Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T04:11:12.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of the frequency of nursing and of previous lactation experience on serum prolactin in lactating mothers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

P. Delvoye
Affiliation:
Centre Scientifique et Médical de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles pour ses Actions de Coopération (CEMUBAC) auprés de l’Institut de Recherche Scientifique, Lwiro, Zaïre
M. Demaegd
Affiliation:
Centre Scientifique et Médical de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles pour ses Actions de Coopération (CEMUBAC) auprés de l’Institut de Recherche Scientifique, Lwiro, Zaïre
J. Delogne-Desnoeck
Affiliation:
Centre Scientifique et Médical de l’Université Libre de Bruxelles pour ses Actions de Coopération (CEMUBAC) auprés de l’Institut de Recherche Scientifique, Lwiro, Zaïre
C. Robyn
Affiliation:
Human Reproduction Research Unit, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Saint-Pierre, 322 rue Haute, 1000—Bruxelles, Belgium

Summary

Serum prolactin has been measured in single blood samples collected within the first 22 post-partum months from 97 nursing mothers from an urban area (Bukavu) of Zaïre. Nursing mothers are hyperprolactinemic, higher serum prolactin levels being associated with more frequent suckling episodes per day. Furthermore, serum prolactin declines rapidly in mothers who are giving the breast less than four times per day: the levels are within the normal range found in non-lactating women after the 6th post-partum month. Among mothers giving the breast more than six times per day, serum prolactin does not decline significantly during the 1st post-partum year.

Previous lactation experiences do not facilitate the effect of nursing on prolactin secretion during subsequent lactations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubert, M.L., Becker, R.L., Saxena, B.B. & Raiti, S. (1974) Report of the National Pituitary Agency. Collaborative study of the radioimmunoassay of human prolactin. J. clin. endocr. Metab. 38, 1115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badawi, M., Bila, S., L’Hermite, M., Perez-Lopez, F.R. & Robyn, C. (1974) Comparative evaluation of radioimmunoassay methods for human prolactin using anti-ovine and anti-human prolactin sera. In: Radioimmunoassay and Related Procedures in Medicine, Vol. 1, p. 411. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Delvoye, P., Desnoeck-Delogne, J. & Robyn, C. (1976) Serum-prolactin in long-lasting amenorrhoea. Lancet, ii, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delvoye, P., Demaegd, M., Uwayitu, -Nyampeta & Robyn, C. (1977) Time-course of physiological hyperprolactinemia during two years lactation. Clin. Endocr. (in press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robyn, C., Delvoye, P., Van Exter, C., Vekemans, M., Caufriez, A., Denayer, P., Delogne-Desnoeck, J. & L’Hermite, M. (1976) Physiological and pharmacological factors influencing prolactin secretion and their relation to human reproduction. In: Prolactin and Human Reproduction. Edited by Crosignani, P.G. and Robyn, C.. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G.W. (1956) Statistical Methods applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar