Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Mark Lyons-Amos (a1) (a2) and Ingrid Schoon (a2) (a3)


Economic conditions have dramatic influences on fertility. This paper evaluates the effect of the 2008 ‘Great Recession’ in the UK on first birth rate, which is the fertility behaviour most susceptible to external economic conditions. The key aim of the study was to assess the effect of the recession on fertility by individual-level characteristics, enabling variation in responses to economic hardship to be observed. Data were from the nationally representative UK Household Longitudinal Study (UK-HLS). Cumulative transition models were used to model the probability of first birth for women between the ages of 17 and 30 in three UK birth cohorts. The effect of the recession was captured using direct measures (local unemployment rates and individual unemployment status) and a pre-/post-comparison, capturing indirect effects. In general, higher birth rates were observed among more disadvantaged women compared with advantaged groups. The effect of the recession was disaggregated by social strata; the overall effect was counter-cyclical although at a slower rate among disadvantaged women.


Corresponding author

1 Corresponding author. Email:


Hide All
Andersson, G. (2000) The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behavior: pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s. European Journal of Population 16(4), 293333.
Bernardi, L., Klaerner, A. & von der Lippe, H. (2007) Job insecurity and the timing of parenthood: a comparison between Eastern and Western Germany. European Journal of Population 2, 287313.
Berrington, A. (2004) Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends 117, 919.
Cherlin, A. J., Cumberworth, E., Morgan, S. P. & Wimer, C. (2013) The effects of the Great Recession on family structure and fertility. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 650, 214231.
Elzinga, C. & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007) De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: a cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population 23(3), 225250.
Frejka, T. & Sardon, J. P. (2007) Cohort birth order, parity progression ratio and parity distribution trends in developed countries. Demographic Research 16(11), 315374.
Goldstein, J. R., Kreyenfeld, M., Jasilioniene, A. & Orsal, D. K. (2013) Fertility reactions to the Great Recession in Europe: recent evidence from order-specific data. Demographic Research 29, 85104.
Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T. & Jasilioniene, A. (2009) The end of lowest-low fertility? Population and Development Review 35(4), 663700.
Heuveline, P. & Timberlake, J. M. (2004) The role of cohabitation in family formation: the United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5), 12141230.
Hinde, A. (2003) England’s Population: A History Since the Domesday Survey. Hodder Arnold, London.
Holland, J. A. (2012) Home and where the heart is: marriage timing and joint home purchase. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 28(1), 6589.
Kohler, H-P., Billari, F. C. & Ortega, J. A. (2002) The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe: fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review 28(4), 641680.
Kohler, H-P. & Kohler, I. (2002) Fertility decline in Russia in the early and mid 1990s: the role of economic uncertainty and labour market crises. European Journal of Population 18, 233262.
Kravdal, O. (1994) The importance of economic activity, economic potential and economic resources for the timing of first births in Norway. Population Studies 48, 249267.
Kreyenfeld, M. (2005) Economic Uncertainty and Fertility Postponement. Evidence from German Panel Data. MPIDR Working Papers WP 2005-034, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
McDonald, P. (2000) Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research 17, 116.
McLanahan, S. (2004) Diverging destinies: how children fare under the second demographic transition. Demography 41(4), 607627.
Mills, M. & Blossfeld, H. P. (2003) Globalization, uncertainty and changes in early life courses. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 6(2), 188218.
Neels, K., Theunynck, Z. & Wood, J. (2013) Economic recession and first births in Europe: recession-induced postponement and recuperation of fertility in 14 European countries between 1970 and 2005. International Journal of Public Health 58(1), 4355.
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. & Beaujouan, E. (2012) Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies 66(3), 311327.
Perelli-Harris, B. (2003) Young mothers, only children: lowest-low fertility in Ukraine. In Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New York, US, 1st–3rd May 2003.
Perelli-Harris, B. (2006) The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in post-Soviet Russia. Population and Development Review 32, 729753.
Perelli-Harris, B. & Lyons-Amos, M. (2015) Changes in partnership patterns across the life course: an examination of 14 countries in Europe and the United States. Demographic Research 33(6), 145178.
Schoon, I. & Lyons-Amos, M. (2016) Diverse pathways in becoming an adult: the role of structure, agency and context. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 46, 1120.
Sobotka, T. (2004) Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review 30(2), 195220.
Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V. & Philipov, D. (2011) Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review 37(2), 267306.
Testa, M. R. & Basten, S. (2014) Certainty of meeting fertility intentions declines in Europe during the ‘Great Recession’. Demographic Research 31(23), 687734.
Vikat, A. (2004) Women’s labour force attachment and childbearing in Finland. Demographic Research (Special Collection 3, Article 8). 177212.
Witte, J. C. & Wagner, G. G. (1995) Declining fertility in East Germany after unification: a demographic response to socioeconomic change. Population and Development Review 21, 387397.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Biosocial Science
  • ISSN: 0021-9320
  • EISSN: 1469-7599
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-biosocial-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed