Musgrave, B. (eds), Verbal behavior and learning: problems and processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Carlson, P. & Anisfeld, M. (1969). Some observations on the linguistic competence of a twoyear-old child. Child Development 40. 569–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971). Word frequency book. New York: American Heritage.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chukovsky, K. (1963). From two to five. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cometa, M. S. & Eson, M. E. (1978). Logical operations and metaphor interpretation: a Piagetian model. Child Development 49. 649–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eilers, R. (1975). Suprasegmental and grammatical control over telegraphic speech in young children. Journal of Pyscholinguistic Research 4. 227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, S. (1964). Imitation and structural change in children's language. In Lenneberg, E. (ed.), New directions in the study of language. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, C., Bellugi, U., & Brown, R. (1963). Control of grammar in imitation, comprehension, and production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2. 121–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallimore, R. & Tharp, R. (1981). The interpretation of elirefd sentence imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning 31. 369–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, H., Kircher, M., Winner, E. & Perkins, D. (1975). Children's metaphoric productions and preferences. Child Language 2. 125–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. (1977). Children's performances on a spatial analogies task. Child Development 48. 1034–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. G. (1982). The development of the use and comprehension of metaphor by preschool children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M.Google Scholar
Hood, L. & Schierlelin, B. (1978). Elirefd imitation in two cultural contexts. San Diego Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition Quarterly Newsletter 2. 412.Google Scholar
Horgan, D. (1981). Learning to tell jokes: a case study of metalinguistic abilities. Journal of Child Language 8. 217–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, J. & Nelson, K. (1984). Play with language: overextensions as analogies. Journal of Child Language 11. 337–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C. (1985). The emergence of present perfect verb forms: semantic influences on selective imitation. Journal of Child Language 12. 325–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamitomo, G. H. & Ruder, K. F. (1976). Young children's spontaneous imitations of wellformed and anomalous commands. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Katz, J. & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language 39. 170210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, J. & Dale, P. (1973). Spontaneous imitation and free speech: a developmental comparison. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kogan, N. & Chadrow, M. (1986). Children's comprehension of metaphor in the pictorial and verbal modality. International Journal of Behavioral Development 9. 285–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. & Maratsos, M. (1975). What children can say before they will. Merrill Palmer Quarterly 21. 89111.Google Scholar
Lackner, J. R. (1968). A developmental study of language behavior in retarded children. Neuropsychologia 6. 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, J. M. & Parker-Robinson, C. (1972). Children's imitation of grammatical and ungrammatical sentences. Child Development 43. 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, L. E. & Miller, G. (1964). The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorization of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 3. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, E., Robinson, S., Gardner, H. & Winner, E. (1984). Are preschoolers' renamings intentional category violations? Developmental Psychology 20. 187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menyuk, P. (1963). A preliminary evaluation of grammatical capacity in children. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2. 429–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. & Isard, S. (1963). Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rules. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 2. 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1973). Sentence imitation in preschool children. Language and Speech 16. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moerk, E. L. (1977). Processes and products of imitation: additional evidence that imitation is progressive. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 6. 187202.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. Z. (1987). Review of elirefd repetition experiments. Unpubhshed manuscript, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Plays, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Prutting, C. A., Gallagher, T. M. & Mulac, A. (1976). The expressive portion of the NSST compared to a spontaneous language sample. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 40. 40–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyna, V. F. (1985). Figure and fantasy in children's language. In Pressley, M. & Brainerd, C. (eds), Cognitive learning and memory in children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scholes, R. J. (1969). The role of grammatically in the imitation of word strings by children and adults. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 8. 225–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, R. J. (1970). On functors and contentives in children's imitations of word strings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9. 167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siltanen, S. A. (1981). Apple noses and popsicle toeses: a developmental investigation of metaphorical comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Welsh, C. A. (1973). Elirefd imitation as a research tool in developmental linguistics. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, C. (1973). An experimental approach to children's linguistic competence. In Ferguson, C. A. & Slobin, D. I. (eds), Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Smith, J. W. A. (1976). Children's comprehension of metaphor: a Piagetian interpretation. Language and Speech 19. 236–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snow, C. (1981). The uses of imitation. Journal of Child Language 8. 205–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verbrugge, R. (1979). The primacy of metaphor in development. New Directions for Child Development 6. 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development 54. 154–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E. & Wilson, P. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child's understanding of metaphorical language. Child Development 55. 15881606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waggoner, J. E., Messe, M. J. & Palermo, D. S. (1985). Grasping the meaning of metaphor: story recall and comprehension. Child Development 56. 1156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: the emergence of metaphoric language. Journal of Child Language 6. 469–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winner, E., McCarthy, M. & Gardner, H. (1980). The ontogenesis of metaphor. In Honeck, R. P. & Hoffman, R. R. (eds), Cognition and figurative language. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
31
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The comprehension of metaphor by preschool children*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *