Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

CHILDLESSNESS AND INVESTMENT IN NIECES, NEPHEWS, AUNTS AND UNCLES IN FINLAND

  • ANTTI O. TANSKANEN (a1)

Summary

Kin selection theory predicts that individuals may increase their inclusive fitness by investing in their genetically related kin. In addition, according to the reproductive value hypothesis, individuals may increase their fitness more by investing in their kin in descending rather than ascending order. The present study uses the Generational Transmissions in Finland data collected in 2012 (n=601 women) and analyses whether childless younger women invest more in their kin than younger women with children. The study finds that childless women are more likely than mothers to invest in their nieces and nephews but not their aunts and uncles. Thus the results are in line with the reproductive value prediction.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Abma, J. C. & Martinez, G. M. (2006) Childlessness among older women in the United States: trends and profiles. Journal of Marriage and Family 68, 10451056.
Albertini, M. & Kohli, M. (2009) What childless older people give: is the generational link broken? Ageing and Society 29, 12611274.
Beck, U. & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002) Individualization. Sage Publications, London.
Buchanan, A. & Rotkirch, A. (eds) (2013) Fertility Rates and Population Decline: No Time for Children? Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Essock-Vitale, S. M. & McGuire, M. T. (1985) Women's lives viewed from an evolutionary perspective. II. Patterns of helping. Ethology and Sociobiology 6, 155173.
Hakim, C. (2005) Childlessness in Europe. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon.
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7, 152.
Hughes, A. (1988) Evolution and Human Kinship. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Jokela, M., Alvergne, A., Pollet, T. V. & Lummaa, V. (2011) Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality 25, 487500.
Komter, A. E. & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2002) Solidarity in Dutch families: family ties under strain? Journal of Family Issues 23, 171188.
Michalski, R. L. & Euler, H. A. (2008) Evolutionary perspectives on sibling relationships. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) Family Relationships: An Evolutionary Perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 185204.
Pollet, T. V. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008) Childlessness predicts helping of nieces and nephews in United States, 1910. Journal of Biosocial Science 40, 761770.
Pollet, T. V. & Hoben, A. D. (2011) An evolutionary perspective on siblings: rivals and resources. In Salmon, C. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds) The Oxford Handbook on Evolutionary Family Psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 128148.
Pollet, T. V., Kuppens, T. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2006) When nieces and nephews become important: differences between childless women and mothers in relationships with nieces and nephews. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 4, 8393.
Statistics Finland (2012) Families. Statistics Finland, Helsinki.
Wenger, G. C., Scott, A. & Patterson, N. (2000) How important is parenthood? Childlessness and support in old age in England. Ageing and Society 20, 161182.

CHILDLESSNESS AND INVESTMENT IN NIECES, NEPHEWS, AUNTS AND UNCLES IN FINLAND

  • ANTTI O. TANSKANEN (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed