Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-19T02:57:39.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of health programme effects with longitudinal studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

Michael G. M. Rowland
Michael G. M. Rowland
Affiliation:
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When assessing the effects of a programme one must first consider its objectives. When applied to the improvement of health, the word programme implies an intervention which is sustained, complex, dealing with more than a single aspect of one disease and usually going beyond simple provision of fixed curative facilities. How a programme is assessed will vary with the different components and the underlying purpose of the assessment. It is important to ask just what information is needed and whether or not it needs to be collected on a longitudinal basis.

Type
Monitoring interventions and assessment of their effects
Information
Journal of Biosocial Science , Volume 21 , supplement S10: Health Interventions and Mortality Change in Developing Countries , 1989 , pp. 87 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, J. H. (1984) Types of investigations. In: Survey Methods in Community Medicine, p. 8. 3rd edn. Churchill Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
Briend, A., Wojtyniak, B. & Rowland, M. G. M. (1988) Breast-feeding, nutritional status and child survival in rural Bangladesh. Br. med. J. 296, 879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briend, A., Wojtyniak, B. & Rowland, M. G. M. (1987) Arm circumference and risk of death in rural Bangladeshi children. Lancet, ii, 725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. C. (1986) Primary health care in developing countries: overcoming operational, technical, and social barriers. Lancet, ii, 1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. P. (1985) Lifelines. In: The State of the World's Children 1986, p. 82. UNICEF and Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rahman, M., Chen, L. C., Chakraborty, J., Yunus, M., Chowdhury, A. I., Sarder, A. M., Bhatia, S. & Curlin, G. T. (1982) Use of tetanus toxoid for the prevention of neonatal tetanus. 1. Reduction of neonatal mortality by immunization of non-pregnant women and women during pregnancy in rural Bangladesh. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 60, 269.Google Scholar
Rowland, M. G. M. (1985) Health care implications of growth charts. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Growth Monitoring in Children. Edited by Talukder, M. Q-K. et al. National Nutrition Council, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
Rowland, M. G. M. (1986) The weanling's dilemma: are we making progress? Acta paediat. scand. suppl. 323, 33.Google Scholar
Sommer, A., Tarwotjo, I., Djunaedi, E., West, K. P., Loeden, A. A., Tilden, R. & Mele, L. (1986) The impact of vitamin A supplementation on childhood mortality: a randomised controlled community trial. Lancet, i, 1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, B., Rowland, M. G. M. & Clemens, J. D. (1987) ORS, too much or too little? Lancet, i, 33.Google Scholar
Walsh, J. A. (1983) Selective primary health care: strategies for control of disease in the developing world. IV Measles. Rev. infect. Dis. 5, 330.Google Scholar