Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:05:51.714Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The choice of sterilization: voluntarily childless couples, mothers of one child by choice, and males seeking reversal of vasectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Victor J. Callan  and
Raymond W. Que Hee
Victor J. Callan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Raymond W. Que Hee
Affiliation:
Wickham Terrace, Brisbane, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The voluntarily childless and parents of one child by choice might be expected to make strong use of sterilization. This study examined the reasons given by couples who were early articulators of voluntary childlessness, couples childless through postponement, and mothers of a single child, for selecting or avoiding sterilization. Early articulators were more likely to be sterilized and more often reported difficulties in arranging sterilization than did those who were postponing parenthood. Among the voluntarily childless and mothers of a single child who were not sterilized, respondents cited its finality, aversion to non-essential surgery, and satisfaction with present methods. Clinic data on requests for reversals of previous vasectomies revealed that neither the intentionally childless nor single child parents were over-represented among men seeking reversals.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 241 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, F. (1982) Voluntary childlessness and contraception: problems and practices. J. biosoc. Sci. 14, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callan, V.J. (1980) Family size attitudes and use of contraception in Sydney: Australian, Greek and Italian parents. Aust. N.Z. J. Sociol. 16, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, V.J. (1982) How do Australians value children? A review and research update using the perceptions of parents and voluntarily childless adults. Aust. N.Z. J. Sociol. 18, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, V.J. (1983) Perceptions of parenthood and childlessness: a comparison of mothers and voluntarily childless wives. Popul. Envir. Behav. Social Issues, 6.Google Scholar
Carlisle, E. (1982) Fertility control and the voluntarily childless: an exploratory study. J. biosoc. Sci. 14, 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawke, S. & Knox, D. (1976) One Child by Choice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Houseknecht, S. (1978) Voluntary childlessness: a social-psychological model. Alternative Lifestyles, 1, 379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeton, J. (1974) The human reproductive process as a basis for understanding fertility–trends in current research. In: Family Planning, Population Education Issues in Australia, p. 64. Edited by Cochrane, R.H.. Australian and New Zealand Book Company, Sydney.Google Scholar
Veevers, J.E. (1979) Voluntary childlessness: a review of issues and evidence. Marr. Fam. Rev. 2, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veevers, J.E. (1980) Childfree by Choice. Butterworth, Toronto.Google Scholar
Ware, H. (1973) Limits of acceptable family size: evidence from Melbourne, Australia. J. biosoc. Sci. 5, 309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, C. & Ware, H. (1979) Contraceptive use in Australia. Aust. N.Z. J. Obstet. Gynaec. 19, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed