Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:41:15.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictor: The First Home Pregnancy Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

Jesse Olszynko-Gryn Open the ORCID record for Jesse Olszynko-Gryn [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay uses Predictor, the first home pregnancy test, to reexamine the doctor-patient relationship in Britain in the 1960s and 1970s, a tumultuous period associated with permissiveness, women's liberation, and the erosion of medical authority. It shows how the rise of self-testing contributed to a realignment of the power dynamics among women, doctors, and pharmacists. It argues that the humble home pregnancy test kit merits a place—alongside the birth control pill and abortion law reform—in histories of health consumerism and reproductive choice in the twentieth century.

Type
Original Manuscript
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 638 - 642
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The North American Conference on British Studies, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 All above quotations are from the insert of a 1971 test kit. Courtesy of Meg Crane.

2 Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse, “The Demand for Pregnancy Testing: The Aschheim-Zondek Reaction, Diagnostic Versatility, and Laboratory Services in 1930s Britain,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 47, Part B (2014): 233–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

3 Jesse Olszynko-Gryn, “Pregnancy Testing in Britain, c.1900–67: Laboratories, Animals and Demand from Doctors, Patients and Consumers” (PhD diss., University of Cambridge, 2014), 229.

4 Anderson, Stuart, “Community Pharmacy and Sexual Health in 20th Century Britain,” Pharmaceutical Journal 266, no. 7129 (6 January 2001): 23–29Google Scholar; Mechen, Ben, “‘Closer Together’: Durex Condoms and Contraceptive Consumerism in 1970s Britain,” in Perceptions of Pregnancy from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Evans, Jennifer and Meehan, Ciara (Basingstoke, 2016), 213–36Google Scholar.

5 Olszynko-Gryn, “Pregnancy Testing in Britain,” 240.

6 Moira Keenan, “Do-It-Yourself Pregnancy Test,” Times (London), 15 September 1971, 16.

7 “Survey of Women Using Pregnancy Test,” Pharmaceutical Journal, 30 January 1971; 6, 13, 20, 27 February 1971; 6 and 13 March 1971.

8 The National Archives, MH 156/633, Mr. A. B. Giles, undated report to the Lane Committee on the Working of the Abortion Act 1967.

9 Jesse Olszynko-Gryn, “The Feminist Appropriation of Pregnancy Testing in 1970s Britain,” Women's History Review 28, no. 6 (2019): 869–94.

10 Consumers’ Association, Sex with Health: The “Which?” Guide to Contraception, Abortion and Sex-Related Diseases (London, 1974), 54.

11 “Pregnancy Testing,” British Medical Journal, no. 5785 (1971): 444–45.

12 The National Archives, MH 156/633, report by W. G. Robertson, 20 August 1976.

13 The National Archives, MH 156/633, Girl about Town, 16 June 1976, n.p.

14 “Large Increase in Predictor Sales,” Chemist and Druggist, no. 5058 (1977): 371.

15 Townsend, Sue, The Growing Pains of Adrian Mole (London, 1984), 23Google Scholar.

16 Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse, “Thin Blue Lines: Clearblue and the Drama of Pregnancy Testing in British Cinema and Television,” British Journal for the History of Science 50, no. 3 (Sept. 2017): 495–520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

17 L'Aimable, Guy, “Supreme Survivor,” Chemist and Druggist, no. 6049 (1996): 256–57Google Scholar.