Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T05:27:43.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of returning fertility after childbirth and during lactation by measurement of urinary oestrogen and pregnanediol excretion and cervical mucus production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

James B. Brown ,
Patricia Harrisson  and
Margery A. Smith
James B. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Australia
Patricia Harrisson
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Australia
Margery A. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Longitudinal studies involving weekly measurement of urinary oestrogen and pregnanediol excretion were performed in 55 post-partum women to identify the patterns of returning fertility. The women kept diaries of breast-feeding episodes, mucus symptoms and times of bleeding; some recorded basal body temperature and acts of intercourse. The study represented a total time of 36 years (7·8 months per woman). The majority of the women were breast-feeding throughout the study. During lactation amenorrhoea, there was complete ovarian quiescence in two-thirds of the subjects and minimal cyclic activity in the others. The first bleeds were associated with anovulatory ovarian activity in 40% of the women, with normal ovulation in 19%, with ovulation but short luteal phases in 25% and with ovulation but deficient luteal phases in 16%. The incidence of normal ovulatory cycles increased with time after delivery and with the number of cycles after delivery and eventually reached 85% even though many women were still breast-feeding at the time. Twenty-two pregnancies occurred, fourteen being unplanned: eight women were fully breast-feeding at the time of conception. Mucus symptoms correlated with the hormone values in approximately 60% of cycles. However, some women had symptoms which were difficult to interpret during their early cycles or potential fertility was not indicated by raised mucus scores or the presence of the peak mucus symptom. These problems together with the resulting confusion appeared to be the major causes for the unplanned pregnancies. Methods for coping with these problems are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 17 , supplement S9: Breast-feeding and Fertility , 1985 , pp. 5 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, S.A. & Brown, J.B. (1970) An evaluation of the method of Cox for the rapid analysis of pregnanediol in urine by gas-liquid chromatography. J. Endocr. 47, 471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Billings, E.L., Billings, J.J. & Catarinich, M. (1980) Atlas of the Ovulation Method, 4th edn. Advocate Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Billings, E.L. & Westmore, A. (1980) The Billings Method. O'Donovan, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Billings, J.J., Billings, E.L., Brown, J.B. & Burger, H.G. (1972) Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation. Lancet, i, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.B. (1956) Urinary excretion of oestrogens during pregnancy, lactation and the re-establishment of menstruation. Lancet, i, 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.B. & Matthew, G.D. (1962) The application of urinary estrogen measurements to problems in gynecology. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 18, 337.Google Scholar
Brown, J.B., Harrisson, P. & Smith, M.A. (1978) Oestrogen and pregnanediol excretion through childhood, menarche and first ovulation. J. biosoc. Sci. Suppl. 5, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J.B., Harrisson, P., Smith, M.A. & Burger, H.G. (1981) Correlations Between the Mucus Symptoms and the Hormonal Markers of Fertility Throughout Reproductive Life. Monograph of the Ovulation Method Research and Reference Centre of Australia, Advocate Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Brown, J.B., Mcleod, S.C., Macnaughton, C., Smith, M.A. & Smyth, B. (1968) A rapid method for measuring oestrogens in human urine using a semi-automatic extractor. J. Endocr. 42, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R.I. (1963) Gas chromatography in the analysis of urinary pregnanediol. J. Chromat. 12, 242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, B.A. & Eastman, C.J. (1985) Prolactin and the return of ovulation in breast-feeding women. J. biosoc. Sci. Suppl. 9, 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, P.M. & Brown, J.B. (1973) The effect of intrauterine contraceptive devices on ovarian and menstrual function in the human. J. clin. Endocr. Metab. 36, 1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivera, R., Ortiz, E., Barrera, M., Kennedy, K. & Bhiwandiwala, P. (1985) Preliminary observations on the return of ovarian function among breast-feeding and post-partum non-breast-feeding women in a rural area of Mexico. J. biosoc. Sci. Suppl. 9, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, R.V. (1983) The biological basis for the contraceptive effect of breast-feeding. In: Advances in International Maternal and Child Health, Vol. 3. Edited by Jelliffe, D. B. & Jelliffe, E. F. P.. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar